Literature DB >> 30570614

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment for Delayed Union and Nonunion Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Annika Willems1, Olav P van der Jagt2, Duncan E Meuffels1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nonunions after bone fractures are usually treated surgically with risk of infections and failure of osteosynthesis. A noninvasive alternative is extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT), which potentially stimulates bone regeneration. Therefore this review investigates whether ESWT is an effective and safe treatment for delayed unions and nonunions. DATA SOURCES: Embase.com, MEDLINE ovid, Cochrane, Web of Science, PubMed publisher, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria included studies with patients with delayed union or nonunion treated with ESWT; inclusion of ≥10 patients; and follow-up period ≥6 weeks. DATA EXTRACTION: Assessment for risk of bias was conducted by 2 authors using the Cochrane tool. Union rates and adverse events were extracted from the studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two RCTs and 28 nonrandomized studies were included. One RCT was assessed at medium risk of bias and reported similar union rates between ESWT-treated patients (71%) and surgery-treated patients (74%). The remaining 29 studies were at high risk of bias due to poor description of randomization (n = 1), nonrandomized allocation to control groups (n = 2), or absence of control groups (n = 26). The average union rate after ESWT in delayed unions was 86%, in nonunions 73%, and in nonunions after surgery 81%. Only minor adverse events were reported after ESWT.
CONCLUSIONS: ESWT seems to be effective for the treatment of delayed unions and nonunions. However, the quality of most studies is poor. Therefore, we strongly encourage conducting well-designed RCTs to prove the effectiveness of ESWT and potentially improve the treatment of nonunions because ESWT might be as effective as surgery but safer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30570614     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  4 in total

1.  [Physical treatment options with impact on bone healing].

Authors:  M Arand
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Does radial shock wave therapy works in pseudarthrosis? Prospective analysis of forty four patients.

Authors:  Paulo F Kertzman; Patricia M B Fucs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Extracorporeal Shock Wave Combined with Teriparatide-Loaded Hydrogel Injection Promotes Segmental Bone Defects Healing in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Chen Xia; Binbin Shi; Chuyong Chen; Chen Yang; Guangfeng Mao; Fangfang Shi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 4.  Bone Union Assessment with Computed Tomography (CT) and Statistical Associations with Mechanical or Histological Testing: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies.

Authors:  A Willems; C Iҫli; J H Waarsing; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; D E Meuffels
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.333

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.