Literature DB >> 30561789

The relationship between terminal duct lobular unit features and mammographic density among Chinese breast cancer patients.

Hyuna Sung1,2, Changyuan Guo3, Erni Li3, Jing Li3, Ruth M Pfeiffer1, Jennifer L Guida1, Renata Cora4, Nan Hu1, Joseph Deng1, Jonine D Figueroa1,5, Mark E Sherman1,6, Gretchen L Gierach1, Ning Lu3, Xiaohong R Yang1.   

Abstract

Extensive mammographic density (MD), a well-established breast cancer risk factor, is a radiological representation of stromal and epithelial breast tissue content. In studies conducted predominantly among Caucasian women, histologic measures of reduced terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution have been correlated with extensive MD, but independently associated with breast cancer risk. We therefore examined associations between TDLU measures and MD among Chinese women, a low-risk population but with high prevalence of dense breasts. Diagnostic pre-treatment digital mammograms were obtained from 144 breast cancer cases at a tertiary hospital in Beijing and scored using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. TDLU features were assessed using three standardized measures (count/100 mm2 , span [μm], and acini count/TDLU) in benign tissues. Associations between each of TDLU measures and MD were examined using generalized linear models for TDLU count and span and polytomous logistic regression for acini count with adjustment for potential confounders stratified by age. Among women ≥50 years, 63% had dense breasts; cases with dense breasts (BI-RADS, c-d) had greater TDLU count (21.1 [SE = 2.70] vs. 9.0 [SE = 1.83]; p = 0.0004), longer span (480.6 μm [SE = 24.6] vs. 393.8 μm [SE = 31.8]; p = 0.03), and greater acini count (ORtrend = 16.1; 95%CI = 4.08-63.1; ptrend < 0.0001) compared to those with non-dense breasts (BI-RADS, a-b). Among women <50 years, 91% had dense breasts, precluding our ability to detect associations. Our findings are consistent with previously reported associations between extensive MD and reduced TDLU involution, supporting the hypothesis that breast cancer risk associated with extensive MD may be related to the amount of "at-risk" epithelium.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS; China; breast cancer; mammographic density; terminal ductal lobular unit (TDLU) involution

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30561789      PMCID: PMC6488407          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  27 in total

1.  Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.

Authors:  S Ciatto; N Houssami; A Apruzzese; E Bassetti; B Brancato; F Carozzi; S Catarzi; M P Lamberini; G Marcelli; R Pellizzoni; B Pesce; G Risso; F Russo; A Scorsolini
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Ian Pagano; Galina Lurie; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Ian Pagano; Zhao Chen; Chisato Nagata; Inger Torhild Gram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Helen Guo; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Jennifer Stone; Eve Fishell; Roberta A Jong; Greg Hislop; Anna Chiarelli; Salomon Minkin; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Nadia Rajaram; Shivaani Mariapun; Mikael Eriksson; Jose Tapia; Pui Yoke Kwan; Weang Kee Ho; Faizah Harun; Kartini Rahmat; Kamila Czene; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Per Hall; Soo Hwang Teo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Terminal duct lobular unit involution of the normal breast: implications for breast cancer etiology.

Authors:  Jonine D Figueroa; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Deesha A Patel; Laura Linville; Louise A Brinton; Gretchen L Gierach; Xiaohong R Yang; Daphne Papathomas; Daniel Visscher; Carolyn Mies; Amy C Degnim; William F Anderson; Stephen Hewitt; Zeina G Khodr; Susan E Clare; Anna Maria Storniolo; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Breast cancer in China.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Jun-Jie Li; Jessica St Louis; Dianne M Finkelstein; Ke-Da Yu; Wan-Qing Chen; Zhi-Ming Shao; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates?

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Anna H Wu; W James Gauderman; Leslie Bernstein; Huiyan Ma; Malcolm C Pike; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Involution of breast tissue and mammographic density.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Dan Ju; David Horio; Lenora W M Loo; Brenda Y Hernandez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Association between mammographic breast density and histologic features of benign breast disease.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Robert A Vierkant; Ryan D Frank; Stacey Winham; Daniel W Visscher; Vernon S Pankratz; Christopher G Scott; Kathleen Brandt; Mark E Sherman; Derek C Radisky; Marlene H Frost; Lynn C Hartmann; Amy C Degnim; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  Association of Genetic Ancestry With Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution Among Healthy Women.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Hela Koka; Natascia Marino; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Renata Cora; Jonine D Figueroa; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 11.816

2.  Involution of Breast Lobules, Mammographic Breast Density and Prognosis Among Tamoxifen-Treated Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Sarah J Nyante; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Renata Cora; Donna Butcher; Lawrence Sternberg; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Shaoqi Fan; Jonine D Figueroa; Sheila Weinmann; Robert N Hoover; Louise A Brinton; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Andrew Glass; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Deep Learning Image Analysis of Benign Breast Disease to Identify Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Adithya D Vellal; Korsuk Sirinukunwattan; Kevin H Kensler; Gabrielle M Baker; Andreea L Stancu; Michael E Pyle; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; James L Connolly; Mitko Veta; A Heather Eliassen; Rulla M Tamimi; Yujing J Heng
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-01-11

4.  Automated Quantitative Measures of Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Yujing J Heng; Kevin H Kensler; Emily Z F Liu; Suzanne C Wetstein; Allison M Onken; Christina I Luffman; Gabrielle M Baker; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; Vanessa C Bret-Mounet; Mitko Veta; Josien P W Pluim; Ying Liu; Graham A Colditz; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Outdoor air pollution and terminal duct lobular involution of the normal breast.

Authors:  Nicole M Niehoff; Alexander P Keil; Rena R Jones; Shaoqi Fan; Gretchen L Gierach; Alexandra J White
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.466

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.