Literature DB >> 30569549

A review of pregnancy iPhone apps assessing their quality, inclusion of behaviour change techniques, and nutrition information.

Hannah M Brown1,2, Tamara Bucher1,2, Clare E Collins1,2, Megan E Rollo1,2.   

Abstract

Smartphone apps for use in pregnancy are common and could influence lifestyle behaviours, but they have not been evaluated. This review aimed to assess the quality of iPhone pregnancy apps and whether they included behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and/or pregnancy-specific nutrition information. A keyword search of the Australian iTunes app store was conducted. For inclusion, apps had to be available at no cost, in English, intended for use by pregnant women, and contain nutrition information. App quality was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Absence or presence of BCTs was assessed using the CALO-RE taxonomy, with type of nutrition information included also reported. The initial key word search identified 607 apps, with 51 iPhone apps included in final evaluation. Mean overall MARS quality rating score was 3.05 out of 5 (1 = inadequate; 5 = excellent). The functionality subscale scored highest (mean = 3.32), and aesthetics scored lowest (mean = 2.87). Out of a possible 40 BCTs, 11 were present across the apps with a median of three BCTs (range: 0-6) identified per app. The median number of pregnancy-specific nutrition topics per app was three (range 0 to 7). Despite the availability of a large number of iPhone pregnancy apps, few are of high quality, with only a small number of BCTs used and limited inclusion of pregnancy-specific nutrition information. It is important to be aware of limitations within current pregnancy apps before recommending usage during this key life stage.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  app quality; apps; behaviour change techniques; iPhone; maternal nutrition; pregnancy and nutrition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30569549     DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  24 in total

1.  An Assessment of Mobile Applications Designed to Address Physical Activity During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Authors:  Rachel A Tinius; Mackenzie Polston; Hannah Bradshaw; Paula Ashley; Ashley Greene; Angel N Parker
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  Optimizing mother-baby wellness during the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic: A case for telemedicine.

Authors:  Metabel Markwei; Oluwatosin Goje
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 3.  Data handling practices and commercial features of apps related to children: a scoping review of content analyses.

Authors:  Lindsay Jibb; Elsie Amoako; Melissa Heisey; Lily Ren; Quinn Grundy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.920

4.  Dietary Interventions for Healthy Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Tools to Promote a Healthy Antenatal Dietary Intake.

Authors:  Yvette H Beulen; Sabina Super; Jeanne H M de Vries; Maria A Koelen; Edith J M Feskens; Annemarie Wagemakers
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation.

Authors:  Alison Tutt; Catherine Llewellyn; Donna Size; Jennifer Jones; Heilok Cheng; Sarah Taki; Chris Rossiter; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Midwives' Experiences with and Perspectives on Online (Nutritional) Counselling and mHealth Applications for Pregnant Women; an Explorative Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renate F Wit; Desiree A Lucassen; Yvette H Beulen; Janine P M Faessen; Marina Bos-de Vos; Johanna M van Dongen; Edith J M Feskens; Annemarie Wagemakers; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Experiences of women receiving mhealth-supported antenatal care in the village from community health workers in rural Burkina Faso, Africa.

Authors:  Antonia Arnaert; Norma Ponzoni; Zoumanan Debe; Mouoboum M Meda; Noufou G Nana; Stijn Arnaert
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-12-01

Review 8.  Smartphone applications available to pregnant women in the United Kingdom: An assessment of nutritional information.

Authors:  Catherine Bland; Kathryn V Dalrymple; Sara L White; Amanda Moore; Lucilla Poston; Angela C Flynn
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.660

9.  Mobile Phone Apps in Australia for Improving Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Search on App Stores.

Authors:  Loretta M Musgrave; Nathalie V Kizirian; Caroline S E Homer; Adrienne Gordon
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Assessing the quality of mobile applications in chronic disease management: a scoping review.

Authors:  Payal Agarwal; Dara Gordon; Janessa Griffith; Natasha Kithulegoda; Holly O Witteman; R Sacha Bhatia; Andre W Kushniruk; Elizabeth M Borycki; Lise Lamothe; Elena Springall; James Shaw
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.