| Literature DB >> 30568769 |
Dong Xiao1,2,3, Shutao Xu4, Nick J Brownbill3, Subhradip Paul5, Li-Hua Chen6, Shane Pawsey7, Fabien Aussenac8, Bao-Lian Su6,9, Xiuwen Han1, Xinhe Bao1, Zhongmin Liu1,4, Frédéric Blanc3,10.
Abstract
Acidic zeolites are porousEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30568769 PMCID: PMC6254210 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc03848a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 113C CP MAS DNP spectra of templated (a) M-β and (b) MMM-β with (μw on) (green) and without (μw off) microwave irradiation (red) at 9.4 T. TCE stands for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (solvent of impregnation).
Fig. 2Carbocations identified in activated M-β and MMM-β coded with the same colors as their corresponding assignments and correlations in Fig. 3 and 4. Values in the parenthesis are 13C chemical shifts. n1 and n2 are the number of methyl groups with 3 ≤ (n1 + n2) ≤ 7.
Fig. 313C CP MAS DNP spectra at 9.4 T, 110 K and 14.1 T, 125 K and room temperature experiments at 9.4 T of (a) activated M-β and (b) activated MMM-β. The assignments of the different carbocations (except methylnaphthalenium ions IV for clarity) are given with the same colors as their structures in Fig. 2. The experimental times for the spectra of activated M-β are ≈7 minutes at 9.4 T DNP, ≈9 minutes at 14.1 T DNP and ≈52 minutes at room temperature at 9.4 T without DNP while for activated MMM-β they are ≈2 minutes at 9.4 T DNP, ≈6 minutes at 14.1 T DNP and ≈1036 minutes at room temperature at 9.4 T without DNP. Σ† refers to the overall DNP gain and is calculated by comparing the DNP data to room temperature 9.4 T NMR spectra (see ESI†). All spectra were recorded at a MAS rate of 12.5 kHz with asterisks (*) denoting spinning sidebands.
Fig. 4DNP enhanced 2D 13C–13C refocused INADEQUATE spectra of (a) activated M-β and (b) activated MMM-β. Data were recorded at B0 = 9.4 T and a MAS frequency of vr = 12.5 kHz. Experimental times for (a) and (b) are ≈20 and 14 hours, respectively. The correlations and spectral assignments are coded with the same colors as their corresponding carbocations in Fig. 2. Signals in the black dashed box in (a) correspond to t1 noise. Correlations corresponding to naphthalenium ions (IV) are shown with the 13C chemical shifts in the single quantum dimension of the two correlated carbon atoms given in parenthesis. Enlarged figures are shown in Fig. S10 and S11.† Asterisks (*) denote spinning sidebands.
Fig. 5μw on 13C CP MAS DNP spectra of M-β activated for (a) one minute, (b) 20 minutes and (c) 60 minutes. Spectra were recorded at 9.4 T and at a MAS rate of 12.5 kHz. Asterisks (*) denote spinning sidebands. Additional spectra at different MAS rates of M-β activated for 20 minutes are shown in Fig. S16.†
Fig. 6(a and c) 29Si CP MAS DNP spectra and (b and d) μw on experimental 29Si CP MAS DNP spectra with spectral deconvolution, overall simulated lineshape and difference between experimental and simulated spectra of activated M-β (a and b) and activated MMM-β (c and d). All spectra were recorded at 9.4 T and at a MAS rate of 8 kHz. Σ† refers to the overall DNP gain and is calculated by comparing the DNP data to room temperature 9.4 T NMR spectra (see ESI†).
Fig. 7(a) DNP enhanced 29Si CP spin echo spectrum (S0) and 29Si{13C} REDOR spectrum (S′) with the reintroduction of dipolar couplings at a recoupling time of 28.5 ms. ΔS is the difference spectrum S0 – S′. Spectra were recorded at 9.4 T on activated M-β. (b) 29Si{13C} REDOR fraction ΔS/S0 as a function of the recoupling time up to 28.5 ms. The experimental time is ≈15 hours. The solid lines are the best-fit of the REDOR curves up to a ΔS/S0 of 0.25 using a first-order approximation and eqn (S4) in the ESI.† 75 The 29Si–13C dipolar coupling values are given in Table 1. The vertical error bars correspond to the error analysis as given in Section 3 in the ESI.† The REDOR curves for each 29Si site are also shown separately in Fig. S18.†
29Si–13C dipolar coupling strengths D and distances r in activated M-β and MMM-β obtained from the 29Si{13C} REDOR experiments (see ESI for the fitting procedure and description of the fitting model)
| Zeolite | 29Si sites | ∑ |
|
|
| Activated M-β | Q2 | 1200 ± 400 | 35 ± 7 | 5.6 ± 0.4 |
| Q3 | 1500 ± 500 | 39 ± 7 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | |
| Si(1Al) | 2800 ± 800 | 53 ± 8 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | |
| Q4 + Q4′ | 3200 ± 800 | 57 ± 8 | 4.7 ± 0.3 | |
| Activated MMM-β | Q2 | 65 ± 25 | 8 ± 2 | 9.1 ± 0.7 |
| Q3 | 105 ± 40 | 10 ± 2 | 8.4 ± 0.7 | |
| Si(1Al) | 155 ± 40 | 12 ± 2 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | |
| Q4 + Q4′ | 235 ± 45 | 15 ± 2 | 7.3 ± 0.3 |
Assuming a simplified 29Si–13C single spin pair model.