| Literature DB >> 30572682 |
Rasim Alosmanov1,2, Jennet Imanova3, Karol Wolski4, Ralf Ziemmermann5,6, Sylwia Fiejdasz7, Janusz Przewoźnik8, Kamil Goc9, Czesław Kapusta10, Szczepan Zapotoczny11, Michał Szuwarzyński12.
Abstract
The utilization of used crosslinked functional polymers (CFP) applied as sorbents or ion-exchangers is a great challenge arising from the need to protect the environment. In this paper we report a very promising way of obtaining carbon/magnetic composites based on metal (Co2+; Ni2+; Fe3+) derivatives of butadiene rubber-based phosphorus-containing polymer, which were treated as the model used CFP. We proposed a facile one-step thermal degradation approach to transform used CFP into carbon/magnetic composites (CMC). The obtained CMCs contained a mixture of metal phosphates and metal phosphides that exhibited strong magnetic properties due to the presence of nanosized metal derivatives with diameters of 100⁻140 nm. Structural and morphological changes of CFP and CMC after thermal degradation were investigated by the FTIR technique, X-ray Diffraction analysis, Scanning Electron Microscope, and Atomic Force Microscope⁻Magnetic Force Microscope. Moreover, thermal degradation kinetics parameters were determined to optimize the efficiency of the process.Entities:
Keywords: carbon/magnetic composite; nanoparticles; phosphorus-containing polymer; thermal degradation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30572682 PMCID: PMC6316096 DOI: 10.3390/ma11122595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The main characteristic of the PhCP.
| Characteristic | Type |
|---|---|
| Polymer matrix structure | Cross-linked butadiene rubber |
| The main functional groups | Phosphonate (−OP(O)(OH)2); |
| Other functional groups | >CH–Cl; |
| Ionic form | H+ |
| Total exchange, equiv/kg of dry polymer | 9.3 |
| Ionization constant: pKa1, pKa2 | 4.4; 8.6 |
| Size of particles, mm | 0.30−0.40 |
| Surface morphology | Porous and rough structure |
Scheme 1Synthesis procedure of carbon/magnetic composites.
Figure 1Normalized transmittance FTIR spectra of: A) PhCP, B) Ni-PhCP, C) Fe-PhCP, and D) Co-PhCP.
Figure 2TG/DTG curves of the PhCP (A), Co-PhCP (B), Fe-PhCP (C), and Ni-PhCP (D). Heating rate: 1 K·min−1.
The kinetics parameters obtained by Friedman and OFW methods for PhCP and all metal forms (Co-PhCP, Fe-PhCP, and Ni-PhCP).
| Samples | Step I | Step II | Step III | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lg | lg | lg | ||||||||||
| Friedman | OFW | Friedman | OFW | Friedman | OFW | Friedman | OFW | Friedman | OFW | Friedman | OFW | |
|
| 62.4 ± 1.6 | 63.5 ± 2.2 | 7.14 ± 0.40 | 6.82 ± 0.96 | 131.4 ± 4.3 | 125.4 ± 4.6 | 11.89 ± 2.37 | 10.36 ± 3.06 | 141.8 ± 5.1 | 142.9 ± 5.6 | 9.04 ± 1.60 | 9.41 ± 1.48 |
|
| 71.7 ± 8.4 | 75.4 ± 7.6 | 7.56 ± 3.09 | 8.06 ± 3.59 | 127.3 ± 12.2 | 126.0 ± 12.0 | 11.11 ± 1.63 | 10.72 ± 0.79 | 175.0 ± 9.0 | 167.4 ± 6.7 | 10.18 ± 2.81 | 10.00 ± 1.56 |
|
| 66.5 ± 21.9 | 70.1 ± 22.5 | 5.91 ± 1.66 | 6.14 ± 1.75 | 119.7 ± 8.7 | 117.8 ± 11.5 | 9.47 ± 0.83 | 9.22 ± 0.98 | 167.9 ± 14.4 | 155.7 ± 11.62 | 10.89 ± 2.85 | 9.55 ± 2.17 |
|
| 73.0 ± 4.0 | 75.6 ± 3.7 | 7.67 ± 2.25 | 7.51 ± 2.54 | 145.0 ± 20.5 | 137.7 ± 17.06 | 11.53 ± 1.20 | 11.18 ± 1.62 | 190.5 ± 17.0 | 187.4 ± 15.1 | 12.37 ± 2.66 | 12.14 ± 1.61 |
Reaction order obtained by Friedman method for PhCP and all metal forms (Co-PhCP, Fe-PhCP, and Ni-PhCP).
| Samples | Step I | Step II | Step III |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.68 | 2.91 | 1.86 |
|
| 1.00 | 3.28 | 0.50 |
|
| 1.30 | 2.88 | 1.69 |
|
| 0.50 | 3.20 | 0.83 |
Figure 3Variations of E vs. fractional mass loss (α) for the second (A) and third (B) degradation stages of the samples based on Friedman (1) and OFW (2) methods.
Figure 4The FTIR spectra of: A) CM, B) Co-CMC, C) Fe-CMC, and D) Ni-CMC.
Figure 5SEM images of the samples: A—CM; B—Co-CMC; C—Fe-CMC, and D—Ni-CMC.
Figure 6XRD patterns of the samples: A—Ni-CMC, B—Co-CMC, and C—Fe-CMC.
Lists the crystallographic parameters of identified compounds in the Ni-CMC and Co-CMC.
| Compound | The Lattice Parameters (nm) | Crystal System | Space Group | Space Group Number | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | c | ||||
| Ni(PO3)2 | 1.11 | 0.82 | 0.98 | Monoclinic | C2/c | 15 |
| Ni2P | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.34 | Hexagonal | P-62m | 189 |
| Ni2(P4O12) | 11.61 | 8.22 | 9.83 | Monoclinic | C2/c | 15 |
| Co(PO3)2 | 1.12 | 0.83 | 0.99 | Monoclinic | C2/c | 15 |
| CoP | 0.51 | 0.33 | 0.56 | Orthorhombic | Pnma | 62 |
Figure 7AFM topography and magnetic phase images for Fe-CMC (A), Co-CMC (B), and Ni-CMC (C). An arrows indicates magnetic particles.