Literature DB >> 30561383

Predicting tumour response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with computational modelling.

Damijan Valentinuzzi1, Urban Simončič, Katja Uršič, Martina Vrankar, Maruša Turk, Robert Jeraj.   

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly developing field, with numerous drugs and therapy combinations waiting to be tested in pre-clinical and clinical settings. However, the costly and time-consuming trial-and-error approach to development of new treatment paradigms creates a research bottleneck, motivating the development of complementary approaches. Computational modelling is a compelling candidate for this task, however, difficulties associated with the validation of such models limit their use in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Here we propose a bottom-up deterministic computational model to simulate tumour response to treatment with anti-programmed-death-1 antibodies (anti-PD-1). The model was built with validation in mind, and so contains minimum number of parameters, and only four free parameters. Moreover, all model parameters can be measured experimentally. Free parameters were tuned by fitting the model to experimental data from the literature, using B16-F10 murine melanoma implanted into wild type (C57BL/6), as well as into immunodeficient (NSG) mice strains, and treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies. The model's predictive ability was verified on two independent datasets from literature with different but well-known inputs. To identify possible biomarkers of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, sensitivity study of key model parameters was performed. Good agreement between the simulated tumour growth curves and the experimental data was achieved, with mean relative deviations in the range of 13%-20%. Our sensitivity study demonstrated that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression was the only parameter able to clearly discriminate responders from non-responders to anti-PD-1 therapy. Additionally, the results of sensitivity studies suggest that MHC class I expression might affect the predictive ability of other biomarkers that are currently used in the clinics, such as PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression. Interestingly, our model predicts the best response to anti-PD-1 therapy for subjects with moderate PD-L1 values. Such computational models show promise to support, guide and accelerate future immunotherapy research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30561383     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf96c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  Predictive biomarkers and mechanisms underlying resistance to PD1/PD-L1 blockade cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Daixi Ren; Yuze Hua; Boyao Yu; Xin Ye; Ziheng He; Chunwei Li; Jie Wang; Yongzhen Mo; Xiaoxu Wei; Yunhua Chen; Yujuan Zhou; Qianjin Liao; Hui Wang; Bo Xiang; Ming Zhou; Xiaoling Li; Guiyuan Li; Yong Li; Zhaoyang Zeng; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 27.401

2.  Tumor-infiltrating mast cells are associated with resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy.

Authors:  Rajasekharan Somasundaram; Thomas Connelly; Robin Choi; Hyeree Choi; Anastasia Samarkina; Ling Li; Elizabeth Gregorio; Yeqing Chen; Rohit Thakur; Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen; Marilda Beqiri; Meaghan Kiernan; Michela Perego; Fang Wang; Min Xiao; Patricia Brafford; Xue Yang; Xiaowei Xu; Anthony Secreto; Gwenn Danet-Desnoyers; Daniel Traum; Klaus H Kaestner; Alexander C Huang; Denitsa Hristova; Joshua Wang; Mizuho Fukunaga-Kalabis; Clemens Krepler; Fang Ping-Chen; Xiangyang Zhou; Alexis Gutierrez; Vito W Rebecca; Prashanthi Vonteddu; Farokh Dotiwala; Shashi Bala; Sonali Majumdar; Harsh Dweep; Jayamanna Wickramasinghe; Andrew V Kossenkov; Jorge Reyes-Arbujas; Kenisha Santiago; Tran Nguyen; Johannes Griss; Frederick Keeney; James Hayden; Brian J Gavin; David Weiner; Luis J Montaner; Qin Liu; Lukas Peiffer; Jürgen Becker; Elizabeth M Burton; Michael A Davies; Michael T Tetzlaff; Kar Muthumani; Jennifer A Wargo; Dmitry Gabrilovich; Meenhard Herlyn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Seed- and Soil-Dependent Differences in Murine Breast Tumor Microenvironments Dictate Anti-PD-L1 IgG Delivery and Therapeutic Efficacy.

Authors:  Yan Ting Liu; Shreya Goel; Megumi Kai; Jose Alberto Moran Guerrero; Thao Nguyen; Junhua Mai; Haifa Shen; Arturas Ziemys; Kenji Yokoi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  EGCG Inhibits Tumor Growth in Melanoma by Targeting JAK-STAT Signaling and Its Downstream PD-L1/PD-L2-PD1 Axis in Tumors and Enhancing Cytotoxic T-Cell Responses.

Authors:  Dinoop Ravindran Menon; Yang Li; Takeshi Yamauchi; Douglas Grant Osborne; Prasanna Kumar Vaddi; Michael F Wempe; Zili Zhai; Mayumi Fujita
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-26

5.  Research Trends and Most Influential Clinical Studies on Anti-PD1/PDL1 Immunotherapy for Cancers: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Yanhao Liu; Yan Xu; Xi Cheng; Yaru Lin; Shu Jiang; Haiming Yu; Zhen Zhang; Linlin Lu; Xiaotao Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  A tipping point in cancer-immune dynamics leads to divergent immunotherapy responses and hampers biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Jeroen H A Creemers; W Joost Lesterhuis; Niven Mehra; Winald R Gerritsen; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries; Johannes Textor
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 13.751

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.