Literature DB >> 30559169

Impact of Breast Cancer Subtypes on Prognosis of Women with Operable Invasive Breast Cancer: A Population-based Study Using SEER Database.

Ki-Tae Hwang1, Jongjin Kim2, Jiwoong Jung3, Ji Hyun Chang4, Young Jun Chai2, So Won Oh5, Sohee Oh6, Young A Kim7, Sung Bae Park8, Kyu Ri Hwang9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic roles of breast cancer subtypes in females with operable invasive breast cancer.Experimental Design: Data of 321,958 patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. Breast cancer subtypes were classified into four categories according to the status of hormone receptor (HRc) and HER2: HRc(+)/HER2(-), HRc(+)/HER2(+), HRc(-)/HER2(+), and HRc(-)/HER2(-).
RESULTS: Proportions of HRc(+)/HER2(-), HRc(+)/HER2(+), HRc(-)/HER2(+), HRc(-)/HER2(-), and unknown subtype were 70.3%, 9.4%, 3.9%, 10.4%, and 6.0%, respectively. HRc(+)/HER2(-) showed the highest 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate (95.5%), followed by HRc(+)/HER2(+) (94.1%), HRc(-)/HER2(+) (89.3%), and HRc(-)/HER2(-) (83.1%). HRc(+)/HER2(-) and HRc(+)/HER2(+) showed higher 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (88.4% and 88.2%, respectively) than HRc(-)/HER2(+) and HRc(-)/HER2(-) (83.9% and 76.5%, respectively). HRc(-)/HER2(-) showed the worst BCSS irrespective of race, age, or stage. Although proportions of HRc(-)/HER2(-) in the subgroup with negative event regarding BCSS and OS were 10.4% and 10.2%, respectively, they were 34.2% and 22.7%, respectively, in the subgroup with positive event. Subtype was a significant factor in both univariable and multivariable analyses regarding both BCSS and OS (all P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer subtype was a significant independent prognostic factor regarding both BCSS and OS in multivariable analyses. HRc(+) subtypes showed better prognosis compared with HRc(-) subtypes regarding both BCSS and OS. HRc(-)/HER2(+) showed better prognosis than HRc(-)/HER2(-) but worse prognosis than HRc(+) subtypes regarding both BCSS and OS. The triple-negative subtype showed the worst BCSS compared with the other subtypes irrespective of race, age, or stage. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30559169     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  30 in total

1.  Breast cancer in young black women.

Authors:  S M Walsh; E C Zabor; J Flynn; M Stempel; M Morrow; M L Gemignani
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Update on triple-negative breast cancer disparities for the United States: A population-based study from the United States Cancer Statistics database, 2010 through 2014.

Authors:  Lia C Scott; Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Dora Il'yasova
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Development and Validation of Web-Based Nomograms for Predicting Cause-Specific Mortality in Surgically Resected Nonmetastatic Invasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Guangyong Chen; Mei Jia; Qingpeng Zeng; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  What Is the Real Impact of Estrogen Receptor Status on the Prognosis and Treatment of HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Mariana Brandão; Rafael Caparica; Luca Malorni; Aleix Prat; Lisa A Carey; Martine Piccart
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Resistance to Standard Systemic Chemotherapies.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Furuta; Junichiro Watanabe; Takeshi Aramaki; Akifumi Notsu; Hirofumi Yasui
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Independent Validation of the PAM50-Based Chemo-Endocrine Score (CES) in Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Tomás Pascual; Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez; Maki Tanioka; M Vittoria Dieci; Sonia Pernas; Joaquin Gavila; Valentina Guarnieri; Javier Cortes; Patricia Villagrasa; Núria Chic; Maria Vidal; Barbara Adamo; Montserrat Muñoz; Gaia Griguolo; Antonio Llombart; Pierfranco Conte; Mafalda Oliveira; Benedetta Conte; Laia Paré; Patricia Galvan; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Aleix Prat
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Lasofoxifene as a potential treatment for therapy-resistant ER-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Muriel Lainé; Sean W Fanning; Ya-Fang Chang; Bradley Green; Marianne E Greene; Barry Komm; Justyna D Kurleto; Linda Phung; Geoffrey L Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Howard A Burris; Arlene Chan; Aditya Bardia; J Thaddeus Beck; Joohyuk Sohn; Patrick Neven; Debu Tripathy; Seock-Ah Im; Stephen Chia; Francisco J Esteva; Lowell Hart; Juan Pablo Zarate; Antonia Ridolfi; Karen Rodriguez Lorenc; Denise A Yardley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 9.075

9.  Hierarchical clustering of PI3K and MAPK pathway proteins in breast cancer intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Dinja T Kruger; Mark Opdam; Joyce Sanders; Vincent van der Noort; Epie Boven; Sabine C Linn
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.205

10.  Differences in the prognosis of gastric cancer patients of different sexes and races and the molecular mechanisms involved.

Authors:  Huafu Li; Chunming Wang; Zhewei Wei; Wei Chen; Zicong Guo; Yulong He; Changhua Zhang
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.