| Literature DB >> 30572619 |
César Payán-Gómez1, Diego Rodríguez2, Diana Amador-Muñoz3, Sandra Ramírez-Clavijo4.
Abstract
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is one of the brain regions with more prominent changes in human aging. The molecular processes related to the cognitive decline and mood changes during aging are not completely understood. To improve our knowledge, we integrated transcriptomic data of four studies of human PFC from elderly people (58⁻80 years old) compared with younger people (20⁻40 years old) using a meta-analytic approximation combined with molecular signature analysis. We identified 1817 differentially expressed genes, 561 up-regulated and 1256 down-regulated. Pathway analysis revealed down-regulation of synaptic genes with conservation of gene expression of other neuronal regions. Additionally, we identified up-regulation of markers of astrogliosis with transcriptomic signature compatible with A1 neurotoxic astrocytes and A2 neuroprotective astrocytes. Response to interferon is related to A1 astrocytes and the A2 phenotype is mediated in aging by activation of sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway and up-regulation of metallothioneins I and genes of the family ERM (ezrin, radixin, and moesin). The main conclusions of our study are the confirmation of a global dysfunction of the synapses in the aged PFC and the evidence of opposite phenotypes of astrogliosis in the aging brain, which we report for the first time in the present article.Entities:
Keywords: Prefrontal cortex aging; meta-analysis of transcriptomic; reactive astrogliosis; synapsis aging
Year: 2018 PMID: 30572619 PMCID: PMC6317157 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8120227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1Workflow of the data selection. Search in PubMed and GEO database identified nine datasets involving transcriptomic analysis of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in humans. After removal of duplicates and quality control, five datasets were selected in this research.
Description of studies included in the analysis.
| GEO Code | Brain Region | Samples (Elderly/Young) | Platform | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE53987 | Pre-frontal cortex | 4/4 | Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array | PMID: 25786133 |
| GSE11512 | Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | 4/8 | Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array | PMID: 19307592 |
| GSE17612 | Brodmann area 10: anterior prefrontal cortex | 7/3 | Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array | PMID: 19255580 |
| GSE17757 | Superior frontal gyrus region of the prefrontal cortex | 4/3 | Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Array | PMID: 20647238 |
| GSE71620 | Brodmann area 11 | 48/39 | Affymetrix Human Gene 1.1 ST Array | PMID: 26699485 |
GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus. Young are samples from people 20–40 years old, elderly are samples from people 58–80 years old. GSE71620 was used as an external validation dataset.
Figure 2Study workflow. Study was performed in three connected modules. (A) Quality control and preprocessing of individual studies. (B) Each dataset was analyzed individually using limma and lists of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were compared by Venn analysis. (C) Datasets were combined by meta-analysis. The DEGs were analyzed by pathway over-representation with DAVID and signature analysis was performed using the WebGestalt algorithms. Results of the meta-analysis were validated by comparison with an external dataset (GSE71620).
Figure 3(A) Venn diagram of DEGs identified from the individual analysis (GSE11512, GSE17612, GSE53987, and GSE17757) and from the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis identified 1218 genes that were identified by the individual analysis (intersection of the black ellipse with others four ellipses) and 598 additional genes that were not identified in any individual analysis. (B) Number and proportion of DEGs from individual analysis and detected by the meta-analysis. “In Meta-analysis” means the DEGs from individual analysis that were preserved in the meta-analysis, while “Out Meta-analysis” means the DEGs from individual analysis that were not present in the meta-analysis.
Summary of number and direction of the change of DEGs detected in the analysis.
| Meta-Analysis | GSE71620 | Common Genes | Proportion of Common Genes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEGs | 1817 | 5120 | 1141 | 0.63 |
| Up-regulated | 561 | 2076 | 339 | 0.60 |
| Down-regulated | 1256 | 3044 | 783 | 0.62 |
| Total genes | 6895 | 18989 | 6895 |
Pathways significantly over represented in down-regulated DEGs in elderly vs. young PFC.
| Category | Term | Count | FE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | ||||
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Glutamatergic synapse | 34 | 4.1 | 1.34 × 10−12 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Dopaminergic synapse | 34 | 3.7 | 4.41 × 10−11 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Circadian entrainment | 28 | 4.1 | 2.48 × 10−10 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | GABAergic synapse | 26 | 4.3 | 5.21 × 10−10 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Cholinergic synapse | 24 | 3.0 | 2.78 × 10−06 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Serotonergic synapse | 22 | 2.8 | 3.25 × 10−05 |
| Cluster 2 | ||||
| GO_BP | Potassium ion transmembrane transport | 19 | 2.4 | 9.52 × 10−04 |
| Cluster 3 | ||||
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Circadian entrainment | 28 | 4.1 | 2.48 × 10−10 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Oxytocin signaling pathway | 26 | 2.3 | 1.34 × 10−04 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | cGMP-PKG signaling pathway | 25 | 2.1 | 7.13 × 10−04 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Long-term depression | 13 | 3.0 | 9.54 × 10−04 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Gap junction | 16 | 2.5 | 0.001 |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Inflammatory regulation of TRP channels | 16 | 2.3 | 0.004 |
| Cluster 4 | ||||
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Nicotine addiction | 15 | 5.2 | 3.27 × 10−07 |
The pathways were clustered by genes in common. p-values were corrected by multiple comparisons with the DAVID methodology. Count is the number of down-regulated DEGs. FE is the fold enrichment, i.e., the additional times there are more DEGs in the pathway than expected by chance.
Pathways significantly over represented in DEGs up-regulated in elderly vs. young meta-analysis.
| Category | Term | Count | FE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 | ||||
| KEGG_PATHWAY | Mineral absorption | 10 | 6.1 | 2.76 × 10−05 |
| GO_BP | Cellular response to cadmium ion | 6 | 11.5 | 1.19 × 10−04 |
| GO_BP | Negative regulation of growth | 6 | 10.3 | 2.13 × 10−04 |
| GO_BP | Cellular response to zinc ion | 6 | 10.3 | 2.13 × 10−04 |
| Cluster 2 | ||||
| GO_BP | Positive regulation of cellular protein catabolic process | 4 | 11.9 | 0.004 |
| GO_BP | Regulation of organelle assembly | 3 | 24.5 | 0.005 |
| GO_BP | Positive regulation of protein localization to early endosome | 3 | 19.6 | 0.009 |
| GO_BP | Establishment of endothelial barrier | 4 | 8.2 | 0.01 |
| GO_BP | Positive regulation of early endosome to late endosome transport | 3 | 12.3 | 0.023 |
| Cluster 3 | ||||
| GO_BP | Negative regulation of smoothened signaling pathway | 5 | 8.6 | 0.002 |
| GO_BP | Dorsal/ventral pattern formation | 6 | 6.1 | 0.003 |
| GO_BP | Smoothened signaling pathway | 6 | 2.8 | 0.059 |
| Cluster 4 | ||||
| GO_BP | Response to interferon-beta | 4 | 14.5 | 0.002 |
| GO_BP | Response to interferon-gamma | 5 | 6.8 | 0.006 |
| GO_BP | Negative regulation of viral genome replication | 5 | 4.1 | 0.031 |
| GO_BP | Response to interferon-alpha | 3 | 9.8 | 0.036 |
The pathways were clustered by genes in common. p-values were corrected by multiple comparisons with the DAVID methodology. Count is the number of up-regulated DEGs. FE is the fold enrichment, i.e., the additional times there are more DEGs in the pathway than expected by chance.
Signature analysis of specific markers of neuron, oligodendrocyte and astrocyte.
| Down-Regulated | Up-Regulated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | EF | EF | ||
| Neuron | 1.91 | 0.00 × 10+00 | −6.67 | 0.00 × 10+00 |
| Oligodendrocyte | −1.33 | 1.00 × 10+00 | −1.15 | 9.56 × 10−01 |
| Astrocyte | −2.04 | 0.00 × 10+00 | 1.77 | 0.00 × 10+00 |
EF means enrichment factor, which is the number of times that there were more genes down-regulated or up-regulated than expected by chance. Positive EF means there is an over-representation of genes of cell type, while negative EF means an under-representation of genes of cell type.
Signature analysis of several signatures of activated astrocytes.
| Down-Regulated | Up-Regulated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | EF | EF | ||
| A1A2 | NA | NA | 10.13 | 1.99 × 10−06 |
| LPS astrocyte (A1) | −4.76 | 0.004 | 4.83 | 2.82 × 10−05 |
| MCAO astrocyte (A2) | −2.63 | 0.021 | 5.41 | 7.96 × 10−07 |
| Methamphetamine | 1.21 | 0.288 | −1.79 | 0.113 |
A1A2 is the signature of astrocyte activation. EF means enrichment factor, which is the number of times that there are more genes down-regulated or up-regulated than expected by chance. Positive EF means there is an over-representation of genes of cell type, negative EF means an under-representation of genes of cell type.
Signature analysis of targets of GLI transcription factors in DEGs.
| Down-Regulated | Up-Regulated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | EF | EF | ||
| GLI1 astrocyte | −1.69 | 0.013 | 3.18 | 2.59 × 10−07 |
| GLI1 total | 1.12 | 0.034 | 1.02 | 0.471 |
| GLI2 astrocyte | −2.17 | 0.001 | 2.51 | 0.001 |
| GLI2 total | 1.04 | 0.306 | 1.2 | 0.953 |
| GLI3 astrocyte | −2.63 | 0.021 | 3.45 | 0.002 |
| GLI3 total | 1 | 0.528 | −1.14 | 0.258 |
GLI1 total means that all the transcriptional targets of GLI1 were interrogated against the list of DEGs. Similarly, GLI2 and GLI3 mean the transcriptional targets of the same transcription factor. GLI1 astrocyte, GLI2 astrocyte and GLI3 astrocyte mean that only the transcriptional targets present in the list of specific markers of astrocyte were used.
Figure 4Model of tripartite synapse in elderly PFC. In elderly PFC, there is a down-regulation of expression of presynaptic genes in GABAergic and Glutamatergic synapses and down-regulation of postsynaptic genes in all kind of synapses. They are in two divergent environments (A). The presence of A1 astrocytes induces a neurotoxic phenotype; those astrocytes have an activation of inflammatory response represented by interferon pathways. (B) There are also A2 astrocytes in elderly PFC. A2 astrocytes have activation of metallothioneins, ERM and SHH pathways. Those pathways are pro-synaptogenic and neuroprotective, thus the alteration in the function of the synapses will be less severe than in (A).
(A)
| Down-Regulated | ||
|---|---|---|
| ID | EF | |
| Neuron Postsynaptic | 3.07 | 2.26 × 10−02 |
| Neuron Presynaptic | 2.13 | 4.30 × 10−02 |
| Neuron Dendritic Axonal Cytoplasmic | 1.73 | 2.41 × 10−01 |
| Neuron Nuclear Cytoplasmic | −1.09 | 6.73 × 10−01 |
| Growth Cone Markers | −2.38 | 9.32 × 10−01 |
(B)
| Presynaptic | Postsynaptic | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GABAergic synapse | 15 | 24 | 26 |
| Glutamatergic synapse | 19 | 20 | 34 |
| Dopaminergic synapse | 0 | 34 | 34 |
| Serotoninergic synapse | 0 | 21 | 22 |
| Cholinergic synapse | 7 | 24 | 24 |