Literature DB >> 3056197

Serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease.

L A Magnarelli1.   

Abstract

Indirect fluorescent antibody tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays are being used as laboratory aids for the diagnosis of Lyme disease and related disorders. Depending on the needs, polyvalent or class-specific reagents can be used to detect total immunoglobulins (Ig) or IgM and IgG antibodies. The sensitivities of these assays are relatively low when serum samples are obtained from patients within 3 weeks after onset of erythema migrans and are tested by either the IFA method or ELISA. During neuritis or arthritis, IgG antibody levels are usually elevated, and serologic verification is more easily achieved. Cross-reactivity occurs when sera from patients with Lyme disease, relapsing fever, or treponemal infections are screened against heterologous antigens, but these diseases can usually be separated clinically or by further seroanalyses. Although IFA tests and ELISA are both suitable for confirming Lyme disease, the objective results and the ability to perform many more analyses make ELISA the preferred method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3056197     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb31848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  10 in total

1.  New laboratory guidelines for serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease: evaluation of the two-test protocol.

Authors:  T B Ledue; M F Collins; W Y Craig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Lyme arthritis.

Authors:  D H Rees; J S Axford
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Canine seroprevalence and the distribution of Ixodes dammini in an area of emerging Lyme disease.

Authors:  P W Rand; R P Smith; E H Lacombe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Amplification of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in skin biopsies from patients with Lyme disease.

Authors:  W Melchers; J Meis; P Rosa; E Claas; L Nohlmans; R Koopman; A Horrevorts; J Galama
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi and tick salivary gland proteins in New Jersey outdoor workers.

Authors:  B S Schwartz; M D Goldstein; J E Childs
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Immune capture and detection of Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in urine, blood, or tissues from infected ticks, mice, dogs, and humans.

Authors:  D W Dorward; T G Schwan; C F Garon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Ear punch biopsy method for detection and isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi from rodents.

Authors:  R J Sinsky; J Piesman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Serological studies on the infection of dogs in Ontario with Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiological agent of Lyme disease.

Authors:  H Artsob; I K Barker; R Fister; G Sephton; D Dick; J A Lynch; D Key
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.008

9.  The Ixodes ricinus tick as a vector of Borrelia burgdorferi in Slovenia.

Authors:  E Ruzić-Sablijić; F Strle; J Cimperman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Serological signature of tick-borne pathogens in Scandinavian brown bears over two decades.

Authors:  Lye Paillard; Krista L Jones; Alina L Evans; Jérémy Berret; Maxime Jacquet; Reto Lienhard; Mahmoud Bouzelboudjen; Jon M Arnemo; Jon E Swenson; Maarten J Voordouw
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.876

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.