Dennis Murphy1, Serap Gorucu1, Bryan Weichelt2, Erika Scott3, Mark Purschwitz4. 1. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. 2. Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield, Wisconsin. 3. Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety in Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing (NEC), Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, New York. 4. Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Agricultural safety and health researchers have used a variety of classification and coding schemes to identify and categorize injury, illness, and disease associated with agricultural hazards. This paper demonstrates how the Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification (FAIC) and Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) coding schemes can be used in tandem for all agricultural injuries. METHODS: Specific cases from the AgInjuryNews.org database were selected to illustrate how the FAIC and OIICS codes can be applied to agricultural injury, and to illustrate limitations that still exist with each coding scheme. RESULTS: Using the FAIC and OIICS together provided a clearer picture of an injury incident by combining more explicit occupational and non-occupational exposures with incident type details in a single table. CONCLUSIONS: Both FAIC and OIICS coding schemes depend on sufficient information being available from injury reports. This paper concluded with suggestions for improving coding of agricultural injury.
BACKGROUND: Agricultural safety and health researchers have used a variety of classification and coding schemes to identify and categorize injury, illness, and disease associated with agricultural hazards. This paper demonstrates how the Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification (FAIC) and Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) coding schemes can be used in tandem for all agricultural injuries. METHODS: Specific cases from the AgInjuryNews.org database were selected to illustrate how the FAIC and OIICS codes can be applied to agricultural injury, and to illustrate limitations that still exist with each coding scheme. RESULTS: Using the FAIC and OIICS together provided a clearer picture of an injury incident by combining more explicit occupational and non-occupational exposures with incident type details in a single table. CONCLUSIONS: Both FAIC and OIICS coding schemes depend on sufficient information being available from injury reports. This paper concluded with suggestions for improving coding of agricultural injury.