Rui Miguel Costa1, Ivone Patrão2, Mariana Machado3. 1. a WJCR - William James Center for Research , ISPA - Instituto Universitário , Lisbon , Portugal. 2. b Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities and Inclusion (APPsyCI) , ISPA - Instituto Universitário , Lisbon , Portugal. 3. c ISPA - Instituto Universitário , Lisbon , Portugal.
Abstract
Objectives: Internet addiction or problematic internet use (PIU) has been related to feelings of loneliness and social networking. Research suggests that online communication may cause loneliness. We examined if the association between PIU and loneliness is independent of lack of social support, as indicated by lack of a committed romantic relationship, poor family functioning, and lack of time to interact face-to-face due to time online. Methods: Portuguese adolescents and young adults (N = 548: 16-26 years) completed the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2, the UCLA Loneliness Scale, and the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. They also reported if they had a committed romantic relationship, and if being online did not leave them time to be with partner, spend with family and socialise face-to-face with friends. Results: Social networking was reported as among the main preferences by 90.6% of the females and 88.6% of the males. Perceived loneliness was associated with PIU independently of age and indicators of social support. Conclusions: Evolution created neurophysiological mechanisms to recognize satisfying social relationships based on sensory information and bodily feedback present in face-to-face interactions. These are greatly absent in online communication. Hence, online communication likely engenders feelings of loneliness. Keypoints Problematic internet use (PIU) has been related to loneliness and social networking. Online communication was shown to increase loneliness. Lack of romantic relationships did not explain the association of PIU with loneliness. Poorer family environment did not explain the association of PIU with loneliness. Lack of face-to-face interactions due to time online also did not explain it. Lack of adequate sensory cues and bodily feedback in online contacts might facilitate it.
Objectives: Internet addiction or problematic internet use (PIU) has been related to feelings of loneliness and social networking. Research suggests that online communication may cause loneliness. We examined if the association between PIU and loneliness is independent of lack of social support, as indicated by lack of a committed romantic relationship, poor family functioning, and lack of time to interact face-to-face due to time online. Methods: Portuguese adolescents and young adults (N = 548: 16-26 years) completed the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2, the UCLA Loneliness Scale, and the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. They also reported if they had a committed romantic relationship, and if being online did not leave them time to be with partner, spend with family and socialise face-to-face with friends. Results: Social networking was reported as among the main preferences by 90.6% of the females and 88.6% of the males. Perceived loneliness was associated with PIU independently of age and indicators of social support. Conclusions: Evolution created neurophysiological mechanisms to recognize satisfying social relationships based on sensory information and bodily feedback present in face-to-face interactions. These are greatly absent in online communication. Hence, online communication likely engenders feelings of loneliness. Keypoints Problematic internet use (PIU) has been related to loneliness and social networking. Online communication was shown to increase loneliness. Lack of romantic relationships did not explain the association of PIU with loneliness. Poorer family environment did not explain the association of PIU with loneliness. Lack of face-to-face interactions due to time online also did not explain it. Lack of adequate sensory cues and bodily feedback in online contacts might facilitate it.
Entities:
Keywords:
Problematic internet use; internet addiction; loneliness; social support
Authors: Juan M Machimbarrena; Joaquín González-Cabrera; Jéssica Ortega-Barón; Marta Beranuy-Fargues; Aitor Álvarez-Bardón; Blanca Tejero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ioulia Kokka; Iraklis Mourikis; Nicolas C Nicolaides; Christina Darviri; George P Chrousos; Christina Kanaka-Gantenbein; Flora Bacopoulou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jensen Deutrom; Vasilis Katos; Mohamed Basel Al-Mourad; Raian Ali Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mehdi Akbari; Mohammad Hossein Bahadori; Shahram Mohammadkhani; Daniel C Kolubinski; Ana V Nikčević; Marcantonio M Spada Journal: Addict Behav Rep Date: 2021-05-27
Authors: Vilmantė Pakalniškienė; Roma Jusienė; Sandra B Sebre; Jennifer Chun-Li Wu; Ilona Laurinaitytė Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bach Xuan Tran; Giang Hai Ha; Giang Thu Vu; Chi Linh Hoang; Son Hoang Nguyen; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Carl A Latkin; Wilson Ws Tam; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho Journal: J Behav Addict Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 6.756