Literature DB >> 30556191

Exposing the impact of intensive advice services on health: A realist evaluation.

Sonia Michelle Dalkin1,2, Natalie Forster1,2, Philip Hodgson3, Monique Lhussier1,2, Pete Philipson4, Susan Mary Carr1,2,5.   

Abstract

Attention has turned to welfare advice as a potential health and social care intervention. However, establishing direct evidence of health impact has proven difficult. This is compounded by the need to understand both the facilitative contexts and mechanisms through which this impact occurs. This study investigated if, how and in which circumstances an intensive advice service had an impact on stress and well-being (as precursors to health impacts), for clients attending a branch of Citizens Advice, located in the North East of England. A mixed methods realist evaluation of three intensive advice services offered by Citizens Advice (CA) was operationalised in five phases: (a) Building programme theories, (b) refining programme theories, (c) Development of a data recording tool, (d) Testing programme theories with empirical data, (e) Impact interviews. This paper focuses on phase 4. The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) were completed by 191 clients, with a 91% follow-up rate (data collected: February 2016 to March 2017). Twenty-two CA clients participated in interviews (data collected: October 2015 to November 2016). The PSS indicated a significant decrease in stress from initial consultation to approximately 4-6 weeks post advice from 31.4 to 10.3 (p < 0.001) and the WEMWBS indicated a significant increase in client well-being from a mean of 26.9 to 46.5 (p < 0.001). Nine refined programme theories are presented which combine the qualitative and quantitative analysis; they are underpinned by three abstract theories: Capabilities model, The Decision to Trust Model, and Third Space. An explanatory framework is presented covering the micro, meso, and macro levels of CA. Use of a stress and well-being lens has allowed insight into the precursors of health in those receiving intensive advice. Using these measures whilst explaining contextual and mechanistic properties, begins to build a complex and real picture of how advice services impact on health.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advice services; evaluation research; realist; stress; trust; well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30556191     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  5 in total

1.  'Everything takes too long and nobody is listening': Developing theory to understand the impact of advice on stress and the ability to cope.

Authors:  Jawwad Mustafa; Philip Hodgson; Monique Lhussier; Natalie Forster; Susan Mary Carr; Sonia Michelle Dalkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  A Rapid Realist Review of Effective Mental Health Interventions for Individuals with Chronic Physical Health Conditions during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Systems-Level Mental Health Promotion Framework.

Authors:  Lorna Stabler; Maura MacPhee; Benjamin Collins; Simon Carroll; Karen Davison; Vidhi Thakkar; Esme Fuller-Thomson; Shen Lamson Lin; Brandon Hey
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Maximising the health impacts of free advice services in the UK: A mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  David Young; Geoff Bates
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2022-03-21

4.  A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Genevieve Coorey; David Peiris; Lis Neubeck; Julie Redfern
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  "If you are on duty, you may be afraid to come out to attend to a person": fear of crime and security challenges in maternal acute care in Nigeria from a realist perspective.

Authors:  Enyi Etiaba; Ana Manzano; Uju Agbawodikeizu; Udochukwu Ogu; Bassey Ebenso; Benjamin Uzochukwu; Obinna Onwujekwe; Nkoli Ezumah; Tolib Mirzoev
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.