Literature DB >> 30560512

It's Lonely at the Top: Adolescent Students' Peer-perceived Popularity and Self-perceived Social Contentment.

Sharlyn M Ferguson1, Allison M Ryan2.   

Abstract

Popularity is highly desired among youth, often more so than academic achievement or friendship. Recent evidence suggests being known as "popular" among peers (perceived popularity) may be more detrimental during adolescence than being widely well-liked (sociometric popularity). Thus, this study sought to better understand how two dimensions of popularity (perceived and sociometric) may contribute to adolescents' own perceptions of satisfaction and happiness regarding their social life at school, and hypothesized that "being popular" would have a more complex (and curvilinear) association with adolescents' social contentment than previously considered by linear models. Adolescents' peer popularity and self-perceived social contentment were examined as both linear and curvilinear associations along each status continuum in a series of hierarchical regressions. Participants were 767 7th-grade students from two middle schools in the Midwest (52% female, 46% White, 45% African American). Perceived and sociometric popularity were assessed via peer nominations ("most popular" and "liked the most", respectively). Self-reported social satisfaction, best friendship quality, social self-concept, and school belonging were assessed as aspects of social contentment. The results indicated that both high and low levels of perceived popularity, as well as high and low levels of sociometric popularity, predicted lower perceptions of social satisfaction, poorer best friendship quality, and lower social self-concept than youth with moderate levels of either status. Implications to promote adolescents' psychosocial well-being by targeting popularity's disproportionate desirability among youth are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Curvilinear; Loneliness; Popularity; Social contentment; Social satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30560512     DOI: 10.1007/s10964-018-0970-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Youth Adolesc        ISSN: 0047-2891


  8 in total

1.  Predicting How Well Adolescents Get Along with Peers and Teachers: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Farhan Ali; Rebecca P Ang
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Peer Status as a Potential Risk or Protective Factor: A Latent Profile Analysis on Peer Status and Its Association with Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescents with and without Parental Physical Abuse Experience.

Authors:  Céline A Favre; Dilan Aksoy; Clarissa Janousch; Ariana Garrote
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Examining Social Status Profiles with Gender, School Attended, SES, Academic Achievement and Wellbeing in Urban China.

Authors:  Wanying Zhou; Ros McLellan
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2021-05-29

4.  Adolescent Popularity: Distinct Profiles and Associations with Excessive Internet Usage and Interpersonal Sensitivity.

Authors:  Vasileios Stavropoulos; Emily Barber; Gabriel de Sena Collier; Jeffrey G Snodgrass; Rapson Gomez
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 5.  Bullying Prevention in Adolescence: Solutions and New Challenges from the Past Decade.

Authors:  Christina Salmivalli; Lydia Laninga-Wijnen; Sarah T Malamut; Claire F Garandeau
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2021-12

6.  Sociometric Popularity, Perceived Peer Support, and Self-Concept in Adolescence.

Authors:  Arantza Fernández-Zabala; Estibaliz Ramos-Díaz; Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández; Juan L Núñez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-26

7.  Adolescent Victim Types Across the Popularity Status Hierarchy: Differences in Internalizing Symptoms.

Authors:  Sarah T Malamut; Molly Dawes; Yvonne van den Berg; Tessa A M Lansu; David Schwartz; Antonius H N Cillessen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2021-09-28

8.  Majority and popularity effects on norm formation in adolescence.

Authors:  Ana da Silva Pinho; Lucas Molleman; Barbara R Braams; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.