Literature DB >> 30559123

Father-Son Communication About Consistent and Correct Condom Use.

Vincent Guilamo-Ramos1,2, Marco Thimm-Kaiser3, Adam Benzekri3, Christopher Rodriguez3, Taleria R Fuller4, Lee Warner4, Emilia H A Koumans4.   

Abstract

: media-1vid15852345835001PEDS-VA_2018-1609Video Abstract
OBJECTIVES: With this study, we explore communication about consistent and correct condom use among African American and Latino male adolescents ages 15 to 19 and their fathers.
METHODS: Twenty-five father-son dyads completed semistructured interviews designed to elicit specific preferences for teaching and learning about consistent and correct condom use and strategies for addressing common condom use errors and problems. For analysis, we used in vivo coding and vertical and horizontal analysis techniques.
RESULTS: Fathers and sons agreed that communication about condom use is feasible and acceptable. However, fathers tended to convey vague messages regarding protecting oneself from the negative consequences of sexual activity. Furthermore, both fathers and sons reported barriers hindering conversations. Secondly, the style and frequency of condom use conversations can help overcome barriers and support father-son relationship management. Talking frequently in 1-on-1 settings and using strategies to reduce discomfort made communication easier. Lastly, fathers and sons reported distinct preferences for teaching and learning about condom use. Sons wanted fathers to give specific guidance on the use and management of condoms. Fathers expressed interest in opportunities for improving their own condom knowledge and skills. Fathers identified gaps in their own condom use knowledge as a limitation to effective instruction of their sons.
CONCLUSIONS: A father-focused communication intervention about condom use is feasible and acceptable. Enhancing the intergenerational benefits of father-son communication by addressing specific father-son preferences and learning needs for condom use instruction, as well as communication barriers, represents a novel mechanism for reducing male sexual reproductive health disparities.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30559123     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  5 in total

1.  A Triadic Intervention for Adolescent Sexual Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Vincent Guilamo-Ramos; Adam Benzekri; Marco Thimm-Kaiser; Patricia Dittus; Yumary Ruiz; Charles M Cleland; Wanda McCoy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Parents' Sources of Adolescent Sexual Health Information and Their Interest in Resources From Primary Care.

Authors:  Christopher J Mehus; Stephanie Aldrin; Riley J Steiner; Pooja Brar; Janna R Gewirtz O'Brien; Julie Gorzkowski; Stephanie Grilo; Jonathan D Klein; Annie-Laurie McRee; Christina Ross; John Santelli; Renee E Sieving
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Gender Differences in Sex Education in China: A Structural Topic Modeling Analysis Based on Online Knowledge Community Zhihu.

Authors:  Wen Shi; Yuxuan Lin; Zihan Zhang; Jing Su
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  Methodological strategies to engage young black and Latino heterosexual couples in sexual and reproductive health research.

Authors:  Yzette Lanier; Alena Campo; Claudine Lavarin; Ashley Toussaint; Marya Gwadz; Vincent Guilamo-Ramos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Moving from Needs Assessment to Intervention: Fathers' Perspectives on Their Needs and Support for Talk with Teens about Sex.

Authors:  Jennifer M Grossman; Amanda M Richer; Belinda F Hernandez; Christine M Markham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.