| Literature DB >> 30559845 |
Dmitrii A Popkov1, Tamara A Silanteva1, Elena N Gorbach1, Eduard R Mingazov1, Natalia A Kononovich1, Arnold V Popkov1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of intramedullary elastic nailing is a method of choice for prevention of complications in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. However, the morphology of the growing long bones in the conditions created was not investigated. AIM: The purpose of our experiment was to study the impact of elastic intramedullary nailing on the histostructure of long bones in their physiological growth.Entities:
Keywords: Elastic intramedullary nail; Growing animals; Histology; Tibia; Transphyseal nailing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30559845 PMCID: PMC6290436 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
Figure 1Histostructural organisation of the proximal epiphysis of the contralateral (a) and operated (d) canine tibiae of the dog after 6 months of transphyseal elastic intramedullary nailing. Changes in histoarchitectonics in the articular surface (e) and spongy bone substance (f) of the operated bone were noted in comparison with the corresponding sites (b, c) of the contralateral limb. Celloidine sections. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin (a, d), magnification × 6.5. Masson staining (b, c, e, f), magnification × 100
Figure 2Histostructural organisation of the distal epiphysis of the control (a) and experimental (d) tibia of the dog after 6 months of transphyseal elastic intramedullary nailing. Changes in the histoarchitectonics of the articular surface (e) and spongy bone substance (f) of the operated bone were noted in comparison with the corresponding contralateral sites (b, c). Celloidin sections. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin, magnification × 6.5 (a, d); magnification × 100 (b, c, e, f)
Semiquantitative histological evaluation of the articular surface of the tibial epiphyses of the control (C) and experimental (E) segments according to the ICRS scale [12]
| Parameter and its histological evaluation (score) | Articular surface | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal epiphysis | Distal epiphysis | |||
| C | E | C | E | |
| I. Surface | 3 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.3 |
| Smooth/continuous (3) | ||||
| Discontinuities/irregularities (0) | ||||
| II. Matrix | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Hyaline (3) | ||||
| Mixture: hyaline.fibrocartilage (2) | ||||
| Fibrocartilage (1) | ||||
| Fibrous tissue (0) | ||||
| III. Cell distribution | 3 | 2.3 | 3 | 1.3 |
| Columnar (3) | ||||
| Mixed.columnar-clusters (2) | ||||
| Clusters (1) | ||||
| Individual cells.disorganized (0) | ||||
| IV. Cell population viability | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Predominantly viable (3) | ||||
| Partially viable (1) | ||||
| <10% viable (0) | ||||
| V. Subchondral bone | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2.3 |
| Normal (3) | ||||
| Increased remodeling (2) | ||||
| Bone necrosis.granulation tissue (1) | ||||
| Detached.fracture.callus at base(0) | ||||
| VI. Cartilage mineralization (calcified cartilage) | 3 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.3 |
| Normal (3) | ||||
| Abnormal.inappropriate location(0) | ||||
Histomorphometric evaluation of the parameters of the hyaline articular cartilage of the tibia of the control (C) and experimental (E) segments (M ± SD, μm)
| Parameter | Proximal epiphysis | Distal epiphysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | E | C | E | |
| htot | 311±32.8 | 227±14.2[ | 223±39.1 | 216.8±42.1 |
| hncalc | 275±44.7 | 209±12.8[ | 198±32.6 | 185.9±31.9[ |
| hcalc | 87±40.6 | 19.3±9.6[ | 43.5±11.2 | 32.2±11.0[ |
| NAXLI | 2586±833.9 | 4439±709.2[ | 2739±422.8 | 3258±318.9[ |
–statistical difference with control side, p < 0.05.
Histomorphometric evaluation of the height of the medial (M) and lateral (L) part of the tibial epiphyses, (M ± SD, μm)
| Control segment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Proximal epiphysis | Distal epiphysis | ||
| M | L | M | L | |
| hep | 476 ± 8.1 | 473 ± 11.3 | 262 ± 8.92[ | 274 ± 10.7 |
| Experimental segment | ||||
| Parameter | Proximal epiphysis | Distal epiphysis | ||
| M | L | M | L | |
| hep | 477 ± 14.0 | 460 ± 14.9[ | 190 ± 10.7[ | 271 ± 11.9 |
–differences with the opposite part of the epiphysis are significant at p < 0.05;
–differences with the same parameter of the control segment are significant at p < 0.05.
Morphometric parameters of the tibial diaphysis of the control (C) and experimental (E) segments after 180 days (M ± SD)
| Thickness of compact plate. Hcp (μm) | The trabecular bone area in the bone marrow canal. Stb (μm2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C | E | C | E |
| 2341 ± 8.42 | 2515 ± 9.11[ | 1669755 ± 8202 | 473512 ± 30.11[ |
– the Significant difference with control segment, p < 0.05.