Literature DB >> 30559174

Home monitoring of heart rate and heart rhythm with a smartphone-based ECG in dogs.

Tommaso Vezzosi1,2, Rosalba Tognetti1, Carlotta Buralli1, Federica Marchesotti2, Valentina Patata2, Eric Zini2,3,4, Oriol Domenech2.   

Abstract

The feasibility of the home monitoring of heart rate (HR) and rhythm through ECG tracings recorded by owners with a smartphone ECG device was evaluated in dogs. Smartphone ECG tracings were recorded by owners at home using a single-lead ECG device and sent via email for interpretation. A questionnaire was prepared to assess the owner's opinion regarding this home monitoring service. Recordings were evaluated by two operators, and agreement was evaluated for HR and rhythm diagnosis. Thirty-three dogs were included. Thirty-one owners (94 per cent) felt that the recording technique was easy to learn and that the smartphone ECG device was easy to use. A total of 15 owners (45 per cent) required a second person to hold the dog during recording. Of the 150 smartphone ECG tracings that were received, 134 (89 per cent) were interpretable. The median difference between the two operators to assess the mean HR on the smartphone tracings was 10 bpm (-10, +25 bpm). Perfect agreement (κ=1) between operators was observed in the heart rhythm evaluation. Most owners sent adequate ECG tracings for interpretation via email from their smartphone. Home monitoring of HR and heart rhythm may represent an additional tool in the management of dogs with arrhythmias. © British Veterinary Association 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alivecor; arrhythmia; electrocardiography; iphone; owner

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30559174     DOI: 10.1136/vr.104917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of heart rate obtained from shorter duration Holter recordings to 24-hour mean heart rate in dogs with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tamilselvam Gunasekaran; Bari Olivier; Lucas Griffith; Robert Sanders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses.

Authors:  Elena Alberti; Luca Stucchi; Valeria Pesce; Giovanni Stancari; Elisabetta Ferro; Francesco Ferrucci; Enrica Zucca
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2020-12-21

3.  Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.

Authors:  Valentina Vitale; Tommaso Vezzosi; Rosalba Tognetti; Carlotta Fraschetti; Micaela Sgorbini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.