| Literature DB >> 30561438 |
Kwan Joong Joo1,2, Hongtao Li3,4,5, Xiaoliu Zhang3,4,6,7, Seth P Lerner1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite recent improvements, resistance to traditional immunotherapy or chemotherapy is still common in patients with bladder cancer. We constructed an oncolytic virus from herpes simplex virus type II (HSV-2), which selectively targets tumor cells with an activated Ras signaling pathway. We evaluated the antitumor effect of this oncolytic HSV-2 (FusOn-H2) against bladder cancer, and compared with that of a first generation oncolytic virus derived from HSV-1 (Baco-1).Entities:
Keywords: Urinary bladder neoplasms; herpes simplex virus; oncolytic virus; ras gene
Year: 2015 PMID: 30561438 PMCID: PMC6218184 DOI: 10.3233/BLC-150013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bladder Cancer
Fig.1Phenotypic characterization of oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 2 (FusOn-H2). (A) 5637 cells were infected with the indicated viruses at 0.1 pfu/cell or left uninfected as a control. (B) MBT-2 cells were infected with the indicated viruses at 10.0 pfu/cell or left uninfected as a control. Micrographs were taken 24 hour after infection. Syncytia were observed with FusOn-H2 infection but not Baco-1 or uninfected controls (original magnification×200).
Fig.2Oncolytic activity of FusOn-H2 against 5637 and MBT-2 cells in vitro. The 5637 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and infected with Baco-1 or with FusOn-H2 at a dose of either 0.01 pfu/cell (A) or 0.1 pfu/cell (B). The MBT-2 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and infected with Baco-1 or with FusOn-H2 at a dose of either 1.0 pfu/cell (C) or 10.0 pfu/cell (D). The cells were harvested at 24, 48, or 72 hours after infection, and cell viability was determined by trypan blue staining. Percent cell viability = [(number of viable cells in the infected wells)/ (number of viable cells in the uninfected wells)]×100. The bars represent mean±standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Fig.3In vivo therapeutic effect of FusOn-H2 in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. After laparotomy incision, MBT-2 cells (1×106) were injected into the bladder wall of syngeneic C3H/He female mice. Two weeks following tumor cell implantation, mice were randomly divided into three groups, and were instilled with 1×107 pfu of either FusOn-H2 or Baco-1 or a similar volume of PBS (as a control) into the bladder via a transurethral catheter. A repeated intravesical instillation with same dose of virus was performed one week later. Three weeks after the first treatment, all mice were euthanized and examined for orthotopic tumors. (A, B) The photographs demonstrate the gross appearance of tumors with the arrows indicating tumors. (C) Comparison of tumor volume after oncolytic viral therapy. The bars represent mean±standard deviation. *Baco-1 versus PBS control (p < 0.05) and # FusOn-H2 versus PBS control (p < 0.01). (D) Comparison of tumor weight after oncolytic viral therapy. The bars represent mean±standard deviation. *Baco-1 versus PBS control (p < 0.05) and # FusOn-H2 versus PBS control(p < 0.05).
Fig.4Tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity after oncolytic viral therapy. (A) The cytotoxic activity of effector cells prepared from spleens was measured against MBT-2 cells. (B) Effector cells from the same preparation used in (A) were evaluated with the ELISPOT assay to determine the frequency of tumor-specific CTLs. The bars represent mean±standard deviation. *FusOn-H2 versus Baco-1 (p < 0.05) and # FusOn-H2 versus PBS (p < 0.05). E/T ratio, effector to target cell ratio; SFC, spot forming cells.