Literature DB >> 30559501

Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.

Miranda R Andrus1, Sharon L K McDonough2, Kristi W Kelley1, Pamela L Stamm1, Emily K McCoy1, Katelin M Lisenby1, Heather P Whitley1, Nicole Slater1, Dana G Carroll1, E Kelly Hester1, Allison Meyer Helmer1, Cherry W Jackson1, Debbie C Byrd3.   

Abstract

Objective. To develop and establish validity for a grading rubric to evaluate diabetes subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) note writing on primary care (PC) advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs), and to assess reliability and student perceptions of the rubric. Methods. Ten PC APPE faculty members collaborated to develop a rubric to provide formative and summative feedback on three written SOAP notes per APPE student over a 10-month period. Correlation analyses were conducted between rubric scores and three criterion variables to assess criterion-related validity: APPE grades, Pharmaceutical Care Ability Profile Scores, and Global Impression Scores. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability testing were completed using Cohen's kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Student perceptions were assessed through an anonymous student survey. Results. Fifty-one students and 167 SOAP notes were evaluated using the final rubric. The mean score significantly increased from the first to second SOAP note and from the first to third SOAP note. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between final rubric scores and criterion variables. The ICC for inter-rater reliability was fair (.59) for final rubric scores and excellent for intra-rater reliability (.98 to1.00). Students responded that the rubric improved their ability (84.9%) and confidence (92.4%) to write SOAP notes. Conclusion. The rubric may be used to make valid decisions about students' SOAP note writing ability and may increase their confidence in this area. The use of the rubric allows for greater reliability among multiple graders, supporting grading consistency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SOAP note; experiential education; reliability; rubric; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30559501      PMCID: PMC6291674          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  Using electronic medical records to teach patient-centered care.

Authors:  Jeanne E Frenzel
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Integration of an Internet-based medical chart into a pharmacotherapy lecture series.

Authors:  Michael C Brown; Michael Kotlyar; Jeannine M Conway; Randall Seifert; John V St Peter
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A systems approach to scaffold communication skills development.

Authors:  Lourdes G Planas; Nelson L Er
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Documentation: a value proposition for pharmacy education and the pharmacy profession.

Authors:  George E MacKinnon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  A pharmacotherapy capstone course to advance pharmacy students' clinical documentation skills.

Authors:  Jeannine M Conway; Ghada F Ahmed
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Assessment of SOAP note evaluation tools in colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Karen R Sando; Elizabeth Skoy; Courtney Bradley; Jeanne Frenzel; Jennifer Kirwin; Elizabeth Urteaga
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  An introductory pharmacy practice experience based on a medication therapy management service model.

Authors:  Chanel F Agness; Donna Huynh; Nicole Brandt
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Therapeutic outcomes monitoring: application of pharmaceutical care guidelines to community pharmacy.

Authors:  T J Grainger-Rousseau; M A Miralles; C D Hepler; R Segal; R E Doty; R Ben-Joseph
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses.

Authors:  Kristin R Villa; Tracy L Sprunger; Alison M Walton; Tracy J Costello; Alex N Isaacs
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nelson; Rebecca B Carlson; Amanda H Corbett; Dennis M Williams; Denise H Rhoney
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Community pharmacy-based SOAP notes documentation.

Authors:  Binaya Sapkota; Rajiv Shrestha; Shimonraj Giri
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.