Literature DB >> 30559301

Appetitive behavior of the honey bee Apis mellifera in response to phenolic compounds naturally found in nectars.

Ismael Gatica Hernández1,2,3, Florencia Palottini4,5, Ivana Macri4,5,6, Claudio Rómulo Galmarini1,3,7, Walter Marcelo Farina8,5.   

Abstract

The honey bee is the most frequently used species in pollination services for diverse crops. In onion crops (Allium cepa), however, bees avoid visiting certain varieties, being attracted differently to male sterile (MS) and fertile (OP) lines. These differences might be based on the phenolic profiles of the cultivars' nectars. To understand the relationship between nectar composition and pollinator attraction to different onion lines, we tested sensory and cognitive abilities and palatability in honey bees exposed to MS and OP onion nectars and sugar solutions mimicking them. We evaluated the proboscis extension response (PER) after antennal contact (unconditioned response) to MS or OP onion nectars, finding no statistical differences, which indicates similar gustatory perception for the two nectars. We also performed food uptake assays to test palatability of different artificial nectars, considering their flavonoids and potassium content. The presence of potassium decreased the palatability of the artificial nectars. Finally, we evaluated the bees' cognitive abilities when the reward (unconditioned stimulus) offered during conditioning PER assays presents differences in composition. We found that potassium by itself impaired learning; however, such impairment was even higher when naringenin and quercetin were added in the unconditioned stimulus (MS nectar mimic). Interestingly, potassium together with luteolin (OP nectar mimic) improved learning. Our study demonstrates that the differences in the nectars' flavonoid profiles combined with their high potassium content could explain the previously reported differences in attractiveness between onion lines, suggesting an important role of nectar compounds other than sugars for the attractiveness of flowers to pollinators.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flavonoid; Food uptake; Olfactory learning; Onion nectar; Pollination; Responsiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30559301     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.189910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Nectar non-protein amino acids (NPAAs) do not change nectar palatability but enhance learning and memory in honey bees.

Authors:  Daniele Carlesso; Stefania Smargiassi; Elisa Pasquini; Giacomo Bertelli; David Baracchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Effect of Naringenin and Its Derivatives on the Probing Behavior of Myzus persicae (Sulz.).

Authors:  Katarzyna Stec; Joanna Kozłowska; Anna Wróblewska-Kurdyk; Bożena Kordan; Mirosław Anioł; Beata Gabryś
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Flowers as viral hot spots: Honey bees (Apis mellifera) unevenly deposit viruses across plant species.

Authors:  Samantha A Alger; P Alexander Burnham; Alison K Brody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Learning of a mimic odor combined with nectar nonsugar compounds enhances honeybee pollination of a commercial crop.

Authors:  M Cecilia Estravis-Barcala; Florencia Palottini; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Discovery of octopamine and tyramine in nectar and their effects on bumblebee behavior.

Authors:  Felicity Muth; Casey S Philbin; Christopher S Jeffrey; Anne S Leonard
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.