Literature DB >> 30571206

Relationship Between Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance and Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents.

Akiko Maehara1,2, Gary S Mintz2, Bernhard Witzenbichler3, Giora Weisz2,4, Franz-Josef Neumann5, Michael J Rinaldi6, D Christopher Metzger7, Timothy D Henry8,9, David A Cox10, Peter L Duffy11, Bruce R Brodie12, Thomas D Stuckey12, Ernest L Mazzaferri13, Thomas McAndrew2, Philippe Généreux2,14,15, Roxana Mehran2,16, Ajay J Kirtane1,2, Gregg W Stone1,2.   

Abstract

Background In the large-scale ADAPT-DES study (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents), drug-eluting stent implantation with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance was associated with a reduction in 1-year rates of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis) compared with angiography guidance alone. We assessed whether the benefits of IVUS guidance were maintained, reduced, or increased at 2 years. Methods and Results ADAPT-DES was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized all-comers study of 8582 consecutive patients at 11 US and German sites designed to determine the frequency, timing, and correlates of adverse events after drug-eluting stents. Propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed to examine the impact of IVUS guidance on 2-year outcomes. IVUS guidance (n=3361; 39%) compared with angiography guidance (n=5221; 61%) was associated with reduced 2-year adjudicated rates of (1) major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis; 4.9% versus 7.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P=0.003), (2) definite/probable stent thrombosis (0.55% versus 1.16%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.73; P=0.003), and (3) MI (3.5% versus 5.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.83; P=0.0006). By landmark analysis, IVUS guidance compared with angiography guidance was also associated with significantly reduced rates of major adverse cardiac events, MI, stent thrombosis, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization between 1 and 2 years after drug-eluting stent implantation. The number needed to treat with IVUS guidance to prevent 1 major adverse cardiac event was reduced from 64 (42-137) at 1 year to 41 (29-69) at 2 years. Conclusions In ADAPT-DES, the early improvement in event-free survival after drug-eluting stent implantation with IVUS guidance compared with angiography guidance was further increased with longer term follow-up to 2 years. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00638794.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiography; drug-eluting stents; follow-up studies; humans; intravascular ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30571206     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  3 in total

1.  Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis Involving 24,783 Patients.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Bailu Wang; Yu Han; Shukun Sun; Ruijuan Lv; Shujian Wei
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.

Authors:  Amr Abouelnour; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-09

3.  Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Ischemic and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in East Asian Patients: 1-Year Results of the PENDULUM Registry.

Authors:  Masato Nakamura; Kazushige Kadota; Akihiko Takahashi; Junji Kanda; Hitoshi Anzai; Yasuhiro Ishii; Yoshisato Shibata; Yoshinori Yasaka; Itaru Takamisawa; Junichi Yamaguchi; Yoshihiro Takeda; Atsushi Harada; Tomoko Motohashi; Raisuke Iijima; Shiro Uemura; Yoshitaka Murakami
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.