| Literature DB >> 30559667 |
Tsubasa Kameyama1,2, Kazuki Ohuchi1,2, Michinori Funato2, Shiori Ando1,2, Satoshi Inagaki1,2, Arisu Sato1,2, Junko Seki2, Chizuru Kawase2, Kazuhiro Tsuruma1, Ichizo Nishino3, Shinsuke Nakamura1, Masamitsu Shimazawa1, Takashi Saito3, Shin'ichi Takeda3, Hideo Kaneko2, Hideaki Hara1.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a recessive X-linked form of muscular dystrophy characterized by progressive muscle degeneration. This disease is caused by the mutation or deletion of the dystrophin gene. Currently, there are no effective treatments and glucocorticoid administration is a standard care for DMD. However, the mechanism underlying prednisolone effects, which leads to increased walking, as well as decreased muscle wastage, is poorly understood. Our purpose in this study is to investigate the mechanisms of the efficacy of prednisolone for this disease. We converted fibroblasts of normal human cell line and a DMD patient sample to myotubes by MyoD transduction using a retroviral vector. In myotubes from the MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of the DMD patient, the myotube area was decreased and its apoptosis was increased. Furthermore, we confirmed that prednisolone could rescue these pathologies. Prednisolone increased the expression of not utrophin but laminin by down-regulation of MMP-2 mRNA. These results suggest that the up-regulation of laminin may be one of the mechanisms of the efficacy of prednisolone for DMD.Entities:
Keywords: MMP-2; duchenne muscular dystrophy; laminin; prednisolone; utrophin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30559667 PMCID: PMC6287205 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Genetic diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients (DMD01 and 02) used in this study. (A–C) The Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis of the DMD patients (DMD01 and 02) in this study. The exons 42 and 43 deletion were found in DMD01, but no deletion and duplication in DMD02. DMD02 showed c.4545_4549delGAAGT, p.Lys1516∗ in exon 33.
FIGURE 2Conversion of fibroblasts to myotubes by MyoD transduction. (A) Schematic of myotubes differentiation from MyoD-transduced fibroblasts. (B) Immunostaining of skeletal muscle marker (myosin heavy chain, MHC) 11 to 21 days after myogenic differentiation. (C) Immunostaining of dystrophin 11 to 21 days after myogenic differentiation. The myotubes from MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of DMD patient resulted in the decrease of dystrophin protein. Scale bar = 50 μm. (D,E) ROS assay using CellROX® deep red reagent to investigate whether ROS production was promoted or not. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5). ##p < 0.01 vs. Control (Student’s t-test). Scale bar = 100 μm (left image), 50 μm (Right magnified image).
FIGURE 3Comparison between myotues from MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of a normal human cell line and a DMD patient. (A) Comparison of myotubes from MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of a control individual and patient with DMD 11, 16, and 21 days after myogenic differentiation using skeletal muscle marker (myosin heavy chain, MHC). (B) Quantification of myotube area in MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of a control individual and a patient with DMD 11, 16, and 21 days after myogenic differentiation by analyzing MHC positive cells. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3 or 5). ##p < 0.01 and #p < 0.05 vs. Control (Student’s t-test). (C,D) Western blot analysis of MHC in a Ctrl individual and a DMD patient derived myotubes at 11 and 16 days. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05 vs. Control (Student’s t-test). (E,F) Number of nuclei per MHC+ myotubes in Ctrl individual and a DMD patient at 21 days. Arrowheads indicate the nuclei. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5). Scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Fusion index analysis in Ctrl individual and a DMD patient (DMD01). Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). ##p < 0.01 vs. Control (Student’s t-test). (H) Comparison of death of myotubes from MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of a control individual and a patient with DMD 16 and 21 days after myogenic differentiation using apoptosis marker (cleaved caspase-3). Arrowheads indicate cleaved caspase-3 positive cells. Scale bar = 100 μm. (I) Western blot analysis of cleaved caspase-3 in myotubes from MyoD-transduced fibroblasts of a control individual and a DMD patient. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). ##p < 0.01 vs. Control and #p < 0.05 vs. Control (Student’s t-test).
FIGURE 4Efficacy of prednisolone in reversing DMD pathology. (A) Immunostaining using skeletal muscle marker (myosin heavy chain, MHC), and apoptosis marker (cleaved caspase-3, Cas). Prednisolone (PDN) restored decreased MHC area and increased apoptosis cells. Scale bars = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of the MHC area of myotubes from control individual, non-treated myotubes from DMD (NT), and prednisolone-treated myotubes from DMD (PDN). Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 4). (C) Western blot analysis of cleaved caspase-3 in control individual (Ctrl), NT, and PDN. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5). #p < 0.05 vs. Ctrl and ∗p < 0.05 vs. NT (Student’s t-test), ∗p < 0.05 vs. NT (Student’s t-test).
FIGURE 5Mechanisms of the efficacy of prednisolone in DMD pathology. (A) Western blot analysis of utrophin in myotubes from control individual (Ctrl), NT, and PDN. (B) Western blot analysis of laminin in Ctrl, NT, and PDN. (C) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of MMP-2 in Ctrl, NT, and PDN. (D) Western blot analysis of MMP-9 in Ctrl, NT, and PDN. (E) Western blot analysis of α7 integrin in Ctrl, NT, and PDN. Data in Figure are shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05 vs. Ctrl, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05 vs. NT (Student’s t-test).