Literature DB >> 30559821

Influence of elderly patients' coronary artery lesion severity on cardiac remodeling and left ventricular function.

Chao Wang1, Xiang Tian2, Huixin Cai3, Liang Feng4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the correlation between coronary artery lesion and cardiac function change among elderly patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).
METHODS: A total of 171 elderly patients with CHD hospitalized from 2009 to 2016 were selected. Their ultrasonic cardiographic and coronary angiographic data were collected, and the correlation between coronary artery lesion and left ventricular remodeling, systolic and diastolic function was analyzed.
RESULTS: Coronary artery lesion among elderly patients with CHD was closely related with left ventricular remodeling and systolic function change, but not significantly correlated with diastolic function change.
CONCLUSION: Coronary artery lesion severity of elderly patients with CHD was an important reason for left ventricular remodeling and cardiac systolic function change. Early intervention of coronary artery disease is of great significance to protect the heart function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac remodeling; Coronary heart disease; Diastolic function; Elderly; Systolic function

Year:  2018        PMID: 30559821      PMCID: PMC6290191          DOI: 10.12669/pjms.346.15906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


INTRODUCTION

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a serious threat to human health. With the development of drug therapy and coronary revascularization, patients have expanded lifetime, but cardiac insufficiency-induced morbidity keeps increasing.1,2 Cardiac function change is the main factor influencing CHD patients’ prognosis. Through analyzing the correlation between coronary artery lesion and cardiac function change among elderly patients with CHD, we herein aimed to provide a clinical basis for reasonably proposing treatment regimens and determining the prognosis.

METHODS

This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital, and written consent has been obtained from all patients. A total of 171 elderly patients with CHD hospitalized in Baoding First Central Hospital from 2009 to 2016 were selected, including 122 males and 49 females aged 60-85 years old, of whom 72 had the history of myocardial infarction (MI). All patients had echocardiography and coronary angiography (CAG). Other factors causing LVEF decline, such as valvular heart disease and congenital heart disease, were excluded. Based on ultrasonic Doppler testing, the LVEF values of 62 patients were <50%, indicating decline of left ventricular systolic function.

Design of questionnaires

Through retrospective investigation, questionnaires were designed to record relevant data of the selected cases.

Echocardiography examination

The echocardiographic data of patients, including LVEF, LVEDD, LVESD, FS, AOD and LAD, were recorded within one week of hospitalization. LVEDD was used as the main index to evaluate left ventricular remodeling, and LVEF<50% was utilized as the index for decline of left ventricular systolic function. E peak and A peak were detected by a combination of B-type ultrasound, color Doppler and pulse Doppler, and then E/A ratio was calculated as the index for evaluating left ventricular diastolic function.

CAG examination

CAG was performed by using PHILIPS FD20 digital subtraction angiography. The arteria femoralis or radial artery access was established with the Seldinger technology. The Judkins method was employed for selective CAG, together with multi-position projection. The severity of stenoses was calculated by using QCA, and the degree and range of coronary artery lesions were evaluated based on Gensini scores.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by SPSS software package, and the quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (± S). The means of two groups were compared by the t test. The numerical data were expressed as percentage and subjected to the χ2 test. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between numerical data. P<0.05 was considered significantly different.

RESULTS

Correlation between Gensini score as well as left ventricular structure and function

For elderly patients with CHD, the correlation between Gensini score and LVEDD, LVESD, FS, AOD, LAD, and LVEF had statistical significance (P<0.05). The correlation between Gensini score and E/A ratio was not significant (P>0.05) (Table-I). After excluding MI, the correlation between Gensini score and LVEDD, AOD, LAD, and LVEF had statistical significance (P<0.05). Nevertheless, Gensini score was not significantly correlated with LVESD, FS or E/A ratio (P>0.05) (Table-II).
Table-I

Correlation between Gensini score as well as left ventricular structure and function.

ItemCorrelation coefficient with Gensini score (r)P
LVEDD0.3300.000
LVESD0.1710.032
FS-0.3580.000
AOD0.2890.000
LAD0.2900.000
LVEF-0.4270.000
E/A ratio-0.0300.738
Table-II

Correlation between Gensini score as well as left ventricular structure and function after excluding MI.

ItemCorrelation coefficient with Gensini score (r)P
LVEDD0.3510.002
LVESD0.0580.640
FS-0.1820.156
AOD0.3290.005
LAD0.3020.010
LVEF-0.2640.021
E/A ratio0.1790.224
Correlation between Gensini score as well as left ventricular structure and function. Correlation between Gensini score as well as left ventricular structure and function after excluding MI.

Comparisons between groups with and without MI history

The groups with and without MI history had significantly different LVEDD, LVESD, FS, AOD, LAD and LVEF (P<0.05). However, their E/A ratios were similar (P>0.05) (Table-III).
Table-III

Left ventricular structures and functions of groups with and without MI history

Echo featuresGroup with MI historyGroup without MI historyFP

n (X̄±S)n (X̄±S)
LVEDD75 (10.734±16.468)93 (5.377±5.892)8.5010.004
LVESD68 (4.814±5.436)90 (2.824±0.740)11.8030.001
FS62 (26.85±8.895)90 (37.91±8.426)60.3910.000
E/A ratio48 (0.801±0.334)81 (0.804±0.290)0.0030.960
LVEF76 (46.39±12.976)94 (66.10±11.960)105.7300.000
AOD72 (5.97±9.025)89 (3.65±4.963)4.3050.040
LAD72 (7.513±11.169)89 (4.276±5.638)5.6880.018
Left ventricular structures and functions of groups with and without MI history

Comparisons between groups with and without LVEF decline

The groups with and without LVEF decline had significantly different LVEDD, LVESD, FS, AOD and LAD (P<0.05) (Table-IV). Involvement of interior descending branch, involvement of right coronary artery, multi-branch lesions and entirely occlusive coronary artery differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar involvement of left main coronary artery and involvement of circumflex artery (P>0.05) (Table-V).
Table-IV

Left ventricular structures and functions of groups with and without LVEF decline

Echo featuresLVEF <50%LVEF >50%FP

n (X̄±S)n (X̄±S)
LVEDD60 (11.484±17.131)108 (5.705±7.395)9.2990.003
LVESD53 (5.356±6.050)105 (2.835±0.727)17.8440.000
FS49 (23.10±6.521)103 (38.30±7.618)144.5490.000
E/A ratio36 (0.800±0.354)93 (0.803±0.287)0.0030.956
AOD60 (6.65±9.661)101 (3.52±4.787)7.4840.007
LAD60 (8.553±12.332)101 (4.043±4.829)10.7710.001
Table-V

Coronary artery lesions of groups with and without LVEF decline.

CAG resultLVEF <50%LVEF ≥50%χ2P

Case No. (percentage)Case No. (percentage)
Involvement of left vertical branch8 (13.56%)10 (9.17%)0.7690.380
Involvement of interior descending branch59 (96.72%)88 (80.73%)8.5450.003
Involvement of circumflex artery46 (75.41%)68 (64.15%)2.2650.132
Involvement of right coronary artery52 (85.25%)69 (63.89%)8.7440.003
Multi-branch lesion56 (91.80%)75 (69.44%)11.1810.001
Diffuse lesion40 (65.57%)40 (36.70%)13.0910.000
Entirely occlusive coronary artery34 (55.74%)36 (33.03%)8.3280.004
Left ventricular structures and functions of groups with and without LVEF decline Coronary artery lesions of groups with and without LVEF decline.

DISCUSSION

Coronary artery lesion may influence cardiac function through severe acute ischemia or long-term chronic ischemia. In order to reduce the outcome of late cardiac dysfunction, doctors have been exploring factors such as negative ventricular remodeling, left ventricular contraction, and diastolic dysfunction. Among these factors, the severity of coronary artery disease is related to ventricular remodeling and left ventricular function.3,4 In elderly patients with CHD, the left atrium causes constant progression of left ventricle and aorta remodeling and progressive decline of left ventricular systolic function. Cardiac remodeling is the basic mechanism of cardiac failure development, manifested as cardiac chamber expansion and geometrical shape change on echocardiography. Packer et al. reported that the morphological change of ventricular remodeling was earlier than functional change of abnormal hemodynamics.5,6 Left ventricle remodeling can aggravate the left ventricular systolic dysfunction. CHD patients’ ventricular systolic function in resting condition is of great significance to long-term prognosis. Besides, LVEF decline means increase of death rate.7,8 LVEF decline in older patients with coronary artery disease is more serious, the vessel lesion and complex lesions were higher than normal heart function group.9 In addition, the elderly patients with CHD whose LVEF declined had more serious coronary artery lesion, with more vascular and complex lesions than those of the group with normal cardiac function. The anterior descending branch and right coronary artery lesion was more likely to cause the decline of cardiac systolic function. The similar left main coronary artery lesions of the two groups may be attributed to the small case number. The circumflex artery contributed to 22.3% of ventricular and myocardial ischemia, which was lower than those of anterior descending branch (41.5%) and right coronary artery (36.2%). The ramus communicans connected three blood vessels, which may be responsible for the similar circumflex artery lesions between the two groups. MI may cause irreversible decrease and pathological hypertrophy of myocardial cells in non-ischemic region, then inducing left ventricular remodeling. In this study, the cardiac chamber expansion and systolic function decline of groups with and without MI history were significantly different. For patients with the same diffuse coronary artery disease, many studies have also confirmed that besides myocardial infarction as a risk factor for left ventricular dysfunction, some traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease, such as family history of coronary heart disease, age, smoking, PCI history, stroke history, history of peripheral vascular disease, chronic complete closure, were also confirmed not associated with left ventricular dysfunction, which may be related to the establishment of collateral circulation, ischemic preconditioning, and ischemic postconditioning.10-13 For the elderly patients with CHD excluding MI history, there was no partial loss of myocardial cell mass caused by abrupt closure of the coronary artery. The coronary artery lesion degree indicated by Gensini score was significantly correlated with left ventricular remodeling or ventricular systolic function change. Probably, chronic myocardial ischemia caused by arterial constriction was responsible for the cardiac function change, being related with the coronary artery lesion severity. Studies found that for patients with angina pectoris and coronary heart disease, myocardial ischemia degree and cardiac function condition predominantly determined the prognosis.14,15 Relevant vascular revascularization may be conducive to improving the prognosis.16 Large proportions of elderly patients with congestive heart failure but normal ejection fraction mainly suffer from diastolic dysfunction.17,18 E/A ratio is the mostly used parameter for evaluating diastolic function. Long-term coronary disease, obesity and hypertension can cause myocardial cell ischemia, anoxia, repetitive reperfusion injury and myocardial matrix change, thereby influencing passive accommodation performance and undermining diastolic function.19 For patients with early coronary disease, diastolic dysfunction was a more sensitive index than systolic function change.20,21 We herein found that the coronary artery lesion of elderly patients with CHD did not affect their diastolic function. As systolic function evidently declined, E/A ratios of the two groups remained similar. Furthermore, E/A ratio and LVEF were not significantly correlated, suggesting that the occurrence of diastolic incompetence was unparalleled with systolic function decline. Hence, the causes for diastolic function change among elderly patients with CHD still need in-depth studies. In conclusion, the coronary artery lesion severity of elderly patients with CHD was an important reason for left ventricular remodeling and cardiac systolic function change. Cardiac diastolic function change was not significantly correlated with coronary artery lesion. It is important in clinical work to improve the blood flow of myocardial tissue and prevent ventricular remodeling to prevent heart failure. At the same time, the early intervention of coronary artery disease is also of great significance to protect the heart function.

Authors’ contributions

CW designed this study and revised the manuscript. XT, HC & LF performed this study and prepared the manuscript.
  21 in total

1.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by radionuclide ventriculography in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jan Naar; Filip Málek; Otto Lang; Otakar Bělohlávek; Jana Vránová; Tomáš Mráz; Eva Mandysová; Petr Neužil
Journal:  Vnitr Lek       Date:  2014-02

2.  Patient participation during and after a self-management programme in primary healthcare - The experience of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Kristina Luhr; Marie Holmefur; Kersti Theander; Ann Catrine Eldh
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-12-26

Review 3.  Assessment of ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  O A Smiseth
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease.

Authors:  P J Harris; F E Harrell; K L Lee; V S Behar; R A Rosati
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The impact of chronic kidney disease on medication choice and pharmacologic management in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Syed Raza Shah; David E Winchester
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.045

6.  The prognostic value of heart rate recovery in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sangeeta Lachman; Michel S Terbraak; Jacqueline Limpens; Harald Jorstad; Cees Lucas; Wilma Scholte Op Reimer; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Gerben Ter Riet; Ron J G Peters
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Disease management programs in chronic heart failure : Position statement of the Heart Failure Working Group and the Working Group of the Cardiological Assistance and Care Personnel of the Austrian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Deddo Moertl; Johann Altenberger; Norbert Bauer; Robert Berent; Rudolf Berger; Armin Boehmer; Christian Ebner; Margarethe Fritsch; Friedrich Geyrhofer; Martin Huelsmann; Gerhard Poelzl; Thomas Stefenelli
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 8.  Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: state of the art after 35 years with Doppler assessment.

Authors:  Otto A Smiseth
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-12-13

9.  Left ventricular torsional dynamics post exercise for LV diastolic function assessment.

Authors:  Muhammad Asrar ul Haq; Vivek Mutha; Tina Lin; Konstantinos Profitis; Zoe Tuer; Kwang Lim; David L Hare; Chiew Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Serum magnesium levels and risk of coronary artery disease: Mendelian randomisation study.

Authors:  Susanna C Larsson; Stephen Burgess; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.