Literature DB >> 30561768

Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Transrectal Ultrasound in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Mingbo Zhang1, Jie Tang1, Yukun Luo1, Yiru Wang1, Meng Wu1, Benjamin Memmott2, Jing Gao2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), including grayscale imaging, color Doppler imaging, shear wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, to that of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, in the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (PCa; lesions at stage T2 or lower).
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were prospectively enrolled, including 40 in a benign prostate group and 38 in a localized PCa group (≤T2). The diagnostic performance of multiparametric TRUS and multiparametric MRI in detecting localized PCa was analyzed with surgical and biopsy pathologic results as the references.
RESULTS: Multiparametric TRUS had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy than multiparametric MRI (97.4% versus 94.7%, 96.9% versus 92.3%, and 87.2% versus 76.9%, respectively) for detecting localized PCa. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ± SD for multiparametric TRUS was 0.874 ± 0.043 (95% confidence interval, 0.790-0.959), and it was 0.774 ± 0.055 (95% confidence interval, 0.666-0.881) for multiparametric MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that multiparametric TRUS has high diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of localized PCa. Multiparametric TRUS is compatible with multiparametric MRI in the detection of localized PCa (≤T2).
© 2018 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; transrectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30561768     DOI: 10.1002/jum.14878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

1.  BIT-ART: Multicentric Comparison of HDR-brachytherapy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Tomotherapy for Advanced Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Rita Alitto; Luca Tagliaferri; Valentina Lancellotta; Andrea D'Aviero; Antonio Piras; Vincenzo Frascino; Francesco Catucci; Bruno Fionda; Christian Staackmann; Simonetta Saldi; Vincenzo Valentini; Gyorgy Kovacs; Cynthia Aristei; Giovanna Mantini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  [Sonography of the prostate : Relevance for urologists in daily clinical routine].

Authors:  Maria Apfelbeck; Dirk-André Clevert; Christian G Stief; Michael Chaloupka
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems.

Authors:  Tong Chen; Fei Wang; Hanbing Chen; Meng Wang; Peiqing Liu; Songtao Liu; Yibin Zhou; Qi Ma
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques.

Authors:  Adam Gurwin; Kamil Kowalczyk; Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin; Paweł Stelmach; Łukasz Nowak; Wojciech Krajewski; Tomasz Szydełko; Bartosz Małkiewicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Biplane transrectal ultrasonography plus ultrasonic elastosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in T staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanru Feng; Chanjuan Peng; Yuan Zhu; Luying Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.