Xinlei Fan1, Zhuo Du2, Jadson D P Bezerra3, Chengming Tian1. 1. The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, P.R. China Beijing Forestry University Beijing China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China. 3. Departamento de Micologia Prof. Chaves Batista, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Centro de Biociências, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife Brazil.
Abstract
Melanconis-like species comprise latent fungal pathogens with a wide range of woody hosts. Taxonomy of these pathogens is difficult due to their uninformative descriptions and similar asexual morphology. Based on molecular phylogenies, many species of this group were placed in various families of Diaporthales. In this study, eight species of melanconis-like fungi were isolated from Betulaalbosinensis, B.platyphylla (Betulaceae), Cornuscontroversa (Cornaceae), Corylusmandshurica (Betulaceae) and Juglansregia (Juglandaceae) in China. These species were phylogenetically placed in three families of Diaporhthales, i.e. Juglanconisjuglandina, J.oblonga (Juglanconidaceae), Melanconiellabetulicola sp. nov., M.corylina sp. nov. (Melanconiellaceae), Melanconisbetulae, Ms.itoana, Ms.stilbostoma (Melanconidaceae) and one new genus, Sheathospora (Melanconiellaceae). Sheathospora is proposed to accommodate Melanconiellacornuta with conical and discrete pycnidia with aseptate, hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoidal conidia with distinct hyaline sheath on branches of Cornuscontroversa. Combined analyses of ITS, LSU, CAL, RPB2 and TEF1-α sequence data were used to construct the molecular phylogeny. Additionally, we provided separate phylogenetic trees for three families (Juglanconidaceae, Melanconidaceae and Melanconiellaceae) to show the species distribution of melanconis-like fungi in China.
Melanconis-like species comprise latent fungal pathogens with a wide range of woody hosts. Taxonomy of these pathogens is difficult due to their uninformative descriptions and similar asexual morphology. Based on molecular phylogenies, many species of this group were placed in various families of Diaporthales. In this study, eight species of melanconis-like fungi were isolated from Betulaalbosinensis, B.platyphylla (Betulaceae), Cornuscontroversa (Cornaceae), Corylusmandshurica (Betulaceae) and Juglansregia (Juglandaceae) in China. These species were phylogenetically placed in three families of Diaporhthales, i.e. Juglanconisjuglandina, J.oblonga (Juglanconidaceae), Melanconiellabetulicola sp. nov., M.corylina sp. nov. (Melanconiellaceae), Melanconisbetulae, Ms.itoana, Ms.stilbostoma (Melanconidaceae) and one new genus, Sheathospora (Melanconiellaceae). Sheathospora is proposed to accommodate Melanconiellacornuta with conical and discrete pycnidia with aseptate, hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoidal conidia with distinct hyaline sheath on branches of Cornuscontroversa. Combined analyses of ITS, LSU, CAL, RPB2 and TEF1-α sequence data were used to construct the molecular phylogeny. Additionally, we provided separate phylogenetic trees for three families (Juglanconidaceae, Melanconidaceae and Melanconiellaceae) to show the species distribution of melanconis-like fungi in China.
() was introduced by Link (1809) from dead branches of with Link as the generic type. Corda (1837) extended this genus to 28 species. Subsequently, the genera Tul. & C. Tul. and Sacc. were described as sexual morphs of (Wehmeyer 1937, 1941). Sutton (1980) summarised more than 200 binomials that have been described in , whereas no generic revision is available due to the uninformative descriptions and illustrations, few morphological characteristics, misplacement or poor condition of original specimens and lacking of ex-type cultures. In the Index Fungorum (2018), there are more than 235 species epithets of with an estimated 50 species epithets by Kirk et al. (2008). Thus species has serious obstacles for appropriate interpretation and is phylogenetically distributed throughout the , especially in , and . Although the genus may be synonymous with and would therefore have priority, the true identity of the generic type, , is obscure and it was recommended to protect over (Rossman et al. 2015).Molecular phylogenetics have had a major impact in taxonomic rearrangements of fungi since the early 1990s (White et al. 1990, Hibbett et al. 2007, Choi and Kim 2017, Fan et al. 2018). Castlebury et al. (2002) re-evaluated based on LSU rDNA sequences, indicating the single genus with asexual morph in s. str.Rossman et al. (2007) followed this differentiation and believed that many additional species of sensuWehmeyer (1941) should be separated from . One example is (Tul. & C. Tul.) Sacc., type of the genus , which segregated from (Rossman et al. 2007). Voglmayr et al. (2012) published sequences and molecular phylogenies for species of firstly and proposed that represented a distinct clade from . Subsequently, Norphanphoun et al. (2016) introduced Lamproconiaceae to accommodate (Berk. & Broome) Sacc., with its sexual morph Petr. (Grove 1937, Sutton 1980). Voglmayr et al. (2017) proposed to accommodate Kunze. Senanayake et al. (2017) introduced to accommodate the previous unresolved .During trips to collect forest pathogens that cause canker or dieback diseases in China, several melanconis-like taxa associated with various disease symptoms were collected in Beijing, Gansu, Heilongjian, Jilin, Ningxia, Shaanxi and Tibet Provinces. As the higher-level phylogeny of many genera within the melanconis-like taxa remains largely unresolved in China, this project was initiated to address this issue. In this paper, we identified eight melanconis-like species residing in three families of ; recognised three genera within Melanoconiellaceae; and described two new species in as well as one new genus to accommodate .
Materials and methods
Isolation
Fresh specimens of melanconis-like fungi were collected from infected branches of seven hosts during collection trips in China (Table 1). A total of 47 isolates were established by removing a mucoid spore mass from ascomata or conidiomata, spreading the suspension on the surface of 1.8% potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubating at 25 °C for up to 24 h. Single germinating conidia/ascospores were removed and plated on to fresh PDA plates. Specimens and isolates were deposited in the Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education in the Beijing Forestry University (BJFU) and the working Collection of X.L. Fan (CF) housed at the BJFU. Axenic cultures are maintained in the China Forestry Culture Collection Centre (CFCC).
Table 1.
Details of the strains included for molecular study used in this study.
Species
Culture/strain/specimen
Location
Host
GenBank accession numbers
ITS
LSU
CAL
RPB2
TEF1-α
Apiosporopsiscarpinea
CBS 771.79
Switzerland
Carpinusbetulus
NA
AF277130
NA
NA
NA
Apiosporopsis sp.
11Af2-1
Japan
Alnusfirma
NA
AB669034
NA
NA
NA
Apoharknessiainsueta
CBS 111377
Brazil
Eucalyptuspellita
JQ706083
AY720814
NA
NA
NA
CBS 114575
Colombia
Eucalyptus sp.
NA
AY720813
NA
NA
NA
Asterosporiumasterospermum
MFLU 15-3555
Italy
Fagussylvatica
NA
MF190062
NA
MF377615
NA
CBS 112404
Italy
Fagussylvatica
NA
AB553745
NA
NA
NA
KT2138
Japan
Faguscrenata
NA
AB553744
NA
NA
NA
Auratiopycnidiellatristaniopsidis
CBS 132180 = CPC 16371
Australia
Tristaniopsislaurina
JQ685516
JQ685522
NA
NA
NA
Cainiellajohansonii
Kruys 731
Sweden
Dryasoctopetala
NA
JF701920
NA
NA
NA
Chapeckianigrospora
AR 3809
USA
Betula sp.
JF681957
EU683068
NA
NA
NA
Chiangraiomycesbauhiniae
MFLUCC 17-1669
Thailand
Bauhinia sp.
MF190118
MF190064
NA
MF377604
NA
MFLUCC 17-1670
Thailand
Bauhinia sp.
MF190119
MF190065
NA
MF377603
NA
Chrysocryptacorymbiae
CBS 132528
Australia
Corymbia sp.
JX069867
JX069851
NA
NA
NA
Conielladiplodiella
CBS 111858 = CPC 3708
France
Vitisvinifera
AY339323
AY339284
NA
KX833423
KX833603
Coniellakoreana
CBS 143.97
Korea
NA
KX833584
AF408378
NA
KX833490
KX833684
Coniellamusaiensisvar.hibisci
AR 3534 = CBS 109757
South Africa
Hibiscus sp.
KX833589
AF408337
NA
NA
KX833689
Coniellastraminea
CBS 149.22 = CPC 3932
USA
Fragaria sp.
AY339348
AF362569
NA
KX833506
KX833704
Coniellawangiensis
CBS 132530 = CPC 19397
Australia
Eucalyptus sp.
JX069873
JX069857
NA
KX833509
KX833705
Coryneumdepressum
AR 3897
Austria
Quercuscerris
NA
EU683074
NA
NA
NA
Coryneummodonium
AR 3558
Austria
Castaneasativa
NA
EU683073
NA
NA
NA
Coryneumumbonatum
AR 3541
Austria
Quercuscerris
NA
EU683072
NA
NA
NA
MFLUCC 15-1110
Italy
Quercus sp.
MF190121
MF190067
NA
MF377610
NA
MFLUCC 13-0658
Italy
Quercus sp.
MF190120
MF190066
NA
MF377609
NA
Cryphonectriamacrospora
AR 3444 = CBS 109764
Russia
Quercusmongolica
EU199182
AF408340
NA
EU220029
NA
Cryphonectrianitschkei
AR 3433 = CBS109776
Russia
Quercusmongolica
DQ120761
AF408341
NA
NA
NA
Cryphonectriaparasitica
ATCC 38755
USA
Castaneadentata
AY141856
EU199123
NA
DQ862017
EU222014
Cryptodiaportheaesculi
AFTOL-ID 1238 = CBS 109765
Austria
Aesculushippocastanum
DQ323530
AF408342
NA
EU199138
GU354004
AR3640 = CBS 121905
USA
Aesculushippocastanum
EU254994
EU255164
NA
EU219269
DQ313558
LCM 447.01
Germany
Aesculushippocastanum
GU367076
NA
NA
GU367110
GU354002
Cryptosporellabetulae
AR 3524 = CBS 109763
Austria
Betulapendula
EU199180
AF408375
NA
EU199139
EU221884
Cryptosporellahypodermia
AR 3552
Austria
Ulmusminor
EU199181
AF408346
NA
EU199140
NA
Cryptosporellasuffusa
AR 3496 = CBS 109750
Austria
Alnusincana
EU199207
AF408376
NA
EU199163
EU221945
Cytosporacenisia
AR 3522 = CBS 109752
Austria
Juniperuscommunis
NA
AF408385
NA
NA
NA
Cytosporachrysosperma
CFCC 89600
China
Sophorajaponica
KR045623
KR045623
NA
KU710951
KU710915
Cytosporaelaeagni
CFCC 89633
China
Elaeagnusangustifolia
KF765677
KF765693
NA
KU710956
KU710919
Cytosporaleucostoma
CFCC 50468
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732949
KT732968
NA
NA
NA
Cytosporanivea
AR 3512
Austria
Salixpurpurea
NA
AF408367
NA
NA
NA
Cytosporasacculus
AR 3416 = CBS 109756
Russia
Quercusmongolica
NA
AF408386
NA
NA
NA
AR 3426 = CBS 109777
Austria
Quercusrobur
NA
AF408387
NA
NA
NA
Dendrostomamali
CFCC 52102
China
Malusspectabilis
MG682072
MG682012
NA
MG682032
MG682052
Dendrostomaosmanthi
CFCC 52106
China
Osmanthusfragrans
MG682073
MG682013
NA
MG682033
MG682053
CFCC 52107
China
Osmanthusfragrans
MG682074
MG682014
NA
MG682034
MG682054
CFCC 52108
China
Osmanthusfragrans
MG682075
MG682015
NA
MG682035
MG682055
CFCC 52109
China
Osmanthusfragrans
MG682076
MG682016
NA
MG682036
MG682056
Dendrostomaquercinum
CFCC 52103
China
Quercusacutissima
MG682077
MG682017
NA
MG682037
MG682057
CFCC 52104
China
Quercusacutissima
MG682078
MG682018
NA
MG682038
MG682058
CFCC 52105
China
Quercusacutissima
MG682079
MG682019
NA
MG682039
MG682059
Diaporthedecedens
AR 3459 = CBS 109772
Austria
Corylusavellana
KC343059
AF408348
NA
NA
NA
Diaporthedetrusa
AR 3424 = CBS 109770
Austria
Berberisvulgaris
KC343061
AF408349
NA
NA
KC343787
Diaportheeres
AR 3538 = CBS 109767
Austria
Acercampestre
KC343075
AF408350
NA
NA
KC343801
Diaporthellacorylina
CBS 121124
China
Corylus sp.
KC343004
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diaporthella sp.
CN5
Italy
Corylusavellana
KP205483
NA
NA
NA
NA
CN13
Italy
Corylusavellana
KP205484
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diaporthosporellacercidicola
CFCC 51994
China
Cercischinensis
KY852492
KY852515
NA
NA
NA
CFCC 51995
China
Cercischinensis
KY852493
KY852516
NA
NA
NA
CFCC 51996
China
Cercischinensis
KY852494
KY852517
NA
NA
NA
Diaporthostomamachili
CFCC 52100
China
Machilusleptophylla
MG682080
MG682020
NA
MG682040
MG682060
CFCC 52101
China
Machilusleptophylla
MG682081
MG682021
NA
MG682041
MG682061
Disculoideseucalypti
CPC 17650
Australia
Eucalyptus sp.
JQ685517
JQ685523
NA
NA
NA
Disculoideseucalyptorum
CBS 132184 = CPC 17648
Australia
Eucalyptusviminalis
NR120090
JQ685524
NA
NA
NA
Ditopelladitopa
AR 3423 = CBS 109748
Austria
Alnusglutinosa
EU199187
EU199126
NA
EU199145
NA
Erythrogloeumhymenaeae
CPC 18819
Brazil
Hymenaeacourbaril
JQ685519
JQ685525
NA
NA
NA
Gnomoniagnomon
CBS 199.53
Italy
Corylusavellana
AY818956
AF408361
NA
EU219295
EU221885
Harknessiaeucalypti
CBS 342.97
Australia
Eucalyptusregnans
AY720745
AF408363
NA
NA
NA
Harknessialeucospermi
CBS 775.97
South Africa
Leucospermum sp.
NR137147
AY720824
NA
NA
NA
Harknessiamolokaiensis
AR 3578 = CBS 109779
USA
Eucalyptusrobusta
NA
AF408390
NA
NA
NA
Harknessiasyzygii
CBS 111124 = CPC184
South Africa
Syzygiumcordatum
AY720738
AY720834
NA
NA
NA
Hercosporatiliae
AR 3526
Austria
Tiliatomentosa
NA
AF408365
NA
NA
NA
Hyaliappendisporagalii
MFLUCC 16-1208
Italy
Galium sp.
MF190149
MF190095
NA
NA
NA
Involutscutellularubra
CBS 192.71
Japan
Quercusphillyraeoides
MG591899
MG591993
NA
MG976476
MG592086
Juglanconisappendiculata
D140
Greece
Juglansnigra
KY427138
KY427138
NA
KY427188
KY427207
D96
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427139
KY427139
NA
KY427189
KY427208
D96A
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427140
KY427140
NA
KY427190
KY427209
MC
Greece
Juglansnigra
KY427141
KY427141
KY427242
KY427191
KY427210
MC2
Spain
Juglansnigra
KY427142
KY427142
KY427243
KY427192
KY427211
MC4
Spain
Juglansnigra
KY427143
KY427143
KY427244
KY427193
KY427212
ME17
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427144
KY427144
KY427245
KY427194
KY427213
Juglanconisjuglandina
D142
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427145
KY427145
NA
KY427195
KY427214
CFCC 51727*
China
Juglansnigra
KY363854
KY363859
MK096394
MK096439
NA
CFCC 51728*
China
Juglansnigra
KY363855
KY363860
MK096395
MK096440
NA
CFCC 51729*
China
Juglansnigra
KY363856
KY363861
MK096396
MK096441
NA
MC1
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427146
NA
KY427246
KY427196
KY427215
MC3
Spain
Juglansnigra
KY427147
KY427146
KY427247
KY427197
KY427216
ME16
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427148
KY427147
KY427248
KY427198
KY427217
ME22
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427149
KY427148
KY427249
KY427199
KY427218
ME23
Austria
Juglansnigra
KY427150
KY427150
KY427250
KY427200
KY427219
Juglanconisoblonga
CFCC 51725*
China
Juglansnigra
KY363852
KY363857
MK096392
MK096437
NA
CFCC 51726*
China
Juglansnigra
KY363853
KY363858
MK096393
MK096438
NA
ME14
USA
Juglanscinerea
KY427151
KY427151
KY427251
KY427201
KY427220
ME15
USA
Juglanscinerea
KY427152
KY427152
KY427252
KY427202
KY427221
ME18
Japan
Juglansailanthifolia
KY427153
KY427153
KY427253
KY427203
KY427222
ME19
Japan
Juglansailanthifolia
KY427154
KY427154
KY427254
KY427204
KY427223
Juglanconispterocaryae
ME20
Japan
Pterocaryarhoifolia
KY427155
KY427155
KY427255
KY427205
KY427224
Lamproconiumdesmazieri
MFLUCC 14-1047
Russia
Tiliacordata
KX430132
KX430133
NA
NA
MF377592
MFLUCC 15-0870
Russia
Tiliatomentosa
KX430134
KX430135
NA
MF377605
MF377591
Lasmenia sp.
CBS 124123
Puerto Rico
Nepheliumlappaceum
GU797406
JF838338
NA
NA
NA
CBS 124124
Puerto Rico
Nepheliumlappaceum
JF838336
JF838341
NA
NA
NA
Luteocirrhusshearii
CBS 130776
Australia
Banksiabaxteri
NR120254
NG042770
NA
NA
NA
Macrohilumeucalypti
CPC 10945
New Zealand
Eucalyptus sp.
DQ195781
DQ195793
NA
NA
NA
CPC 19421
Australia
Eucalyptuspiperita
KR873244
KR873275
NA
NA
NA
Melanconiellabetulicola
CFCC 52482*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
MK096312
MK096352
NA
MK096397
MK096272
CFCC 52483*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
MK096313
MK096353
NA
MK096398
MK096273
Melanconiellacarpinicola
MNM
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926232
JQ926232
NA
JQ926304
JQ926370
MNUK
UK
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926234
JQ926234
NA
JQ926306
JQ926372
MSMI
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926235
JQ926235
NA
JQ926307
JQ926373
Melanconiellachrysodiscosporina
MCH
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926238
JQ926238
NA
JQ926310
JQ926376
MEE
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926240
JQ926240
NA
JQ926312
JQ926378
MGG
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926242
JQ926242
NA
JQ926314
JQ926380
Melanconiellachrysomelanconium
MCM
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926247
JQ926247
NA
JQ926319
JQ926385
MEUK
UK
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926249
JQ926249
NA
JQ926321
JQ926387
MGUK
UK
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926255
JQ926255
NA
JQ926327
JQ926393
Melanconiellachrysorientalis
MGB
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926256
JQ926256
NA
JQ926328
JQ926394
MGP
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926257
JQ926257
NA
JQ926329
JQ926395
MVH
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926259
JQ926259
NA
JQ926331
JQ926397
Melanconiellacorylina
CFCC 52484*
China
Corylusmandshurica
MK096314
MK096354
NA
MK096399
MK096274
CFCC 52485*
China
Corylusmandshurica
MK096315
MK096355
NA
MK096400
MK096275
Melanconielladecorahensis
CBS 159.26
USA
Betula sp.
JQ926260
JQ926260
NA
JQ926332
JQ926398
MD
France
Betulapendula
JQ926261
JQ926261
NA
JQ926333
JQ926399
MED
France
Betulapendula
JQ926262
JQ926262
NA
JQ926334
JQ926400
Melanconiellaechinata
DAOM 121196
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926263
JQ926263
NA
N/A
N/A
Melanconiellaelegans
AR 3830
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926264
JQ926264
NA
JQ926335
JQ926401
BPI 843574
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926266
JQ926266
NA
JQ926337
JQ926403
BPI 872067
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926267
JQ926267
NA
JQ926338
JQ926404
Melanconiellaellisii
BPI 843491
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926268
JQ926268
NA
N/A
JQ926405
BPI 878343
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926271
JQ926271
NA
JQ926339
JQ926406
BPI 883227
USA
Carpinuscaroliniana
JQ926269
JQ926269
NA
N/A
N/A
Melanconiellaflavovirens
MFV1
Austria
Corylusavellana
JQ926274
JQ926274
NA
JQ926342
JQ926409
MFV2
Austria
Corylusavellana
JQ926275
JQ926275
NA
JQ926343
JQ926410
MFV3
Italy
Corylusavellana
JQ926276
JQ926276
NA
JQ926344
JQ926411
Melanconiellahyperopta
MCHBV
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926280
JQ926280
NA
JQ926346
JQ926413
MCR
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926283
JQ926283
NA
JQ926349
JQ926416
MHG
Switzerland
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926285
JQ926285
NA
JQ926351
JQ926418
Melanconiellahyperoptavar.orientalis
MHP
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926288
JQ926288
NA
JQ926352
JQ926420
MHVA
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926287
JQ926287
NA
JQ926353
JQ926419
MSK
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926286
JQ926286
NA
JQ926354
JQ926421
Melanconiellameridionalis
MOA
Austria
Ostryacarpinifolia
JQ926289
JQ926289
NA
JQ926355
JQ926422
MOK
Croatia
Ostryacarpinifolia
JQ926290
JQ926290
NA
JQ926356
JQ926423
MOM
Austria
Ostryacarpinifolia
JQ926291
JQ926291
NA
JQ926357
JQ926424
Melanconiellaostryae
CBS 208.38
USA
Ostryavirginiana
JQ926297
JQ926297
NA
JQ926363
JQ926430
Melanconiellaspodiaea
MVS
Croatia
Carpinusorientalis
JQ926299
JQ926299
NA
JQ926365
JQ926432
MSH
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926298
JQ926298
NA
JQ926364
JQ926431
SPOD
Croatia
Carpinusbetulus
JQ926300
JQ926300
NA
JQ926366
JQ926433
Melanconisalni
AR 3529
Russia
Duschekiamaximowiczii
NA
AF362566
NA
NA
NA
AR 3748
Austria
Alnusviridis
EU199195
EU199130
NA
EU199153
NA
AR 4016 = CBS 121480
Austria
Alnusalnobetula
EU254863
NA
NA
EU219298
EU221894
CBS 109773
Austria
Alnusviridis
DQ323523
AF408371
NA
EU219300
EU221896
Melanconisbetulae
CFCC 50471*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
KT732952
KT732971
NA
KT732984
KT733001
CFCC 50472*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
KT732953
KT732972
NA
KT732985
KT733002
CFCC 50473*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
KT732954
KT732973
NA
KT732986
KT733003
Melanconisitalica
MFLUCC 16-1199
Italy
Alnuscordata
MF190151
MF190096
NA
NA
NA
MFLUCC 17-1659
Italy
Alnuscordata
MF190151
MF190097
NA
MF377602
NA
Melanconisitoana
CFCC 50474*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
KT732955
KT732974
NA
KT732987
KT733004
CFCC 52876*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
MK096324
MK096364
NA
MK096409
MK096284
CFCC 52877*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
MK096326
MK096366
NA
MK096411
MK096286
CFCC 52878*
China
Betulaalbosinensis
MK096327
MK096367
NA
MK096412
MK096287
MAFF 410080
Japan
Betulaermanii
JX522738
NA
NA
NA
NA
Melanconismarginalis
AR 3442 = CBS 109744
Canada
Alnusrubra
EU199197
AF408373
NA
EU219301
EU221991
MAFF 410218
Japan
Alnusmaximowiczii
JX522742
NA
NA
NA
NA
Melanconisstilbostoma
CBS 109778 = AR 3501
Austria
Betulapendula
DQ323524
AF408374
NA
EU219299
EU221886
CBS 121894 = MS
NA
Betulapendula
JQ926229
JQ926229
NA
JQ926302
JQ926368
CFCC 50475*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732956
KT732975
NA
KT732988
KT733005
CFCC 50476*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732957
KT732976
NA
KT732989
KT733006
CFCC 50477*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732958
KT732977
NA
KT732990
KT733007
CFCC 50478*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732959
KT732978
NA
KT732991
KT733008
CFCC 50479*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732960
KT732979
NA
KT732992
KT733009
CFCC 50480*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732961
KT732980
NA
KT732993
KT733010
Melanconisstilbostoma
CFCC 50481*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732962
KT732981
NA
KT732994
KT733011
CFCC 50482*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
KT732963
KT732982
NA
KT732995
KT733012
CFCC 52843*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096338
MK096378
NA
MK096423
MK096298
CFCC 52844*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096341
MK096381
NA
MK096426
MK096301
CFCC 52845*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096343
MK096383
NA
MK096428
MK096303
CFCC 52846*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096347
MK096387
NA
MK096432
MK096307
CFCC 52847*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096348
MK096388
NA
MK096433
MK096308
CFCC 52848*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096349
MK096389
NA
MK096434
MK096309
CFCC 52849*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096328
MK096368
NA
MK096413
MK096288
CFCC 52850*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096329
MK096369
NA
MK096414
MK096289
CFCC 52851*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096330
MK096370
NA
MK096415
MK096290
CFCC 52852*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096331
MK096371
NA
MK096416
MK096291
CFCC 52853*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096332
MK096372
NA
MK096417
MK096292
CFCC 52854*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096333
MK096373
NA
MK096418
MK096293
CFCC 52855*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096334
MK096374
NA
MK096419
MK096294
CFCC 52856*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096335
MK096375
NA
MK096420
MK096295
CFCC 52857*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096336
MK096376
NA
MK096421
MK096296
CFCC 52858*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096337
MK096377
NA
MK096422
MK096297
CFCC 52859*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096339
MK096379
NA
MK096424
MK096299
CFCC 52860*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096340
MK096380
NA
MK096425
MK096300
CFCC 52861*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096342
MK096382
NA
MK096427
MK096302
CFCC 52862*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096344
MK096384
NA
MK096429
MK096304
CFCC 52863*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096345
MK096385
NA
MK096430
MK096305
CFCC 52864*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096346
MK096386
NA
MK096431
MK096306
CFCC 52865*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096316
MK096356
NA
MK096401
MK096276
CFCC 52866*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096317
MK096357
NA
MK096402
MK096277
CFCC 52867*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096318
MK096358
NA
MK096403
MK096278
CFCC 52868*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096319
MK096359
NA
MK096404
MK096279
CFCC 52869*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096320
MK096360
NA
MK096405
MK096280
CFCC 52870*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096321
MK096361
NA
MK096406
MK096281
CFCC 52871*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096322
MK096362
NA
MK096407
MK096282
CFCC 52872*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096323
MK096363
NA
MK096408
MK096283
CFCC 52873*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096350
MK096390
NA
MK096435
MK096310
CFCC 52874*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096351
MK096391
NA
MK096436
MK096311
CFCC 52875*
China
Betulaplatyphylla
MK096325
MK096365
NA
MK096410
MK096285
Microascosporafragariae
CBS 118.16
USA
Fragaria sp.
NR156500
NA
NA
NA
NA
CBS 128350
USA
Rubus sp.
JF514854
NA
NA
NA
NA
1-1
China
Fragariaananassa
HM854850
NA
NA
NA
NA
1-2
China
Fragariaananassa
HM854849
NA
NA
NA
NA
1-3
China
Fragariaananassa
HM854852
NA
NA
NA
NA
Microascosporarubi
MFLU 15-1112
Italy
Rubusulmifolia
MF190154
MF190098
NA
MF377581
MF377611
MFLU 17-0883
Italy
Rubusulmifolia
MF190153
MF190099
NA
MF377582
MF377612
Nakataeaoryzae
CBS 243.76
NA
NA
KM484861
DQ341498
NA
NA
NA
Oblongisporothyriumcastanopsidis
ATCC 22470
Japan
Castanopsiscuspidata
MG591850
MG591943
NA
MG592038
MG976454
Ophiodiaporthecyatheae
YMJ1364
China
Cyathealepifera
JX570889
JX570891
NA
JX570893
NA
Pachytrypeprinceps
Rogers S
USA
NA
NA
FJ532382
NA
NA
NA
Pachytryperimosa
FF1066
Costa Rica
NA
NA
FJ532381
NA
NA
NA
Paradiaportheartemisiae
MFLUCC 14-0850
Italy
Artemisia sp.
MF190155
MF190100
NA
NA
NA
MFLUCC 17-1663
Italy
Artemisia sp.
MF190156
MF190101
NA
NA
NA
Phaeoappendisporathailandensis
MFLUCC 13-0161
Thailand
Quercus sp.
MF190157
MF190102
NA
MF377613
NA
Phaeodiaportheappendiculata
CBS 123821 = D77
Austria
Acercampestre
KF570156
KF570156
NA
NA
NA
CBS 123809 = D76
Austria
Acercampestre
KF570155
KF570155
NA
NA
NA
Phragmoportheconformis
AR 3632 = CBS 109783
Canada
Alnusrubra
DQ323527
AF408377
NA
NA
NA
Plagiostomaeuphorbiae
CBS 340.78
Netherlands
Euphorbiapalustris
EU199198
AF408382
NA
DQ368643
NA
Plagiostomasalicellum
AR 3455 = CBS 109775
Austria
Salix sp.
DQ323529
AF408345
NA
EU199141
EU221916
Prosopidicolamexicana
CBS 113530
USA
Prosopisglandulosa
AY720710
NA
NA
NA
NA
CBS 113529
USA
Prosopisglandulosa
AY720709
KX228354
NA
NA
NA
Pseudomelanconiscaryae
CFCC 52110
China
Caryacathayensis
MG682082
MG682022
NA
MG682042
MG682062
CFCC 52111
China
Caryacathayensis
MG682083
MG682023
NA
MG682043
MG682063
CFCC 52112
China
Caryacathayensis
MG682084
MG682024
NA
MG682044
MG682064
CFCC 52113
China
Caryacathayensis
MG682085
MG682025
NA
MG682045
MG682065
Pseudoplagiostomaeucalypti
CBS 124807
Venezuela
Eucalyptusurophylla
GU973512
GU973606
NA
NA
NA
CBS 116382
Thailand
Eucalyptuscamaldulensis
GU973514
GU973608
NA
NA
NA
Pseudoplagiostomaoldii
CBS 115722
Australia
Eucalyptuscamaldulensis
GU973535
GU973610
NA
NA
NA
Pseudoplagiostomavariabile
CBS 113067
Uruguay
Eucalyptusglobulus
GU973536
GU973611
NA
NA
NA
Pyriculariagrisea
Ina168
NA
NA
AB026819
AB026819
NA
NA
NA
Racheliellasaprophytica
NTCL052-1
Thailand
Syzygiumcumini
KJ021933
KJ021935
NA
NA
NA
Racheliellawingfieldiana
CBS 143669
South Africa
Syzigiumguineense
MG591911
MG592006
NA
MG592100
MG976487
Rossmaniaukurunduensis
AR 3484
Russia
Acerukurunduense
NA
EU683075
NA
NA
NA
Saprothyriumthailandense
MFLU 13-0260
Thailand
Decaying leaf
MF190163
MF190110
NA
NA
NA
Sheathosporacornuta
CFCC 51990*
China
Cornuscontroversa
MF360006
MF360008
NA
MF360002
MF360004
CFCC 51991*
China
Juglansregia
MF360007
MF360009
NA
MF360003
MF360005
Silliaferruginea
AR 3440 = CBS 126567
Austria
Corylusavellana
JF681959
EU683076
NA
NA
NA
Sphaerosporithyriummexicanum
CFNL 2945
Mexico
Quercuseduardi
MG591896
MG591990
NA
MG592083
MG976473
Stegonsporiumprotopyriforme
CBS 117041
Austria
Acerpseudoplatanus
NR126119
EU039992
NA
NA
NA
Stegonsporiumpyriforme
CBS 124487
UK
Acerheldreichii
KF570160
KF570160
NA
KF570190
NA
Stilbosporamacrosperma
CBS 121883
Austria
Carpinusbetulus
JX517290
JX517299
NA
KF570196
NA
CBS 121695
Netherlands
Carpinusbetulus
JX517288
JX517297
NA
NA
NA
Sydowielladepressula
CBS 813.79
Switzerland
Rubus sp.
NA
EU683077
NA
NA
NA
Sydowiellafenestrans
AR 3777 = CBS 125530
Russia
Chamerionangustifolium
JF681956
EU683078
NA
NA
NA
Synnemasporellaaculeans
AR 3878 = CBS 126566
USA
Rhusglabra
NA
EU255134
NA
NA
NA
CFCC 52094
China
Rhuschinensis
MG682086
MG682026
NA
MG682046
MG682066
CFCC 52095
China
Rhuschinensis
MG682087
MG682027
NA
MG682047
MG682067
CFCC 52096
China
Rhuschinensis
MG682088
MG682028
NA
MG682048
MG682068
Synnemasporellatoxicodendri
CFCC 52097
China
Toxicodendronsylvestre
MG682089
MG682029
NA
MG682049
MG682069
CFCC 52098
China
Toxicodendronsylvestre
MG682090
MG682030
NA
MG682050
MG682070
CFCC 52099
China
Toxicodendronsylvestre
MG682091
MG682031
NA
MG682051
MG682071
Tubakiajaponica
ATCC 22472
Japan
Castaneacrenata
MG591886
MG591978
NA
MG592071
MG976465
CBS 191.71
Japan
Castaneacrenata
MG591885
MG591977
NA
MG592070
MG976464
MUCC 2297
Japan
Castaneacrenata
NA
MG591979
NA
MG592072
MG976466
MUCC 2298
Japan
Castaneacrenata
NA
MG591980
NA
MG592073
MG976467
MUCC 2300
Japan
Castaneacrenata
NA
MG591981
NA
MG592074
MG976468
MUCC 2301
Japan
Castaneacrenata
NA
MG591982
NA
MG592075
MG976469
Tubakiaseoraksanensis
CBS 127490
South Korea
Quercusmongolica
MG591907
KP260499
NA
MG592094
NA
Tubakiasutoniana
ICMP 14042
New Zealand
Quercus sp.
KC145909
NA
NA
NA
KC145954
ICMP 14043
New Zealand
Quercusilex
KC145858
NA
NA
NA
KC145955
Note: ATCC: American Type Culture Collecton, Virginia, USA; CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre), Utrecht, The Netherlands; CFCC: China Forestry Culture Collection Centre, Beijing, China; CFNL: Herbarium and culture collection at the Faculty of Forestry Sciences, University of Nuevo León, México; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, The Netherlands; ICMP: International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, New Zealand; MFLU: Mae Fah Luang University herbarium, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Thailand; MUCC (Japan): Culture Collection, Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Mie University, Tsu, Mie Prefecture, Japan; NA: not applicable. All the new isolates used in this study are marked by an asterisk (*) and the strains from generic type species are in bold.
Details of the strains included for molecular study used in this study.Note: ATCC: American Type Culture Collecton, Virginia, USA; CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre), Utrecht, The Netherlands; CFCC: China Forestry Culture Collection Centre, Beijing, China; CFNL: Herbarium and culture collection at the Faculty of Forestry Sciences, University of Nuevo León, México; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, The Netherlands; ICMP: International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, New Zealand; MFLU: Mae Fah Luang University herbarium, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Thailand; MUCC (Japan): Culture Collection, Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Mie University, Tsu, Mie Prefecture, Japan; NA: not applicable. All the new isolates used in this study are marked by an asterisk (*) and the strains from generic type species are in bold.
Morphological studies
Species identification was based on morphological features of the ascomata or conidiomata produced on infected plant tissues and micromorphology, supplemented by cultural characteristics. Cross-sections were prepared by hand using a double-edge blade under a dissecting microscope. More than 10 conidiomata/ascomata, 10 asci and/or 50 conidia/ascospores were measured to calculate the mean size and standard deviation (SD). Microscopic photographs were captured with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope equipped with a Nikon digital sight DS-Ri2 high definition colour camera, using differential interference contrast (DIC) illumination and the Nikon software NIS-Elements D Package v. 3.00. Adobe Bridge CS v. 6 and Adobe Photoshop CS v. 5 were used for the manual editing. Nomenclatural novelties and descriptions were deposited in MycoBank (Crous et al. 2004). Colony diameters were measured and the colony colours described after 3 weeks according to the colour charts of Rayner (1970).
DNA extraction and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method, with fungal mycelium harvested from PDA plates with cellophane (Doyle and Doyle 1990). The DNA was estimated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel and the quality was measured by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo, USA) according to the user’s manual (Desjardins et al. 2009). The PCR amplifications were performed in DNA Engine (PTC-200) Peltier Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA). The ITS region was amplified with the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990), the LSU region with the primers LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), the CAL gene (for ) with primers CAL-228F and CAL-737R (Carbone and Kohn 1999), the RPB2 region with primers PageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakfRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), the TEF1-α gene with the primers EF1-728F and EF1-LLErev for (Carbone and Kohn 1999, Jaklitsch et al. 2005) and the primers EF1-983F and EF1-1567R for (Carbone and Kohn 1999, Rehner and Buckley 2005). The PCR mixture for all the regions consisted of 1 μl genomic DNA, 3 mM MgCl2, 20 μM of each dNTP, 0.2 μM of each primer and 0.25 U BIOTAQ DNA polymerase (Bioline). Conditions for PCR of ITS and LSU regions constituted an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 51 °C and 1 min at 72 °C and a final extension step of 8 min at 72 °C, while the TEF1-α gene was performed using an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 56 °C and 1 min at 72 °C and a final extension step of 8 min at 72 °C. For the RPB2 amplification, conditions consisted of five cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 56 °C and 2 min at 72 °C, then five cycles with a 53 °C annealing temperature and 30 cycles with a 50 °C annealing temperature. The DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM 3730XL DNA Analyzer with BigDye Terminater Kit v. 3.1 (Invitrogen) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China).
Phylogenetic analyses
DNA sequences generated by each primer combination were used to obtain consensus sequences using SeqMan v. 7.1.0 in the DNASTAR Lasergene Core Suite software package (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Reference sequences were selected based on ex-type or ex-epitype sequences available from relevant published literature (Voglmayr et al. 2012, 2017, Fan et al. 2016, 2018, Du et al. 2017, Senanayake et al. 2017) (Table 1). All sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html) and edited manually using MEGA v. 6 (Tamura et al. 2013). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using PAUP v. 4.0b10 for maximum parsimony (MP) analysis (Swofford 2003), MrBayes v. 3.1.2 for Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) and PhyML v. 7.2.8 for Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis (Guindon et al. 2010). The first analyses were performed on the combined multi-gene dataset (ITS, LSU, RPB2, TEF1-α) to compare isolates of species to ex-type sequence data from recent studies (Table 1).A partition homogeneity test (PHT) with heuristic search and 1 000 search replicates was performed using PAUP to test for incongruence amongst the ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α sequence datasets in reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was run using 1 000 heuristic search replicates with random-additions of sequences with a tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) algorithm. Maxtrees were set to 5 000, branches of zero length were collapsed and all equally parsimonious trees were saved. Other calculated parsimony scores were tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI) and rescaled consistency (RC). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed with a GTR site substitution model, including a gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites PageBreak(Guindon et al. 2010). The branch support was evaluated with a bootstrapping (BS) method of 1 000 replicates.MrModeltest v. 2.3 was used to estimate the best nucleotide substitution model settings for each gene (Posada and Crandall 1998). Bayesian inference (BI) was performed based on the DNA dataset from the results of the MrModeltest, using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm in MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Two MCMC chains were run from random trees for 1 000 M generations and stopped when the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. Trees were saved each 1 000 generations. The first 25% of trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of each analysis and the posterior probabilities (BPP) were calculated from the remaining trees (Rannala and Yang 1996).In addition to the above analyses, we provided separate phylogenetic trees for , and , based on various gene regions (see below) and the same analyses parameters as given above. Phylograms were edited using FigTree v. 1.3.1 (Rambaut and Drummond 2010). Novel sequences generated in the current study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). The aligned matrices used for phylogenetic analyses and the resulting trees can be found in TreeBASE (www.treebase.org; accession number: S23477).
Results
The combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α of included 209 ingroup and two outgroup taxa, comprising 3 269 characters including gaps (776 characters for ITS, 517 for LSU, 1107 for RPB2 and 869 for TEF1-α) in the aligned matrix. Of these, 1 417 characters were constant, 192 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative and 1 660 characters were parsimony informative. The MP analysis resulted in 100 most parsimonious trees (TL = 10 370, CI = 0.341, RI = 0.806, RC = 0.275) and the first tree is shown as Fig. 1. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Branches with significant Bayesian posterior probability (≥ 0.95) in Bayesian analyses were thickened in the phylogenetic tree. The phylogram based on four genes resolved 28 known lineages, representing 26 known families and two incertae sedis genera and due to lack of sequence data on their types. The current 47 melanconis-like isolates are herein placed within , and in (Fig. 1). A phylogenetic tree of each family or genus was constructed separately based on different DNA datasets. Tree topologies of all genera computed from the MP, ML and Bayesian analyses were similar for the individual gene region and in the combined dataset.
Figure 1.
Phylogram of obtained from an MP analysis of a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 200 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.
Phylogram of obtained from an MP analysis of a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 200 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.For the single genus (), a combined ITS, LSU, CAL and RPB2 matrix of 23 ingroup accessions (five from this study and 18 retrieved from PageBreakPageBreakGenBank) was produced, which comprised 2 736 characters including gaps (2 427 constant, 216 variable and parsimony-uninformative, 93 parsimony-informative). A heuristic MP search generated nine equally most parsimonious trees (TL = 332, CI = 0.976, RI = 0.985, RC = 0.961), one of which is shown in Fig. 2. Isolates of clustered in four clades, corresponding to the four known species in this genus. PageBreakThe five Chinese strains sequenced in this study were revealed to belong to (3) and (2).
Figure 2.
Phylogram of () obtained from an MP analysis of a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, CAL and RPB2. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 20 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.
Phylogram of () obtained from an MP analysis of a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, CAL and RPB2. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 20 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.For , a combined ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α matrix was produced from 53 ingroup accessions (six from this study and 47 retrieved from GenBank), which comprised 4 122 characters including gaps (2 829 constant, 87 variable and parsimony-uninformative, 1 206 parsimony-informative). A heuristic MP search generated 24 most parsimonious trees (TL = 2 716, CI = 0.652, RI = 0.880, RC = 0.573), one of which is shown in Fig. 5. Isolates of clustered in three clades, corresponding to the type genus , and a linePageBreakage described as the new genus below. and formed two distinct strongly supported clades (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1), which differ from the other species of the clade.
Figure 5.
Phylogram of () obtained from an MP analysis of a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 20 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.
For the single genus (), a combined ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α matrix was produced for 57 ingroup accessions (49 from this study and eight retrieved from GenBank), which comprised 2 597 characters including gaps (2 238 constant, 219 variable and parsimony-uninformative, 140 parsimony-informative). A heuristic MP search generated 144 most parsimonious trees (TL = 459, CI = 0.861, RI = 0.919, RC = 0.791), one of which is shown in Fig. 6. Isolates of clustered in six clades, corresponding to six known species in this genus. , and were confirmed from China in this study.
Figure 6.
Phylogram of obtained from an MP analysis from a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 80 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.
Taxonomy
Voglmayr & Jaklitsch, Persoonia 38: 142 (2017)
Type genus.
Voglmayr & Jaklitsch, Persoonia 38: 142 (2017)
Notes.
, with the single genus , was newly introduced by Voglmayr et al. (2017) for , and . In this paper, we provide an updated tree including accessions of two species from China (Fig. 2).Voglmayr & Jaklitsch, Persoonia 38: 142 (2017)
Type species.
(Kunze) Voglmayr & Jaklitsch, Persoonia 38: 144 (2017).was newly introduced by Voglmayr et al. (2017). The genus is characterised by having perithecial ascomata, octosporous asci with an apical ring, hyaline, bicellular ascospores with or without gelatinous appendages and acervular conidiomata with brown conidia with gelatinous sheaths and with verruculous inner surface of the conidal wall (Voglmayr et al. 2017). includes four species (, , and ), which were restricted to host in (Voglmayr et al. 2017).(Kunze) Voglmayr & Jaklitsch, Persoonia 38: 144 (2017)Fig. 3
Figure 3.
Morphology of from . A–B habit of acervuli on branches C transverse section through acervulus D longitudinal section through acervulus E–F conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm (A–D), 20 μm (E–F).
≡
Descriptions.
Conidiomata acervular, immersed in host bark, erumpent from surface of host branches, scattered or occasionally confluent, 1.5–2.5 mm, covered by black discharged conidial masses at maturity, usually conspicuous. Ectostromatic disc straw to honey, surrounded by bark or not. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical, straw to buff. Conidiophores cylindrical to lageniform, simple, rarely branched at the base, smooth, subhyaline to pale brown. Conidiogenous cells annellidic with distinct annellations, integrated. Conidia unicellular, initially hyaline, becoming brown to blackish when mature, broadly ellipsoid to broadly pip-shaped, truncate with distinct scar at the base, densely multiguttulate, thick-walled, (17–)19–22(–24.5) × (9–)11–14(–16.5) μm (av. = 20 × 13 μm, n = 50), with 0.8–1 µm wide gelatinous sheath. Sexual morph was not observed.Morphology of from . A–B habit of acervuli on branches C transverse section through acervulus D longitudinal section through acervulus E–F conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm (A–D), 20 μm (E–F).
Culture characteristics.
On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming straw after 3–5 d and grey olivaceous after 7–10 d. The colonies are felty with an irregular edge; sterile.
Materials examined.
(all on twigs and branches of ). CHINA, Gansu Province, Qingyang City, Shishe village, , 14 July 2013, X.L. Fan (BJFC-S908; living culture, CFCC 51727); Gansu Province, Qingyang City, Zhongwan Forest Farm, , 11 July 2013, X.L. Fan (BJFC-S947; living culture, CFCC 51728); Gansu Province, Qingyang City, Zhongwan Forest Farm, , 11 July 2013, X.L. Fan (BJFC-S955; living culture, CFCC 51729).is the type species of and is thus far only known to occur on distributed in Asia and Europe (Voglmayr et al. 2017). is described based on (= ) (Voglmayr et al. 2017), which was regarded as the main causal agent of canker and dieback disease of in China (China Microbiology and Virology Databases, http://www.micro.csdb.cn/).(Berk.) Voglmayr & Jaklitsch, Persoonia 38: 147 (2017)Fig. 4
Figure 4.
Morphology of from . A–B habit of acervuli on branches C transverse section through acervulus D longitudinal section through perithecia E longitudinal section through acervulus F conidiophores, conidiogenous cells G conidia H asci and ascospores I ascospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (A), 500 μm (B–E), 20 μm (F–I).
≡=≡Pseudostromata immersed in host bark, distinctly erumpent from surface of host branches, 1.5–3 mm diam. Ectostromatic disc indistinct, usually circular, greyish to brownish. Perithecia often appearing as rounded bumps beneath the bark surface surrounding the ectostromatic disc, prolonged black neck from the top, (450–)525–700(–780) µm diam. (av. = 580 μm, n = 30). Asci hyaline, clavate to fusoid, (120–)122–135 × (12.5–)13–16.5 (–17) μm (av. = 126.5 × 15 μm, n = 20). Ascospores hyaline, ellipsoid, broadly ellipsoid or broadly fusoid, symmetric to slightly asymmetric, straight, rarely slightly curved, constricted at the septum, (17–)17.5–22(–23.5) × (7.5–)8–10.5(–11) μm (av. = 19.5 × 9.5 μm, n = 50). Conidiomata acervular, immersed in host bark, erumpent from surface of host branches, scattered or occasionally confluent, 1–2 mm, covered by black discharged conidial masses at maturity, usually conspicuous. Ectostromatic disc buff to honey, surrounded by bark or not. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical, isabelline to olivaceous grey. Conidiophores cylindrical to lageniform, simple, rarely branched at the base, smooth, subhyaline to pale brown. Conidiogenous cells annellidic with distinct annellations, integrated. Conidia unicellular, initially hyaline, becoming brown to blackish when mature, broadly ellipsoid to broadly pip-shaped, truncate with distinct scar at the base, densely multiguttulate, thick-walled, (14–)19–23.5(–28) × (6.5–)9–13(–15) μm (av. = 22 × 12.5 μm, n = 50), with 0.8–1 µm wide gelatinous sheath.Morphology of from . A–B habit of acervuli on branches C transverse section through acervulus D longitudinal section through perithecia E longitudinal section through acervulus F conidiophores, conidiogenous cells G conidia H asci and ascospores I ascospores. Scale bars: 10 mm (A), 500 μm (B–E), 20 μm (F–I).On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming pale olivaceous grey after 10 d. The colonies are felty with an irregular edge; texture uniform; sterile.(all on twigs and branches of ). CHINA, Heilongjiang Province, Harbin City, Linan, Heilongjiang Botanical Garden, , 2 August 2016, Q. Yang & Z. Du (BJFC-S1374; living culture, CFCC 51725; ibid.CFCC 51726).is based on (= ) (Voglmayr et al. 2017). This species can be distinguished from by on average longer length of conidia (22 × 12.5 vs.> 20 × 13 µm). However, there is a substantial size overlap between both species and sequence data are sometimes necessary for reliable species identification. It was also recorded to cause canker and dieback disease of in China (China Microbiology and Virology Databases, http://www.micro.csdb.cn/).G. Winter, Rabenh. Krypt.-Fl., Edn 2 (Leipzig) 1.2: 764 (1886)Tul. & C. Tul., Select. fung. carpol. (Paris) 2: 115 (1863)was introduced by Winter (1886) and subsequently involved many genera with perithecia immersed in a well-developed stroma with ostioles (beaks) that emerge through an ectostromatic disc (Barr 1978). Castlebury et al. (2002) and Rossman et al. (2007) reduced this family to the type genus based on LSU rDNA sequences. In this paper, we provide an updated tree with additional isolates of () from China (Fig. 5). All species have been described and illustrated by Fan et al. (2016).Phylogram of () obtained from an MP analysis of a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 20 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.Tul. & C. Tul., Select. fung. carpol. (Paris) 2: 115 (1863)(Fr.) Tul. & C. Tul., Select. fung. carpol. (Paris) 2: 115 (1863)The type genus was established by Tulasne and Tulasne (1863) based on Fr. This genus is characterised by circularly arranged perithecia immersed in well developed to reduced entostromata with a concolourous central column and ostioles erumpent through a light-coloured ectostromatic disc with hyaline, one-septate ascospores; acervuli with light-coloured central column producing brown to olive-brown, fusiform to pyriform alpha conidia and hyaline, cylindrical or allantoid beta conidia (Barr 1978; Castlebury et al. 2002; Voglmayr et al. 2012; Fan et al. 2016). has approximately 105 species epithets recorded in Index Fungorum (2018), whereas Rossman et al. (2007) suggested that many of the species previously residing in may belong somewhere else. Fan et al. (2016) provided an account on this genus including five species (, , , and the type species ), which were restricted to hosts in .C.M. Tian & X.L. Fan, Mycol. Progr. 15(4/40): 4 (2016)(all on twigs and branches of ). CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Zhouqu County, Qiban Forestry Centre, , 20 August 2014, Y.M. Liang (BJFC-S1319, holotype; living ex-type culture, CFCC 50471); Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Zhouqu County, Qiban Forestry Centre, , 20 August 2014, Y.M. Liang (BJFC-S13200; living culture, CFCC 50472); Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Zhouqu County, Qiban Forestry Centre, , 20 August 2014, Y.M. Liang (BJFC-S1321; living culture, CFCC 50473).was described from (Fan et al. 2016). Morphologically, is characterised by ovoid, olive-brown, aseptate alpha conidia, which are different from other species but similar to the type species . However, it can be distinguished by the smaller length of its alpha conidia (10 vs.> 12 μm) and sequence data.Tak. Kobay., Bull. Govt Forest Exp. Stn Meguro 226: 19 (1970)(all on twigs and branches of ). CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Zhouqu County, Qiban Forestry Centre, , 20 August 2014, X.L. Fan (BJFC-S1322; living culture, CFCC 50474); Shaanxi Province, Ankang City, Ningshan County, Huoditang Forest Farm, , 3 August 2015, Q. Yang (BJFC-S1349; living culture, CFCC 52877; ibid, CFCC 52878); Jilin Province, Jiaohe City, Haiqing Forest Farm, , 26 June 2017, X.W. Wang (CF 20170668; living culture, CFCC 52876).was described from in Japan (Kobayashi 1970). Fan et al. (2016) isolated it from as a new record in China. is characterised by fusoid, green-brown alpha conidia with acute ends (13 × 4 μm) and hyaline, cylindrical or crescent beta conidia (9.5 × 1.5 μm).(Fr.) Tul. & C. Tul., Select. fung. carpol. (Paris) 2: 115 (1863)(all on twigs and branches of ). CHINA, Tibet Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Juemu Valley, , 22 July 2016, X.L. Fan (CF 20160703; living culture, CFCC 528433); Heilongjiang Province, Yichun City, Dailing District, Liangshui Natural Reserve, , 29 July 2016, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 20161703; living culture, CFCC 52867); Heilongjiang Province, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Botanical Garden, , 2 August 2016, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 20161709; living culture, CFCC 52868); Qinghai Province, Menyuan City, Xianmi Forest Farm, PageBreak, 3 September 2016, J.H. Zuo (CF 20160911; living culture, CFCC 52865); Ningxia Autonomous Region, Yinchuan City, Helan County, Taihedizhonghai, , 5 August 2015, X.L. Fan & Z. Du (CF 20150802; living culture, CFCC 52873); Ningxia Autonomous Region, Jingyuan City, Jingguan Road, , 13 August 2014, X.L. Fan & Z. Du (BJFC-S1324; living culture, CFCC 50476); Beijing City, Tongzhou District, Song Village, , 20 May 2015, X.L. Fan (BJFC-S1325; living culture, CFCC 50477); other materials with similar locations and hosts are listed in Table 1.is the type species of and is thus far only known to occur on spp. with a worldwide distribution (Fan et al. 2016). , and are recorded as hosts in China (Zhuang 2005). The current investigation suggested that this species is restricted to and widespread on in China.Senan., Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde, Stud. Mycol. 86: 275 (2017)Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 740 (1882)was validated by Senanayake et al. (2017) for the invalid of Locquin (1984). Senanayake et al. (2017) emended this family to accommodate , , , and . Braun et al. (2018) recommended an exclusion of , and . In this paper, we introduce the new genus and two new species of in (Fig. 6).Phylogram of obtained from an MP analysis from a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Scale bar = 80 changes. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue.Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 740 (1882)(Tul. & C. Tul.) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 740 (1882)The genus was established by Saccardo (1882) for two species, Tul. & C. Tul. and (Fr.) Tul. & C. Tul. The genus subsequently entered a long period of confusion with a broad concept of the melanconidaceous genera and Tul. & C. Tul. (Wehmeyer 1937, 1941; Barr 1987). has 37 species epithets recorded in Index Fungorum (2018). Voglmayr et al. (2012) revised the generic circumscriptions of with 13 accepted species, excluded numerous species and confirmed that it is genetically distinct from the genus based on morphology and multi-gene phylogeny (ITS, LSU, RPB2 and TEF1-α). is characterised by forming circularly arranged perithecia immersed in the substrate with oblique or lateral ostioles convergent and erumpent through an ectostromatic disc with dark coloured or hyaline ascospores; acervuli with light-coloured central column, producing dark brown melanconium-like or hyaline discosporina-like conidia (not in the same species) (Barr 1978; PageBreakVoglmayr et al. 2012). species were observed to be highly host-specific, as they were found to be confined to a single genus or sometimes even species within the host family from Europe and North America (Voglmayr et al. 2012).Fan
sp. nov.828427Fig. 7
Figure 7.
Morphology of from . A–B habit of pseudostromata on branches C transverse section through perithecia D longitudinal section through perithecia E–F habit of acervuli on branches G transverse section through acervulus H longitudinal section through acervulus I asci and ascospores J–K ascus and ascospores L–O ascospores P conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia Q conidia. Scale bars: 2 mm (A, E), 500 μm (B–D, F–H), 10 μm (J–K, P–Q), 5 μm (L–O).
Etymology.
(Lat.): referring to the host genus on which it was collected, .
Diagnosis.
This species is distinguished by hyaline ascospores, (16.5–)18–22(–24) × (3–)4–6 μm, with slightly constricted at the septum and with hyaline broad cap-like appendages at both ends.
Holotype.
CHINA. Shaanxi Province: Ningshan County, Huoditang Forest Farm, Huodi Valley, , 3 August 2015, on twigs and branches of , Q. Yang (BJFC-S1347 holotype; living culture, CFCC 52482).Pseudostromata inconspicuous, immersed in host bark, slightly erumpent from surface of host branches, 1.5–3 mm diam. Ectostromatic disc indistinct, usually circular, buff to hazel. Central column circular, mouse grey to iron grey. Ostioles numerous, violaceous black to black, scarcely projecting, 70–150 μm diam. Perithecia flask-shaped to spherical, arranged circularly or irregularly, 7–12 per disc, often appearing as rounded bumps beneath the bark surface surrounding the ectostromatic disc, (320–)350–550(–610) µm diam. (av. = 480 μm, n = 30). Asci hyaline, clavate to fusoid, (50–)55–65(–70) × (7–)8.5–14(–16) μm (av. = 60 × 11 μm, n = 20). Ascospores hyaline, ellipsoid, broadly ellipsoid or broadly fusoid, 2–4 guttulate, symmetric to slightly asymmetric, straight, rarely slightly curved, slightly constricted at the septum, (16.5–)18–22(–24) × (3–)4–6 μm (av. = 20 × 4.5 μm, n = 50), with hyaline broad cap-like appendages at both ends. Conidiomata acervular, immersed in host bark, erumpent from surface of host branches, scattered or occasionally confluent, 1.3–2.5 mm, covered by fawn to dark brick discharged conidial masses at maturity, usually conspicuous. Ectostromatic disc inconspicuous. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical, olivaceous grey to iron grey. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, cylindrical to lageniform, simple, rarely branched at the base. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, phialidic. Conidia unicellular, hyaline, narrowly ellipsoid, elongate to slightly allantoid, (9.5–)10–13.5(–15) × (2–)3–4.5(–5.5) μm (av. = 13 × 3.5 µm, n = 50), with 0.5 µm wide gelatinous sheath.Morphology of from . A–B habit of pseudostromata on branches C transverse section through perithecia D longitudinal section through perithecia E–F habit of acervuli on branches G transverse section through acervulus H longitudinal section through acervulus I asci and ascospores J–K ascus and ascospores L–O ascospores P conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia Q conidia. Scale bars: 2 mm (A, E), 500 μm (B–D, F–H), 10 μm (J–K, P–Q), 5 μm (L–O).On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming greyish-sepia after 3 d and distensible radially after 10 d. The colonies are felty with an irregular edge; texture uniform; sterile.
Additional material examined.
CHINA. Shaanxi Province: Ningshan County, Huoditang Forest Farm, Huodi Valley, , 3 August 2015, on twigs and branches of , Q. Yang (CF 20150847; living culture, CFCC 52483);is associated with canker disease of in China. It is similar to but differs by larger ascospores (18–22 × 4–6 vs.> 12.5–16 × 4.0–5.5 μm) with hyaline, broad cap-like appendages at both ends (Voglmayr et al. 2012), distribution (China vs.> eastern North America) and a different host, . also occurs on (in Europe and North America) and it can be distinguished from based on dark brown ascospores without appendages and dark brown conidia (VoglPageBreakmayr et al. 2012). The clear phylogenetic position confirmed a distinction from all other available strains included in this study and we therefore result in our decision to describe this species as new, based on DNA sequence data and morphology.Fan
sp. nov.828428Fig. 8
Figure 8.
Morphology of from . A habit of acervuli on branches B–F process of development of acervulus G transverse section through acervulus H–I longitudinal section through acervulus J conidiophores K conidiogenous cells and conidia L–W conidia. Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 500 μm (B–I), 10 μm (J–K), 5 μm (L–W).
corylina (Lat.): referring to the host genus on which it was collected, .This species is distinguished by acervuli erumpent through circularly cracked host bark and covered by olivaceous buff to honey discharged conidial masses at maturity; conidia unicellular, hyaline, with various shapes and 1–3 guttulate, (7–)8–13.5(–14.5) × (2–)2.5–4(–5) μm.Morphology of from . A habit of acervuli on branches B–F process of development of acervulus G transverse section through acervulus H–I longitudinal section through acervulus J conidiophores K conidiogenous cells and conidia L–W conidia. Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 500 μm (B–I), 10 μm (J–K), 5 μm (L–W).CHINA. Shaanxi Province: Baoji County, Taibai Mountain, , 13 July 2017, on twigs and branches of , N. Jiang (BJFC-FB56 holotype; living culture, CFCC 52484).Conidiomata acervular, immersed in host bark, erumpent from surface of host branches, scattered or occasionally confluent, 1–1.5 mm, erumpent through circularly cracked host bark and covered by olivaceous buff to honey discharged conidial masses at maturity, usually conspicuous. Ectostromatic disc inconspicuous and cracked circularly at maturity. Central column beneath the disc more or less oblate, iron grey to dark grey. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, simple, rarely branched at the base. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, phialidic. Conidia unicellular, hyaline, narrowly ellipsoid to fusoid, elongate to slightly allantoid, 1–3 guttulate, (7–)8–13.5(–14.5) × (2–)2.5–4(–5) μm (av. = 10 × 3.5 µm, n = 50) μm (av. = 13 × 3.5 µm, n = 50). Sexual morph was not observed.On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming fuscous black in the centre and edge after 5 d. The colonies are felty with an irregular edge; texture uniform; sterile.CHINA. Shaanxi Province: Baoji County, Taibai Mountain, , 13 July 2017, on twigs and branches of , N. Jiang (CF 20170756 holotype; living culture, CFCC 52485).is associated with canker disease of in China. It can be distinguished from its closest relative, the generic type growing in spp., by its hyaline, discosporina-like conidia, and the smaller size of conidia (8–13.5 × 2.5–4 vs.> 13.3–15.2 × 7.5–8.5 μm) as well as the hosts (Voglmayr et al. 2012). also occurs on (in Europe and North America), and it can be distinguished from based on larger conidia (12–15 × 5.0–5.5 vs.> 8–13.5 ×2.5–4 μm) (Voglmayr et al. 2012). The phylogenetic inferences indicated as an individual well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI=100/99/1) within and we therefore describe it as new, based on sequence data and morphology.Fan
gen. nov.828429(Lat.): referring to the conidia with distinct hyaline sheath.This genus differs from other genera in by conical and discrete pycnidia with aseptate, cylindrical to ellipsoidal conidia with distinct hyaline sheath.(C.M. Tian & Z. Du) Fan.Conidiomata pycnidial, immersed in host bark, erumpent through the surface of host branches. Ectostromatic disc inconspicuous and exPageBreaktended to form a beak at maturity. Central column absent. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, simple, rarely branched at the base. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, phialidic. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, with distinct hyaline sheath. Sexual morph was not observed.is established for , which was previously included in the clade (Voglmayr et al. 2012; Du et al. 2017). Morphologically, it differs from other genera in by pycnidial conidiomata and conidia with distinct hyaline sheath. In our phylogenetic analyses, formed a distinct clade basal to within . Based on morphology and different hosts ( and vs. ), it is here excluded from and transferred to the new genus In our revised circumscription, include three genera named , and .(C.M. Tian & Z. Du) Fan
comb. nov.828430Fig. 9
Figure 9.
Morphology of from . A–B Habit of pycnidia on branches C–D transverse section through pycnidium E longitudinal section through pycnidium F conidiophores, conidiogenous cells G conidia. Scale bars: 5 mm (A), 1 mm (B), 500 μm (C–E), 20 μm (F–G).
Basionym.
C.M. Tian & Z. Du, Phytotaxa 327(3): 257 (2017)This species is distinguished by conical and discrete pycnidia without central column and aseptate, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, (19–)19.5–22.5(–23) × (8–)8.5–10.5(–11) μm conidia, with a distinct hyaline sheath 1–1.5 μm wide.CHINA. Shaanxi Province: Ankang City, Ningshan County, Huoditang Forest Farm, , 3 July 2016, on twigs and branches of , X.L. Fan (BJFC-S1375 holotype; living ex-type culture CFCC 51990).Conidiomata pycnidial, immersed in host bark, conical, with single necks erumpent through the surface of host branches, scattered, (250–)270–330(–410) μm (av. = 300 μm, n = 20) diam. Ectostromatic disc inconspicuous and extended to form a beak at maturity, pale luteous to amber. Central column absent. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, simple, rarely branched at the base, 17–24(–25) × 2.5–4(–4.5) μm (av. = 21.5 × 3.5 µm, n = 50). Conidiogenous cells hyaline, phialidic. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, (19–)19.5–22.5(–23) × (8–)8.5–10.5(–11) μm (av. = 21 × 10 µm, n = 50), with distinct hyaline sheath, 1–1.5 μm wide at maturity. Sexual morph was not observed.Morphology of from . A–B Habit of pycnidia on branches C–D transverse section through pycnidium E longitudinal section through pycnidium F conidiophores, conidiogenous cells G conidia. Scale bars: 5 mm (A), 1 mm (B), 500 μm (C–E), 20 μm (F–G).Colony growth on PDA originally white, becoming pale yellowish after 7–10 days. Colony flat, felty-like, with a uniform texture and yellowish to dark brown conidiomata irregularly scattered on the colony surface.
Additional specimens examined (paratypes).
CHINA. Shaanxi Province: Ankang City, Ningshan County, Huoditang Forest Farm, , 3 August 2015, on twigs and branches of , Q. Yang (BJFC-S1345 paratype; living ex-paratype culture CFCC 51991).is proposed here as a new combination for . It is the type and currently only species of and so far known from and in China. The sexual morph of this species is unknown and further collections are required to elucidate its life cycle.
Discussion
During the investigation of melanconis-like fungi in China, we identified eight species residing in three families (, and ) of . It includes , , , , , the two new species and and the new combination in the new genus .All specimens in the current study were collected from symptomatic branches and twigs associated with canker or dieback diseases, of which () species were isolated from (), () species from and () and () species from and (). It may indicate that many melanconis-like species have obvious host specificity. The type species of the new genus () was isolated from () and (), suggesting a low host specificity and that additional undiscovered hosts species of this taxon may exist in China.As the morphological features in previous melanconis-like fungi are highly overlapping, phylogenetic studies using DNA sequences have been useful to elucidate the diversity and systematics in this group. The current results indicated that and are still unique, the only genera in and , respectively, due to the lacking of extensive fresh collections. The family was recently proposed by Senanayake et al. (2017) to accommodate , , , and based on morphological features and phylogenetic analyses. In this study, the phylogenetic affinity of , and was evaluated in (Fig. 1), which conformed to the recently described family Tubakiaceae () (Braun et al. 2018). We here establish a new genus within , , which is characterised by typical diaporthalean-like pycnidia and aseptate, cylindrical to ellipsoidal conidia with distinct hyaline sheath. Thus is here restricted to the three genera , and (Fig. 6).As shown in this paper, future studies addressing the fungal diversity associated with canker or dieback diseases should routinely include sequence data for protein-coding genes to achieve stable, supported topologies in phylogenetic trees. It is hoped that the classification proposed here will also provide an updated phylogenetic framework that will facilitate further revision of the families with melanconis-like asexual morphs. Although the current study provides additional new data on melanconis-like genera, typification, species concept and taxonomic affiliation of many described species are yet unclear, including the type species , which currently represents a doubtful taxon (Rossman et al. 2015). In addition, sequence data are missing for most described species. Thus, a thorough revision of the genus based on robust sampling, reliable identification, cultures and DNA data is urgently needed. The fact that new records and species from three related families of were recorded in China further suggests that Asia may harbour many more species awaiting collections and descriptions.