Jane Fossey1, Lucy Garrod1, Vanessa Lawrence2, Ingelin Testad3, Jane Stafford2, Joanna Murray2. 1. Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbrook Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. 2. Health Services & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. 3. Centre for Age-Related Medicine, SESAM, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Abstract
Objectives: To contribute to improvements in the design and delivery of intervention research in care homes by adopting a collaborative approach that listens to the experiences of care home staff who had participated in a clinical trial aimed at optimising and evaluating a psychosocial intervention package for people with dementia. Methods: Qualitative study involving focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 41 staff across 6 care homes with the UK. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and interpret the data. Results: Three overarching themes emerged as influential: Recognising preparedness; working together and learning more than expected. The findings highlighted the need to be attentive in addressing staff expectations, the value of sustained relationships and recognition of good practice. The FGDs also identified areas of unanticipated learning that staff and managers adopted.Conclusions: The FGDs showed the importance of considering the overall experience of care home staff who are involved in research and the importance of valuing the skills and experience they hold through positive affirmation. There are often unanticipated consequences of research involvement both on staff practice and on relationships which if promoted could help sustain effective ways of working together.
Objectives: To contribute to improvements in the design and delivery of intervention research in care homes by adopting a collaborative approach that listens to the experiences of care home staff who had participated in a clinical trial aimed at optimising and evaluating a psychosocial intervention package for people with dementia. Methods: Qualitative study involving focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 41 staff across 6 care homes with the UK. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and interpret the data. Results: Three overarching themes emerged as influential: Recognising preparedness; working together and learning more than expected. The findings highlighted the need to be attentive in addressing staff expectations, the value of sustained relationships and recognition of good practice. The FGDs also identified areas of unanticipated learning that staff and managers adopted.Conclusions: The FGDs showed the importance of considering the overall experience of care home staff who are involved in research and the importance of valuing the skills and experience they hold through positive affirmation. There are often unanticipated consequences of research involvement both on staff practice and on relationships which if promoted could help sustain effective ways of working together.
Entities:
Keywords:
Psychosocial intervention; care homes; qualitative; staff
Authors: Claire A Surr; Sahdia Parveen; Sarah J Smith; Michelle Drury; Cara Sass; Sarah Burden; Jan Oyebode Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: P Kutschar; S Berger; A Brandauer; N Freywald; J Osterbrink; D Seidenspinner; I Gnass Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Frances Bunn; Claire Goodman; Kirsten Corazzini; Rachel Sharpe; Melanie Handley; Jennifer Lynch; Julienne Meyer; Tom Dening; Adam L Gordon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Claire A Surr; Emily Shoesmith; Alys W Griffiths; Rachael Kelley; Joanne McDermid; Jane Fossey Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 2.655