Literature DB >> 30563688

Patients with borderline personality disorder and comorbid PTSD show biased attention for threat in the facial dot-probe task.

Deborah Kaiser1, Gitta A Jacob2, Linda van Zutphen3, Nicolette Siep3, Andreas Sprenger4, Brunna Tuschen-Caffier5, Alena Senft6, Arnoud Arntz7, Gregor Domes8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Biased attention to threat is likely to play a crucial role in the dysfunctional emotion-related information processing in borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, the role of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has not yet been fully disentangled.
METHODS: BPD patients with (n = 24) and without (n = 46) PTSD, 35 patients with Cluster-C personality disorder and 52 non-patients participated in the facial dot-probe task with angry, happy and neutral faces during automatic (100 ms), controlled (600 ms), and later (1200 ms) stages of information processing.
RESULTS: BPD patients showed a greater congruency effect to angry faces during the controlled stage of processing than controls. Specifically, in BPD with PTSD compared to controls, this effect was due to difficulties disengaging from threat, indicated by slower reaction times to incongruent angry targets compared to neutral trials. Regarding automatic and later stages of information processing, there was no attentional bias (AB) in BPD. None of the groups revealed biased attention for happy faces at any stages of information processing. LIMITATIONS: We did not include a control group of PTSD patients without BPD. Therefore, we cannot rule out that the present AB in BPD is mainly due to PTSD-specific psychopathology.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide first evidence for an AB towards angry faces and difficulties disengaging from these threat-related social cues in adult BPD patients. Although BPD patients in general demonstrated an AB when compared with controls, this effect was especially pronounced for BPD with PTSD, suggesting a significant effect of trauma-related psychopathology on social attention in BPD.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Borderline personality disorder; Cluster-C personality disorder; Emotion; Facial dot-probe task; Facial expressions; Posttraumatic stress disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30563688     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0005-7916


  4 in total

1.  Severity of childhood maltreatment predicts reaction times and heart rate variability during an emotional working memory task in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Annegret Krause-Utz; Julia-Caroline Walther; Akrivi I Kyrgiou; William Hoogenboom; Myrto Alampanou; Martin Bohus; Christian Schmahl; Stefanie Lis
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  A comprehensive evaluation of emotional responsiveness in borderline personality disorder: a support for hypersensitivity hypothesis.

Authors:  Roberta Bortolla; Marco Cavicchioli; Marco Galli; Paul F M J Verschure; Cesare Maffei
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2019-05-09

3.  Posttraumatic stress symptom severity is associated with impaired processing of emotional faces in a large international sample.

Authors:  Lauren A Rutter; Colton Lind; Jacqueline Howard; Prabhvir Lakhan; Laura Germine
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Acute Psychosocial Stress Modulates the Detection Sensitivity for Facial Emotions.

Authors:  Bernadette von Dawans; Ines Spenthof; Patrick Zimmer; Gregor Domes
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2020-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.