Literature DB >> 30562205

Muscle-Splitting Augmentation-Mastopexy: Implant Protection With an Inferior Dermoglandular Flap.

Rubem Lang Stümpfle, Pedro Salomão Piccinini1, Lucas Figueras Pereira-Lima2, André Alves Valiati.   

Abstract

Simultaneous augmentation-mastopexy can achieve excellent patient and surgeon satisfaction but continues to pose a challenge, with revision rates of up to 25%. Recurrent ptosis and poor overall breast shape are 2 common reasons for reoperation, whereas some of the most feared complications is breast implant exposure, infection, and loss secondary to wound breakdown; excessively large implants or too much tension during closure are possible contributing factors. We describe a technique for augmentation-mastopexy combining a muscle-splitting pocket for implant placement along with an inferior flap, which helps secure the implant in place and provides coverage in case of wound dehiscence. A retrospective chart review was performed (January 2015 to December 2017) of women who underwent augmentation-mastopexy with round, textured silicone gel implants using a muscle-splitting technique combined with an inferior de-epithelialized dermoglandular flap. A total of 118 patients (236 breasts) were operated on. Mean follow-up was 13 months (10-42 months). Mean patient age was 33.3 years (24-55 years). Mean operative time was 102.9 minutes (80-135 minutes), and implant size ranged from 175 to 350 mL (mode, 275 mL). There were no cases of implant extrusion, nipple-areola complex ischemia, or surgical site infection; however, 1 patient required revision surgery for implant malposition, and 2 had a postoperative hematoma. In summary, the technique we describe combines 2 established mammaplasty techniques, ensuring upper pole fullness with good cleavage, implant protection in case of wound breakdown, and good patient satisfaction as evidenced by a low revision rate and minimal complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic. Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention, such as case studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30562205     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

1.  The Inferior-Based Dermoglandular Flap with Partial Subpectoral Implant Transposition and Revision Mastopexy for Subglandular Breast Augmentation Complications.

Authors:  Mohammed Saad AboShaban; Mahmoud Ahmed Abdelaty
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  A Comparison of 28 Published Augmentation/Mastopexy Techniques Using Photographic Measurements.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-21

Review 3.  Ptosis and Bottoming out Following Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Is Synthetic Mesh Internal Breast Support the Solution? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bishara Atiyeh; Fadi Ghieh; Fadel Chahine; Ahmad Oneisi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Muscle Splitting Augmentation Mastopexy: A l3-year Analysis and Outcome of Primary and Secondary Procedures.

Authors:  Umar Daraz Khan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Mastopexy using de-epithelialised dermoglandular flaps: a case series for maximal volume conservation following breast implants removal.

Authors:  Umar Daraz Khan; Salma Naseem; Sadia Rafiq
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.981

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.