Literature DB >> 30566245

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative management for recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis (DIRECT trial).

H E Bolkenstein1, G A de Wit2,3, E C J Consten1, B J M Van de Wall4, I A M J Broeders1, W A Draaisma5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results of the DIRECT trial, an RCT comparing conservative management with elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurrent diverticulitis or persistent complaints, showed that elective sigmoid resection leads to higher quality of life. The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment at 1- and 5-year follow-up from a societal perspective.
METHODS: Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the DIRECT trial. The actual resource use and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L™ score) were documented prospectively per individual patient and analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle for up to 5 years after randomization. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
RESULTS: The study included 106 patients, of whom 50 were randomized to surgery and 56 to conservative treatment. At 1- and 5-year follow-up an incremental effect (QALY difference between groups) of 0·06 and 0·43 respectively was found, and an incremental cost (cost difference between groups) of €6957 and €2674 respectively, where surgery was more expensive than conservative treatment. This resulted in an ICER of €123 365 per additional QALY at 1-year follow-up, and €6275 at 5 years. At a threshold of €20 000 per QALY, operative treatment has 0 per cent probability of being cost-effective at 1-year follow-up, but a 95 per cent probability at 5 years.
CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurring diverticulitis or persistent complaints was found to be cost-effective. Registration number: NTR1478 (www.trialregistrer.nl).
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30566245     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Indications for and Timing of Surgery for Diverticular Disease.

Authors:  Johan Friso Lock; Christian Galata; Christoph Reißfelder; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Thomas Schiedeck; Christoph-Thomas Germer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Essential updates 2018/2019: Colorectal (benign): Recent updates (2018-2019) in the surgical treatment of benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Takayuki Ogino; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Chu Matsuda; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-12-16

3.  Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Emma C Gertsen; Alicia S Borggreve; Hylke J F Brenkman; Rob H A Verhoeven; Erik Vegt; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter D Siersema; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Update on the management of sigmoid diverticulitis.

Authors:  Mark H Hanna; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Emerging evidence and recent controversies in diverticulitis: a 5-year review.

Authors:  Marina Affi Koprowski; Arthur Affleck; Vassiliki Liana Tsikitis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 6.  Changing Paradigms in the Management of Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis.

Authors:  A Chabok; A Thorisson; M Nikberg; J K Schultz; V Sallinen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.360

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.