Christopher S Walter1, Caitlin R Hengge2, Bergen E Lindauer2, Sydney Y Schaefer3. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, 1125 N. College Avenue, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72703, USA. 2. University of Utah, 50 N. Medical Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. 3. University of Utah, 50 N. Medical Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, 501 E. Tyler Mall, ECG 334A, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. Electronic address: sydney.schaefer@asu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age-related declines in function can limit older adults' independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. METHODS:Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of afunctional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. RESULTS: No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Age-related declines in function can limit older adults' independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. METHODS: Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of a functional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. RESULTS: No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.
Authors: Carl V Granger; Samuel J Markello; James E Graham; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Serene S Paul; Leland E Dibble; Genevieve N Olivier; Christopher Walter; Kevin Duff; Sydney Y Schaefer Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Christopher S Walter; Caitlin R Hengge; Sydney Y Schaefer Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Geneviève N Olivier; Christopher S Walter; Serene S Paul; Leland E Dibble; Sydney Y Schaefer Journal: Motor Control Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: Elizabeth Regan; Julius Fridriksson; Sydney Y Schaefer; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Jill Campbell Stewart Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Vishvak Rangarajan; Joseph J Schreiber; Beatriz Barragan; Sydney Y Schaefer; Claire F Honeycutt Journal: Front Neural Circuits Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Cielita Lopez-Lennon; Serene S Paul; Leland E Dibble; Kevin Duff; Sydney Y Schaefer Journal: Front Rehabil Sci Date: 2021-10-22
Authors: Alice Haniuda Moliterno; Fernanda Vieira Bezerra; Louanne Angélica Pires; Sarah Santos Roncolato; Talita Dias da Silva; Thais Massetti; Deborah Cristina Gonçalves Luiz Fernani; Fernando Henrique Magalhães; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro; Maria Tereza Artero Prado Dantas Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 3.411