Literature DB >> 3057041

Multicenter, double-blind, multiple-dose, parallel-groups efficacy and safety trial of azelastine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo in the treatment of spring allergic rhinitis.

J M Weiler1, A Donnelly, B H Campbell, J T Connell, L Diamond, L H Hamilton, R R Rosenthal, G R Hemsworth, J L Perhach.   

Abstract

Azelastine, a novel antiallergic medication, was compared with chlorpheniramine maleate and placebo for efficacy and safety in the treatment of spring allergic rhinitis in a multicenter, double-blind, multiple-dose, parallel-groups study. One hundred fifty-five subjects participated. Subjects ranged in age from 18 to 60 years of age and had at least a 2-year history of spring allergic rhinitis, confirmed by positive skin test to spring aeroallergens. Medications were given four times daily; the azelastine groups received 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg in the morning and evening with placebo in the early and late afternoon; the chlorpheniramine group received 4.0 mg four times daily. Daily subject symptom cards were completed during a screening period to assess pretreatment symptoms and during a 4-week treatment period while subjects received study medications. Individual symptoms, total symptoms, and major symptoms were compared to determine efficacy of medication. Elicited, volunteered, and observed adverse experiences were recorded for each subject and compared among groups. Vital signs, body weights, serum chemistry values, complete blood cell counts, urine studies, and electrocardiograms were obtained for each subject and compared among groups. Symptoms relief in the group receiving the highest concentration of azelastine (2.0 mg twice daily) was statistically greater than in the placebo group during all weeks of the study. Lower doses of azelastine were statistically more effective than placebo only during portions of the first 3 weeks of the study. In contrast, although the chlorpheniramine group did have fewer symptoms than the placebo group during the study, the difference never reached statistical significance during any week of the study. There were no serious side effects in any of the treatment groups. Drowsiness and altered taste perception were increased significantly over placebo only in the high-dose azelastine group. Azelastine appears to be a safe, efficacious medication for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3057041     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90082-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  5 in total

Review 1.  Azelastine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  A placebo controlled study comparing the efficacy of intranasal azelastine and beclomethasone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  G Newson-Smith; M Powell; M Baehre; S P Garnham; M T MacMahon
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

Review 4.  Safety of antihistamines in children.

Authors:  A P Ten Eick; J L Blumer; M D Reed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.228

5.  Efficacy of non-sedating H1-receptor antihistamines in adults and adolescents with chronic cough: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ji-Hyang Lee; Ji Won Lee; Jin An; Ha-Kyeong Won; So-Young Park; Ji-Ho Lee; Sung-Yoon Kang; Yoshihiro Kanemitsu; Hyun Jung Kim; Woo-Jung Song
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.084

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.