| Literature DB >> 30560698 |
Murat Tas1, Esra Senturk2, Deniz Ekinci3, Ramazan Demirdag2, Veysal Comakli2, Metin Bayram4, Murat Akyuz1, Murat Senturk5, Claudiu T Supuran6.
Abstract
The effects of high-intensity interval and continuous exercise on erythrocytes carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) activity levels were scarcely investigated up until now. Here we present a study focused on the CA activity from erythrocytes of athletes experiencing interval and continuous training for 6 weeks, during cold weather and at high altitude (> 1600 m). We observed a 50% increase in the blood CA activity at the second week after initiation of the training in both interval and continuos running groups, whereas the control group did not experience any variation in the enzyme activity levels. In the trained individuals a mild decrease in their body mass, BMI and an increased [Formula: see text] were also observed. The CA activity returned at the basal values after 4-6 weeks after the training started, probably proving that a metabolic compensation occurred without the need of an enhanced enzyme activity. The unexpected 50% rise of activity for an enzyme which acts as a very efficient catalyst for CO2 hydration/bicarbonate dehydration, such as the blood CA, deserves further investigations for better understanding the physiologic basis of this phenomenon.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrase; enzyme inhibition; exercise training
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30560698 PMCID: PMC6292344 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1545768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.pH balance of the skeletal muscle and the involvement of blood CAs in the process.
Figure 2.Interval training graph. 1: control, 2: 1st week before training, 3: 1st week after training, 4: 2nd week after training, 5: 4th week after training, 6: 6th week after training.
Erytrocytes carbonic anhydrase spesific activity results for control, interval and continuous tarining.
| Training species | Specific activity results (EU/mg protein) | % Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.0120 ± 0.0003 | 100 | |
| Interval training | 1st week before training | 0.0127 ± 0.0005 | 106 |
| 1st week after training | 0.0139 ± 0.0007 | 116 | |
| 2nd week after training | 0.0180 ± 0.0010 | 150 | |
| 4th week after training | 0.0128 ± 0.0004 | 107 | |
| 6th week after training | 0.0120 ± 0.0003 | 100 | |
| Continuous training | 1st week before training | 0.0122 ± 0.0003 | 102 |
| 1st week after training | 0.0130 ± 0.0005 | 108 | |
| 2nd week after training | 0.0177 ± 0.0010 | 148 | |
| 4th week after training | 0.0135 ± 0.0006 | 113 | |
| 6th week after training | 0.0117 ± 0.0002 | 98 | |
Interval running group (IRG), continuous running group (CRG) and control group (CG).
| IRG ( | CRG ( | CG ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X ± SS | X ± SS | X ± SS | ||
| Age (years) | 21.6 ± 1.07 | 23.1 ± 2.07 | 24.8 ± 1.47 | |
| Length (cm) | 1.77 ± 0.08 | 1.75 ± 0.07 | 1.76 ± 0.05 | |
| Body mass (kg) | Before test | 69.7 ± 9.2 | 66.5 ± 6.0 | 76.8 ± 10.0 |
| After test | 68.3 ± 9.6 | 64.6 ± 5.6 | 77.6 ± 9.5 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | Before test | 21.9 ± 1.6 | 21.6 ± 1.6 | 21.9 ± 1.6 |
| After test | 21.4 ± 1.7 | 20.9 ± 1.6 | 21.4 ± 1.7 | |
| max | Before test | 42.6 ± 5.3 | 41.3 ± 3.0 | 36.7 ± 2.2 |
| After test | 47.6 ± 4.1 | 50.2 ± 3.5 | 36.7 ± 1.3 |
*p < .05.
**p < .01.