| Literature DB >> 30564759 |
Reham Abou-Elkhair1, Shaimaa Selim2, Eman Hussein3.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of supplementing laying hen diet with phytogenic additives on laying performance, egg quality, blood constituents and egg lipid peroxidation. Two hundred Lohmann Brown Lite laying hens were randomly allotted to 4 dietary treatments: control (without phytogenic additive), fennel seeds (5 g/kg), black cumin seeds (5 g/kg) and hot red pepper (5 g/kg). Each of the 4 diets was fed to 5 replicates of 10 hens for 8 weeks. No significant differences were observed in body weight or feed intake between the groups. Dietary inclusion of fennel followed by red pepper improved (P < 0.05) egg weight, egg production, egg mass and feed conversion ratio compared with control. Higher yolk shape index, shell and albumen weight percentages and Haugh unit (P < 0.05) were recorded in the fennel supplemented group compared with control. The egg yolk color score increased by the addition of fennel or hot red pepper in laying hen diets compared with control. The inclusion of black cumin or hot red pepper decreased serum and egg yolk cholesterol and malondialdehyde concentrations (P < 0.05) compared with control. Serum aspartate aminotransferase concentration was lower in black cumin group (P < 0.05) than in other treatments. In conclusion, the best laying performance and egg quality were obtained by dietary inclusion of fennel, followed by hot red pepper and black cumin. Dietary supplementation of black cumin or red pepper may lead to the development of low-cholesterol concentration and better antioxidant capacity of eggs.Entities:
Keywords: Cholesterol; Egg quality; Hepatoprotective activity; Laying hens; Lipid peroxidation; Phytogenic additives
Year: 2018 PMID: 30564759 PMCID: PMC6286622 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.05.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Ingredients and nutrients composition of the basal diet (air-dry basis).
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ingredients, % | |
| Yellow corn | 64.04 |
| Soybean meal (44%) | 25.28 |
| Vegetable oil | 1.15 |
| Salt | 0.30 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.07 |
| Premix | 0.30 |
| Limestone | 7.80 |
| DL-methionine | 0.06 |
| Calculated energy and nutrient content, g/kg | |
| ME, MJ/kg | 11.43 |
| Crude protein | 170.2 |
| Crude fiber | 40.1 |
| Ether extract | 37.2 |
| Calcium | 32.8 |
| Available phosphorus | 5.40 |
| Methionine | 3.40 |
| Lysine | 9.00 |
| Chemical analysis, g/kg | |
| DM | 903.7 |
| Crude protein | 169.6 |
| Crude fiber | 38.4 |
| Ether extract | 30.3 |
| Ash | 95.4 |
Dicalcium phosphate, 18% granular phosphate and 23% calcium.
Supplied per kg of diet: Vitamin A 12,000 IU, vitamin D3 3,000 IU, vitamin E 40 mg, vitamin K3 3 mg, vitamin B1 2 mg, vitamin B2 6 mg, vitamin B6 5 mg, vitamin B12 0.02 mg, niacin 45 mg, biotin 0.075 mg, folic acid 2 mg, pantothenic acid 12 mg, manganese 100 mg, zinc 600 mg, iron 30 mg, copper 10 mg, iodine 1 mg, selenium 0.2 mg, cobalt 0.1 mg.
DL-methionine, Met AMINO (DL-2-amino-4-(methyl-thio)-butane acid, DL-methionine, α-amino-Y-methyl-oily acid) by Feed Grade 99% (EU).
Proximate chemical composition (g/100 g) of the tested fennel seeds, black cumin seeds and hot red pepper.1
| Item | Fennel seeds | Black cumin seeds | Hot red pepper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 6.50 | 5.53 | 4.83 |
| Crude protein | 19.20 | 29.30 | 7.70 |
| Ether extract | 7.50 | 8.13 | 2.60 |
| Crude fiber | 17.50 | 9.50 | 4.00 |
| Ash | 8.02 | 6.05 | 5.62 |
Proximate chemical composition of the tested phytogenic feed additives according to AOAC (2005).
Effect of fennel, black cumin and red pepper supplementation on the productive performance of laying hens.
| Parameters | Treatments1 | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| BW, g | ||||||
| Initial BW | 1,589.0 | 1,588.9 | 1,588.2 | 1,589.9 | 3.48 | 0.96 |
| Final BW | 1,786.2 | 1,804.7 | 1,808.3 | 1,814.2 | 11.87 | 0.18 |
| BW gain | 197.17 | 215.73 | 220.07 | 224.33 | 9.234 | 0.08 |
| Feed intake, g/hen | ||||||
| Week 32–36 | 112.99 | 110.39 | 111.97 | 111.61 | 1.987 | 0.64 |
| Week 36–40 | 126.99 | 125.01 | 126.15 | 125.99 | 1.123 | 0.42 |
| Week 32–40 | 119.99 | 117.70 | 119.06 | 118.80 | 0.999 | 0.22 |
SEM = standard error of the mean.
1 CON: control, the basal diet; T1: the basal diet + 0.5% fennel seeds; the basal diet + T2: 0.5% black cumin seeds; T3: the basal diet + 0.5% hot red pepper.
Effect of fennel, black cumin and red pepper supplementation on the laying performance during the experimental period.
| Parameters | Treatments1 | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| Egg number, /hen | ||||||
| Week 32–36 | 11.28b | 12.29a | 11.99b | 12.18a | 0.146 | 0.001 |
| Week 36–40 | 11.31b | 12.45a | 11.71ab | 12.10a | 0.233 | 0.006 |
| Week 32–40 | 11.25c | 12.52a | 11.80b | 12.09ab | 0.165 | <0.001 |
| Egg production, % | ||||||
| Week 32–36 | 80.55b | 87.78a | 85.26a | 86.98a | 1.044 | 0.001 |
| Week 36–40 | 80.17c | 91.15a | 83.32bc | 85.77b | 1.521 | 0.001 |
| Week 32–40 | 80.36c | 89.46a | 84.29b | 86.38ab | 1.175 | 0.001 |
| Egg weight, g | ||||||
| Week 32–36 | 50.96 | 51.65 | 50.53 | 51.51 | 0.395 | 0.07 |
| Week 36–40 | 53.52c | 56.46a | 54.19b | 54.46b | 0.151 | <0.001 |
| Week 32–40 | 52.24b | 54.05a | 52.36b | 52.99b | 0.201 | <0.001 |
| Egg mass, g/(hen·d) | ||||||
| Week 32–36 | 40.51c | 44.09a | 41.97b | 43.85a | 0.239 | <0.001 |
| Week 36–40 | 40.51d | 50.47a | 44.10c | 45.95b | 0.480 | <0.001 |
| Week 32–40 | 40.51d | 47.28a | 43.03c | 44.90b | 0.285 | <0.001 |
| Feed conversion ratio | ||||||
| Week 32–36 | 2.85a | 2.54b | 2.62ab | 2.58ab | 0.090 | 0.04 |
| Week 36–40 | 3.19a | 2.44c | 2.86b | 2.74b | 0.067 | <0.001 |
| Week 32–40 | 3.05a | 2.47c | 2.76b | 2.64bc | 0.072 | <0.001 |
SEM = standard error of the mean.
a–c Within a row, means with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05.
1 CON: control, the basal diet; T1: the basal diet + 0.5% fennel seeds; the basal diet + T2: 0.5% black cumin seeds; T3: the basal diet + 0.5% hot red pepper.
Effect of fennel, black cumin and red pepper supplementation on egg quality traits at 36 and 40 weeks of age.
| Parameters | Treatments1 | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| At the end of 36 weeks of age | ||||||
| Egg shape index | 77.32b | 81.38a | 79.09ab | 79.70ab | 1.169 | 0.04 |
| Shell weight, % | 13.91 | 14.61 | 13.77 | 13.61 | 0.375 | 0.11 |
| Albumen weight, % | 57.01 | 61.74 | 59.25 | 59.69 | 1.551 | 0.08 |
| Albumen index, % | 10.80b | 11.09b | 11.65a | 11.20b | 0.135 | 0.002 |
| Yolk weight, % | 29.08a | 23.65b | 26.97ab | 26.95ab | 1.641 | 0.05 |
| Yolk shape index, % | 67.57 | 70.31 | 70.13 | 69.39 | 1.811 | 0.45 |
| Yolk color score | 5.44b | 6.78a | 6.33ab | 7.00a | 0.351 | 0.01 |
| Haugh units | 81.31b | 85.28a | 81.97b | 82.52b | 0.589 | 0.001 |
| Shell thickness, mm | 0.344 | 0.357 | 0.360 | 0.352 | 0.008 | 0.26 |
| At the end of 40 weeks of age | ||||||
| Egg shape index | 75.82c | 79.31a | 74.88c | 76.88b | 0.294 | 0.001 |
| Shell weight, % | 13.30b | 14.76a | 13.43b | 13.86ab | 0.337 | 0.01 |
| Albumen weight, % | 58.71b | 62.29a | 59.67ab | 60.04ab | 0.849 | 0.02 |
| Albumen index, % | 9.98 | 10.54 | 10.64 | 10.97 | 0.312 | 0.07 |
| Yolk weight, % | 27.99a | 22.95b | 26.89a | 26.09a | 0.939 | 0.004 |
| Yolk shape index, % | 65.73c | 69.11a | 65.57c | 67.54b | 0.489 | 0.001 |
| Yolk color score | 5.22b | 6.89a | 6.11ab | 7.06a | 0.336 | 0.002 |
| Haugh units | 79.39c | 83.07a | 79.72c | 81.43b | 0.377 | 0.001 |
| Shell thickness, mm | 0.353 | 0.370 | 0.382 | 0.365 | 0.011 | 0.16 |
SEM = standard error of the mean.
a–c Within a row, means with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05.
1 CON: control, the basal diet; T1: the basal diet + 0.5% fennel seeds; the basal diet + T2: 0.5% black cumin seeds; T3: the basal diet + 0.5% hot red pepper.
Effect of fennel, black cumin and red pepper supplementation on serum biochemical constituents and egg yolk parameters of laying hens at the end of the experiment (40 weeks of age).
| Treatments1 | In serum | In egg yolk | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol, mg/dL | AST, U/L | ALT, U/L | MDA, nmol/mL | Cholesterol, mg/g | MDA, ng/g | |
| CON | 129.00a | 24.44a | 12.30 | 12.82a | 12.70a | 28.20a |
| T1 | 125.00ab | 24.59a | 12.13 | 11.69ab | 11.55ab | 27.34ab |
| T2 | 110.50c | 23.14b | 12.09 | 9.64c | 11.08b | 24.10b |
| T3 | 122.50b | 24.49a | 12.28 | 10.43bc | 11.13b | 24.50b |
| SEM | 1.306 | 0.084 | 0.282 | 0.506 | 0.408 | 0.995 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.46 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
AST = aspartate aminotransferase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; MDA = malondialdehyde; SEM = standard error of the mean.
a–c Within a row, means with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05.
1 CON: control, the basal diet; T1: the basal diet + 0.5% fennel seeds; the basal diet + T2: 0.5% black cumin seeds; T3: the basal diet + 0.5% hot red pepper.