Sunita Taneja1, Suresh Dalpath2, Nita Bhandari1, Jasmine Kaur1, Sarmila Mazumder1, Ranadip Chowdhury1, Sudarshan Mundra1, Maharaj Kishan Bhan3. 1. Centre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India. 2. Child Health and Immunisation, National Rural Health Mission, Chandigarh, India. 3. Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India and Chair, Knowledge Integration and Technology Platform, Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, New Delhi, India.
Abstract
AIM: To conduct implementation research in integrated community case management (ICCM) of childhood pneumonia, diarrhoea and fever by promoting accredited social health activists as treatment providers and generate lessons for upscaling this approach. METHODS: In this one-sample study, 49 Accredited Social Health Activists were trained in ICCM. Community awareness and demand generation activities undertaken included announcements, pamphlets and posters. Supplies of medicines and supervision of activists were maintained throughout the 10-month implementation period. Three cross-sectional surveys were conducted in households with children aged 2-59 months for documenting two-week prevalence of illnesses and care-seeking practices. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were carried out with mothers/grandmothers and activists for documenting perceptions about health activists as treatment providers. RESULTS: One third of pneumonia (113/334) and one quarter of diarrhoea (102/408) cases at end-line were treated by Accredited Social Health Activists. Proportion of households seeking care from private providers (mostly unqualified) reduced significantly from baseline to endline (81-56% for diarrhoea, p < 0.01; 78-48% for pneumonia, p < 0.01). At endline, activists were considered an acceptable and attractive source for treatment near home. CONCLUSION: Trained Accredited Social Health Activists can treat uncomplicated childhood illnesses and are accepted by the community in this role.
AIM: To conduct implementation research in integrated community case management (ICCM) of childhood pneumonia, diarrhoea and fever by promoting accredited social health activists as treatment providers and generate lessons for upscaling this approach. METHODS: In this one-sample study, 49 Accredited Social Health Activists were trained in ICCM. Community awareness and demand generation activities undertaken included announcements, pamphlets and posters. Supplies of medicines and supervision of activists were maintained throughout the 10-month implementation period. Three cross-sectional surveys were conducted in households with children aged 2-59 months for documenting two-week prevalence of illnesses and care-seeking practices. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were carried out with mothers/grandmothers and activists for documenting perceptions about health activists as treatment providers. RESULTS: One third of pneumonia (113/334) and one quarter of diarrhoea (102/408) cases at end-line were treated by Accredited Social Health Activists. Proportion of households seeking care from private providers (mostly unqualified) reduced significantly from baseline to endline (81-56% for diarrhoea, p < 0.01; 78-48% for pneumonia, p < 0.01). At endline, activists were considered an acceptable and attractive source for treatment near home. CONCLUSION: Trained Accredited Social Health Activists can treat uncomplicated childhood illnesses and are accepted by the community in this role.