Literature DB >> 30566940

Perception of Risk for Older Adults: Differences in Evaluations for Self versus Others and across Risk Domains.

Jonathan J Rolison1, Yaniv Hanoch2, Alexandra M Freund3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Proxy decision-making may be flawed by inaccurate perceptions of risk. This may be particularly true when older adults are the targets of the decisions, given the pervasive negative stereotypes about older adults.
METHODS: In study 1, individuals aged 18- to 87 years (as target persons) as well as one of their close social partners (as informants) reported on the risks they perceived for the target person in various life domains. Study 2 additionally explored potential differences in how people make risky decisions on behalf of younger and older adult targets. Younger (age 18-35 years) and older (age 60-81 years) adults (as target persons of the risk evaluations) as well as informants reported on risk perceptions and the likelihood of risk-taking for health, financial, and social scenarios concerning the target persons. Congruence between self-rated and informant-rated risk perceptions and risk-taking were computed on a dyadic as well as a group level.
RESULTS: Informants' risk perceptions were positively associated with the risks their partners perceived for themselves. Informants and their partners agreed that social risks vary little across adulthood, but they disagreed in terms of recreational, financial, and health risks, and in terms of the decisions they would make.
CONCLUSION: Family members, partners, and close friends are sensitive to vulnerabilities of their social partners, but in some domains and according to their partners' age they perceive a greater (or smaller) risk than their partners perceive for themselves. In situations requiring surrogate decision-making, people may decide differently from how their social partners would decide for themselves.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult development; Domain-specific risk-taking; Risk-taking

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30566940     DOI: 10.1159/000494352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of protective behaviours during a nationwide lockdown in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Urte Scholz; Alexandra M Freund
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2021-04-13

2.  Susceptibility to COVID-19 Scams: The Roles of Age, Individual Difference Measures, and Scam-Related Perceptions.

Authors:  Julia Nolte; Yaniv Hanoch; Stacey Wood; David Hengerer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Control Matters in Elder Care Technology:: Evidence and Direction for Designing It In.

Authors:  Clara Berridge; Yuanjin Zhou; Amanda Lazar; Anupreet Porwal; Nora Mattek; Sarah Gothard; Jeffrey Kaye
Journal:  DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf)       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Are we ready for artificial intelligence health monitoring in elder care?

Authors:  Anita Ho
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  How people know their risk preference.

Authors:  Ruben C Arslan; Martin Brümmer; Thomas Dohmen; Johanna Drewelies; Ralph Hertwig; Gert G Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.