Literature DB >> 30557528

Evaluation of metabolite-microbe correlation detection methods.

Yijun You1, Dandan Liang1, Runmin Wei2, Mengci Li1, Yitao Li1, Jingye Wang3, Xiaoyan Wang4, Xiaojiao Zheng1, Wei Jia5, Tianlu Chen6.   

Abstract

Different correlation detection methods have been specifically designed for the microbiome data analysis considering the compositional data structure and different sequencing depths. Along with the speedy development of omics studies, there is an increasing interest in discovering the biological associations between microbes and host metabolites. This raises the need of finding proper statistical methods that facilitate the correlation analysis across different omics studies. Here, we comprehensively evaluated six different correlation methods, i.e., Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, Sparse Correlations for Compositional data (SparCC), Correlation inference for Compositional data through Lasso (CCLasso), Mutual Information Coefficient (MIC), and Cosine similarity methods, for the correlations detection between microbes and metabolites. Three simulated and two real-world data sets (from public databases and our lab) were used to examine the performance of each method regarding its specificity, sensitivity, similarity, accuracy, and stability with different sparsity. Our results indicate that although each method has its own pros and cons in different scenarios, Spearman correlation and MIC outperform the others with their overall performances. A strategic guidance was also proposed for the correlation analysis between microbe and metabolite.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Correlation analysis; Metabolome; Microbiome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30557528     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  5 in total

1.  Deep in the Bowel: Highly Interpretable Neural Encoder-Decoder Networks Predict Gut Metabolites from Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Vuong Le; Thomas P Quinn; Truyen Tran; Svetha Venkatesh
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  On the Use of Correlation and MI as a Measure of Metabolite-Metabolite Association for Network Differential Connectivity Analysis.

Authors:  Sanjeevan Jahagirdar; Edoardo Saccenti
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-04-24

3.  A Bayesian method for identifying associations between response variables and bacterial community composition.

Authors:  Adrian Verster; Nicholas Petronella; Judy Green; Fernando Matias; Stephen P J Brooks
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  Microbial Profiles of Retail Pacific Oysters (Crassostrea gigas) From Guangdong Province, China.

Authors:  Mingjia Yu; Xiaobo Wang; Aixian Yan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Differential Influence of Soluble Dietary Fibres on Intestinal and Hepatic Carbohydrate Response.

Authors:  Matthew G Pontifex; Aleena Mushtaq; Gwenaëlle Le Gall; Ildefonso Rodriguez-Ramiro; Britt Anne Blokker; Mara E M Hoogteijling; Matthew Ricci; Michael Pellizzon; David Vauzour; Michael Müller
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.