Literature DB >> 30558758

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Disease.

Pedro Freitas1, Márcio Madeira2, Luís Raposo3, Sérgio Madeira3, João Brito3, Catarina Brízido3, Francisco Gama3, Nélson Vale3, Sara Ranchordás2, Pedro Magro2, Ana Braga2, Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves3, Henrique Mesquita Gabriel3, Tiago Nolasco2, Sérgio Boshoff2, Marta Marques2, Luís Bruges2, José Calquinha2, Miguel Sousa-Uva2, Miguel Abecasis2, Manuel Almeida3, José Pedro Neves2, Miguel Mendes3.   

Abstract

Current recommendations on the optimal revascularization strategy in Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with left main (LM) or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are based upon randomized clinical trials conducted in stable coronary artery disease. In a real-world contemporary observational registry, we compared the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD (n = 1,104) submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimized medical therapy (OMT). The primary end point was 5-year all-cause mortality. Results were assessed in the entire population (CABG 289, PCI 399, and OMT 416) and in a propensity score-matched cohort of CABG (n = 159) and PCI (n = 159). Crude 5-year mortality rates in CABG and PCI were 25.3% versus 29.6%, respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.9 to 1.6; p = 0.212); OMT, however, was associated with a twofold higher risk of mortality when compared with any revascularization strategy (unadjusted HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.5; p < 0.001). After propensity score-matching and multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of the primary end point in patients who underwent PCI versus CABG (31% vs 21%; adjusted HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.50; p = 0.094). This was a consistent finding over subgroups deemed clinically relevant, such as in patients with LM or proximal left anterior descending disease, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23 and left ventricle ejection fraction <40%. In conclusion, in a real-world cohort of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD, those selected for OMT had a dire outcome. Although adjusted 5-year mortality was statistically similar between revascularization strategies, there was a trend favoring CABG, which might be the preferred option in LM, proximal LAD, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23, and left ventricle ejection fraction <40% subgroups.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30558758     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of SYNTAX and Gensini Scores in the Decision of Surgery or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Bedrettin Boyraz; Tezcan Peker
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  Comparison of invasive treatment strategies in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rikuta Hamaya; Yuan Ting Chang; Api Chewcharat; Nicholas Chiu; Taishi Yonetsu; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Stefania Papatheodorou
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-09-08

3.  Outcome of acute myocardial infarction versus stable coronary artery disease patients treated with coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  Markus Malmberg; Jarmo Gunn; Päivi Rautava; Jussi Sipilä; Ville Kytö
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Hristo Kirov; Tulio Caldonazo; Mohamed Rahouma; N Bryce Robinson; Michelle Demetres; Patrick W Serruys; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Mario Gaudino; Torsten Doenst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.