Literature DB >> 30566409

Joint cardiac and respiratory motion estimation for motion-corrected cardiac PET-MR.

Christoph Kolbitsch1, Radhouene Neji, Matthias Fenchel, Andreas Schuh, Andrew Mallia, Paul Marsden, Tobias Schaeffter.   

Abstract

Respiratory and cardiac motion can strongly impair cardiac PET image quality and tracer uptake quantification. Standard gating techniques can minimize these motion artefacts but suffer from low signal-to-noise ratio because only a small percentage of the total data is utilized. Motion correction approaches have been proposed to overcome this problem but require accurate knowledge of such physiological motion. Here we present a joint PET-MR motion estimation approach which combines complimentary dynamic image information from simultaneously acquired MR and PET to ensure improved cardiac and respiratory motion estimation for motion-corrected image reconstruction (MCIR) of PET images. A 3D triple-echo Dixon MR scan is used both for calculation of MR-based attenuation correction (AC) maps and estimation of physiological motion. PET listmode data is obtained simultaneously to the MR acquisition which is used for a joint motion estimation and reconstruction of the final MCIR PET. In a first step, dynamic cardiac and respiratory motion resolved 4D MR and PET images are reconstructed. These image series are used in a joint image registration to estimate non-rigid cardiac and respiratory motion fields. In a second step, the motion fields are utilized in a MR MCIR to obtain cardiac and respiratory resolved dynamic MR-based AC maps. In the last step, the non-rigid motion fields and the dynamic AC maps are applied in a PET MCIR to obtain the final motion-corrected PET images. PET-MR data has been obtained in six patients without any known heart disease. Motion amplitudes were between 5.6 and 16 mm, with higher values in the basal compared to the mid-ventricular and apical segments. The proposed joint PET-MR motion estimation provided more accurate motion estimation than using either modality separately. The underestimation of PET uptake due to respiratory and cardiac motion artefacts in the AC maps was up to 17%. The average increase in uptake values using MCIR was 23%  ±  10% (p  <  0.0001), with values of 28%  ±  11% (p  <  0.0001) for basal, 21%  ±  8% (p  <  0.0001) for mid-cavity and 17%  ±  7% (p  <  0.0001) for apical segments. With the proposed scheme we could ensure high PET image quality and improve local PET uptake quantification by up to 30%. Attenuation correction and motion information was obtained from the same PET-MR raw data, which was obtained during free-breathing to minimize scan times and to increase patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30566409     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

Review 1.  Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Irene Polycarpou; Georgios Soultanidis; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Quantitative PET in the 2020s: a roadmap.

Authors:  Steven R Meikle; Vesna Sossi; Emilie Roncali; Simon R Cherry; Richard Banati; David Mankoff; Terry Jones; Michelle James; Julie Sutcliffe; Jinsong Ouyang; Yoann Petibon; Chao Ma; Georges El Fakhri; Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp; Ramsey D Badawi; Taiga Yamaya; Go Akamatsu; Georg Schramm; Ahmadreza Rezaei; Johan Nuyts; Roger Fulton; André Kyme; Cristina Lois; Hasan Sari; Julie Price; Ronald Boellaard; Robert Jeraj; Dale L Bailey; Enid Eslick; Kathy P Willowson; Joyita Dutta
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Estimation of optimal number of gates in dual gated 18F-FDG cardiac PET.

Authors:  R Klén; J Teuho; T Noponen; K Thielemans; E Hoppela; E Lehtonen; H T Sipila; M Teräs; J Knuuti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  COVID-19 Pandemic Spurs Medical Telerobotic Systems: A Survey of Applications Requiring Physiological Organ Motion Compensation.

Authors:  Lingbo Cheng; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-11-09

5.  MR-guided motion-corrected PET image reconstruction for cardiac PET-MR.

Authors:  Camila Munoz; Sam Ellis; Stephan G Nekolla; Karl P Kunze; Teresa Vitadello; Radhouene Neji; Rene M Botnar; Julia A Schnabel; Andrew J Reader; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 11.082

6.  Cardiovascular 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison study.

Authors:  Jack P M Andrews; Gillian MacNaught; Alastair J Moss; Mhairi K Doris; Tania Pawade; Philip D Adamson; Edwin J R van Beek; Christophe Lucatelli; Martin L Lassen; Philip M Robson; Zahi A Fayad; Jacek Kwiecinski; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  18F-fluoride PET/MR in cardiac amyloid: A comparison study with aortic stenosis and age- and sex-matched controls.

Authors:  Jack P M Andrews; Maria Giovanni Trivieri; Russell Everett; Nicholas Spath; Gillian MacNaught; Alastair J Moss; Mhairi K Doris; Tania Pawade; Edwin J R van Beek; Christophe Lucatelli; David E Newby; Philip Robson; Zahi A Fayad; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.952

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.