Kenji Fujita1, Kazuki Kushida2, Rebekah J Moles1, Timothy F Chen1. 1. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Faculty of Pharmacy, Showa Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
AIM: In Japan, home pharmaceutical care (HPC) has recently been provided to home-bound older adults who have difficulties in accessing a community pharmacy, for regular medicine supplies and medication management. Although the number of HPC services provided has increased, HPC is not always carried out by clinically well-trained pharmacists, causing differences in the quality of HPC provided. The aim of the present study was to establish the quality dimensions of HPC (i.e. components that impact the quality of HPC) from the perspectives of home healthcare professionals. METHODS: Semistructured interviews and focus groups were carried out with nine home healthcare teams, comprising 61 multidisciplinary professionals including pharmacists, doctors, nurses, care managers, home helpers, medical social workers and other relevant stakeholders involved in home healthcare. Participants' responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Identified themes were then categorized using Donabedian's framework (structure, process and outcome). RESULTS: Nine themes and 27 subthemes emerged, including: structure (pharmacist factors, pharmacy factors and external factors), process (before HPC, during HPC, after HPC and outside of HPC) and outcome (impact on patients and impact on other healthcare professionals). CONCLUSION: This study has identified quality dimensions of HPC from multidisciplinary home healthcare professionals' perspectives. These findings might be used to inform aspects of HPC that require improvement. In order to evaluate the quality of HPC, a set of indicators based on the identified quality dimensions could be developed. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 35-43.
AIM: In Japan, home pharmaceutical care (HPC) has recently been provided to home-bound older adults who have difficulties in accessing a community pharmacy, for regular medicine supplies and medication management. Although the number of HPC services provided has increased, HPC is not always carried out by clinically well-trained pharmacists, causing differences in the quality of HPC provided. The aim of the present study was to establish the quality dimensions of HPC (i.e. components that impact the quality of HPC) from the perspectives of home healthcare professionals. METHODS: Semistructured interviews and focus groups were carried out with nine home healthcare teams, comprising 61 multidisciplinary professionals including pharmacists, doctors, nurses, care managers, home helpers, medical social workers and other relevant stakeholders involved in home healthcare. Participants' responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Identified themes were then categorized using Donabedian's framework (structure, process and outcome). RESULTS: Nine themes and 27 subthemes emerged, including: structure (pharmacist factors, pharmacy factors and external factors), process (before HPC, during HPC, after HPC and outside of HPC) and outcome (impact on patients and impact on other healthcare professionals). CONCLUSION: This study has identified quality dimensions of HPC from multidisciplinary home healthcare professionals' perspectives. These findings might be used to inform aspects of HPC that require improvement. In order to evaluate the quality of HPC, a set of indicators based on the identified quality dimensions could be developed. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 35-43.