Luisa Meyerholz1, Julia Irzinger1, Michael Witthöft2, Alexander L Gerlach1, Anna Pohl3. 1. Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 2. Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Mainz, Germany. 3. Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: anna.pohl@uni-koeln.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Deviations in interoception might contribute to the development and maintenance of mental disorders. The improvement of interoceptive accuracy (IA) is desirable but assessment and training methods remain controversial. For instance, it was assumed that performance increases in heartbeat counting paradigms after cardiac feedback were due to an improvement of knowledge with regard to heart rate rather than due to an actual improvement in IA. METHODS: Here, we examined effects of contingent cardiac feedback training, non-contingent cardiac feedback, mindfulness practice, and a waiting period with external attentional focus on IA. 100 healthy participants underwent a mental tracking paradigm before and after 20 min of training or waiting. RESULTS: Results revealed a significant increase of IA in the contingent feedback condition (d = 1.21, p ≤ .001) and no significant changes after non-contingent feedback, mindfulness practice or waiting (d ≤ 0.37; p ≥ .06). Furthermore, IA increase was significantly higher after the contingent feedback training compared to all other conditions, including non-contingent feedback. LIMITATIONS: Future studies need to replicate these findings in clinical samples and examine time dependent effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence for the trainability of heartbeat perception. IA improvements may reduce the symptom burden in people suffering from mental disorders and psychophysiological conditions that have been linked to lower interoceptive accuracy such as depression, somatic symptom disorder, chronic pain, and functional somatic syndromes. Consequently, exploration of biofeedback training procedures shall be continued with the aim of identifying relevant mediators of beneficial effects and future implementation in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Deviations in interoception might contribute to the development and maintenance of mental disorders. The improvement of interoceptive accuracy (IA) is desirable but assessment and training methods remain controversial. For instance, it was assumed that performance increases in heartbeat counting paradigms after cardiac feedback were due to an improvement of knowledge with regard to heart rate rather than due to an actual improvement in IA. METHODS: Here, we examined effects of contingent cardiac feedback training, non-contingent cardiac feedback, mindfulness practice, and a waiting period with external attentional focus on IA. 100 healthy participants underwent a mental tracking paradigm before and after 20 min of training or waiting. RESULTS: Results revealed a significant increase of IA in the contingent feedback condition (d = 1.21, p ≤ .001) and no significant changes after non-contingent feedback, mindfulness practice or waiting (d ≤ 0.37; p ≥ .06). Furthermore, IA increase was significantly higher after the contingent feedback training compared to all other conditions, including non-contingent feedback. LIMITATIONS: Future studies need to replicate these findings in clinical samples and examine time dependent effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence for the trainability of heartbeat perception. IA improvements may reduce the symptom burden in people suffering from mental disorders and psychophysiological conditions that have been linked to lower interoceptive accuracy such as depression, somatic symptom disorder, chronic pain, and functional somatic syndromes. Consequently, exploration of biofeedback training procedures shall be continued with the aim of identifying relevant mediators of beneficial effects and future implementation in clinical practice.
Authors: Laura B Bragdon; Goi Khia Eng; Amanda Belanger; Katherine A Collins; Emily R Stern Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Inken Höller; Jana-Sophie Stenzel; Dajana Rath; Thomas Forkmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.390