Literature DB >> 30573129

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Mohamad Alkhouli1, Tatiana Busu2, Kuldeep Shah2, Mohammed Osman2, Fahad Alqahtani2, Bryan Raybuck2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence and clinical impact of device related thrombus (DRT) following precautions left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).
BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombus is a known complication of LAAO. However, data on the incidence of DRT and its impact on outcomes are limited.
METHODS: The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies to calculate the pooled incidence of DRT and the pooled odds ratio (OR) of ischemic events in patients with DRT and those without DRT.
RESULTS: In the 66 included studies; the incidence of DRT was 351/10, 153 (3.8%, range 0% to 17%, I2 = 56.8). The diagnosis was made in <90, 90 to 365, and >365 days in 42%, 57%, and 1% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in DRT rates between the AMPLATZER (AMPLATZER, AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, Minnesota) and WATCHMAN (WATCHMAN, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts) devices (3.6% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.24). In a meta-regression, age, gender, heart failure, diabetes, CHA2DS2-VASc score, previous stroke, and post-LAAO antithrombotic regimen did not explain the heterogeneity in the incidence of DRT. The pooled incidence of ischemic events in studies that compared outcomes of patients with and without DRT (32 studies; n = 7,689) was 13.2% (37 of 280) in patients with DRT and 3.8% (285 of 7,399) in those without DRT (OR: 5.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.66 to 7.59; p < 0.001, I2 = 0). In a sensitivity analysis including randomized trials and prospective multicenter registries, the incidence of DRT was 3.7%, and DRT remained associated with higher rates of ischemic events (13.5% vs. 4.4%, OR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.77 to 6.22; p < 0.001, I2 = 0).
CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAO is uncommon (3.8%) but is associated with a 4- to 5-fold increase in ischemic events. Further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and the optimal surveillance and management of DRT.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; device-related thrombus; left atrial appendage occlusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30573129     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of cardiac surgery with left atrial appendage occlusion versus no Occlusion, direct oral Anticoagulants, and vitamin K Antagonists: A systematic review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nso Nso; Mahmoud Nassar; Milana Zirkiyeva; Sofia Lakhdar; Tanveer Shaukat; Laura Guzman; Mohsen Alshamam; Allison Foster; Rubal Bhangal; Solomon Badejoko; Anthony Lyonga Ngonge; Mpey Tabot-Tabot; Yolanda Mbome; Vincent Rizzo; Most S Munira; Senthil Thambidorai
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis.

Authors:  Yuyi Chen; Yonghua Zhang; Lulu Qu; Chunyu Chen; Xi Su; Yanhong Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Short-term non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in preventing device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Yuyi Chen; Yonghua Zhang; Lulu Qu; Weiping Huang; Xi Su; Yanhong Chen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Large Cystic Intracardiac Mass Overlying Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Joury; Nadia Abelhad; Jayna Kelly; Francis Benn; Joseph A R Englert
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2020-12-11

5.  Nine-year, single-centre experience of left atrial appendage occlusion: patient characteristics, procedural outcomes and long-term follow up.

Authors:  Mark Abelson; Andre Phillips; Shirley Middlemost
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 1.167

6.  Device-Related Thrombosis in Patients Receiving One-Stop Intervention for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xing Hu; Min Tang; Jing-Tao Zhang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Preclinical Assessment of a Novel Conformable Foam-Based Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device.

Authors:  Robert J Sommer; Ronald Lamport; David Melanson; Carol Devellian; Andy Levine; Christopher M Cain; Aaron V Kaplan; William A Gray
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.