Literature DB >> 30561719

Differences in peritoneal dialysis technique survival between patients treated with peritoneal dialysis systems from different companies.

Neil Boudville1,2, Shahid Ullah2, Phil Clayton2,3, Kamal Sud2,4,5, Monique Borlace2,3, Sunil V Badve2,6, Aron Chakera1,7, David W Johnson2,8,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of peritoneal dialysis (PD) systems are available but there have been few studies comparing them. The aim of this study was to examine technique failure and patient survival between different PD company systems.
METHODS: The study included all patients who commenced PD between 1995 and 2014 in Australia and New Zealand. Groups were compared according to the initial PD company system that they received. The primary outcome was a composite of PD technique failure and death.
RESULTS: A total of 16 575 patients commenced PD using systems manufactured by Baxter [n = 13 438 (81%)], Fresenius Medical Care [n = 2848 (17%)] or Gambro [n = 289 (2%)]. Of these, 11 870 (72%) developed technique failure, including 5421 (33%) who died. The median time to technique failure or death for all patients was 625 [interquartile range (IQR) 318-1114] days: 629.5 (IQR 321-1121) days with Baxter, 620.5 (IQR 311-1069) days with Fresenius Medical Care and 538 (IQR 272-1001) days with Gambro systems (P = 0.023). There was a statistically significant increase in technique failure or mortality rates in patients on Gambro {adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-1.62]} and Fresenius [adjusted IRR 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.19)] systems compared with Baxter systems. No difference in patient survival was observed between the three PD systems.
CONCLUSIONS: PD systems manufactured by different companies may be associated with important differences in PD technique survival. This needs to be confirmed with adequately powered, prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic renal failure; dialysis; epidemiology; peritoneal dialysis; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30561719     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  3 in total

1.  Health-Related Quality of Life Sleep Score Predicts Transfer to Hemodialysis among Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Tomoki Nagasaka; Naoki Washida; Kiyotaka Uchiyama; Eriko Yoshida Hama; Ei Kusahana; Takashin Nakayama; Itaru Yasuda; Kohkichi Morimoto; Hiroshi Itoh
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Home Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patient and Technique Survival in Canada.

Authors:  Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette; Karthik K Tennankore; Jeffrey Perl; Joanne M Bargman; David W Johnson; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-08-26

3.  Eosinophilic Reaction at the Time of Catheter Insertion Predicts Survival in Patients Initiating Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Uchiyama; Naoki Washida; Ei Kusahana; Takashin Nakayama; Kohkichi Morimoto; Hiroshi Itoh
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.348

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.