Adam J Kimple1, Stanley W McClurg1, Benjamin Y Huang2, Satyan B Sreenath1, Benjamin W McClintock2, Mohamed Tomoum3, Feng-Chang Lin4, Charles S Ebert1, Brent A Senior1,5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. 4. Carolina Translational and Clinical Science Institute, USA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concerns about radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) imaging have renewed interest in iterative reconstruction (IR), a technique which has the potential to produce images with less noise at lower radiation doses than traditional filtered back projection (FBP). This study aimed to assess whether application of IR could provide comparable quality sinus CT images to FBP at lower kilovolt (kV) and milliamp (mA) settings, and to establish optimal scan settings for sinus imaging. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL: 30 sinus CT scans were performed on 5 cadaver heads at two kV setting and three mA settings. Each scan was reconstructed using FBP and 3 IR settings, yielding a total of 120 images series. Each image set was blinded and randomly reviewed by 3 rhinologists and 2 neuroradiologists. Using a 5-point Likert scale, 16 anatomical landmarks, were graded with respect to image quality. Data were assessed with respect to dose and IR settings using statistical analysis. RESULTS: Higher kV and mAs settings produced significantly higher quality images for structure identification across all 16 landmarks; however, the suitability for surgery did not increase in a linear fashion and plateaued by a total radiation dose of 0.1201 mSv. IR algorithm did not provide a benefit in the overall score of scans at a fixed kV and mAs. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of structures in sinus CT imaging significantly correlate with the kV and mA and overall dose of radiation; however, IR did not provide additional benefit in the image quality.
BACKGROUND: Concerns about radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) imaging have renewed interest in iterative reconstruction (IR), a technique which has the potential to produce images with less noise at lower radiation doses than traditional filtered back projection (FBP). This study aimed to assess whether application of IR could provide comparable quality sinus CT images to FBP at lower kilovolt (kV) and milliamp (mA) settings, and to establish optimal scan settings for sinus imaging. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL: 30 sinus CT scans were performed on 5 cadaver heads at two kV setting and three mA settings. Each scan was reconstructed using FBP and 3 IR settings, yielding a total of 120 images series. Each image set was blinded and randomly reviewed by 3 rhinologists and 2 neuroradiologists. Using a 5-point Likert scale, 16 anatomical landmarks, were graded with respect to image quality. Data were assessed with respect to dose and IR settings using statistical analysis. RESULTS: Higher kV and mAs settings produced significantly higher quality images for structure identification across all 16 landmarks; however, the suitability for surgery did not increase in a linear fashion and plateaued by a total radiation dose of 0.1201 mSv. IR algorithm did not provide a benefit in the overall score of scans at a fixed kV and mAs. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of structures in sinus CT imaging significantly correlate with the kV and mA and overall dose of radiation; however, IR did not provide additional benefit in the image quality.
Authors: Richard R Orlandi; Todd T Kingdom; Peter H Hwang; Timothy L Smith; Jeremiah A Alt; Fuad M Baroody; Pete S Batra; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Neil Bhattacharyya; Rakesh K Chandra; Alexander Chiu; Martin J Citardi; Noam A Cohen; John DelGaudio; Martin Desrosiers; Hun-Jong Dhong; Richard Douglas; Berrylin Ferguson; Wytske J Fokkens; Christos Georgalas; Andrew Goldberg; Jan Gosepath; Daniel L Hamilos; Joseph K Han; Richard Harvey; Peter Hellings; Claire Hopkins; Roger Jankowski; Amin R Javer; Robert Kern; Stilianos Kountakis; Marek L Kowalski; Andrew Lane; Donald C Lanza; Richard Lebowitz; Heung-Man Lee; Sandra Y Lin; Valerie Lund; Amber Luong; Wolf Mann; Bradley F Marple; Kevin C McMains; Ralph Metson; Robert Naclerio; Jayakar V Nayak; Nobuyoshi Otori; James N Palmer; Sanjay R Parikh; Desiderio Passali; Anju Peters; Jay Piccirillo; David M Poetker; Alkis J Psaltis; Hassan H Ramadan; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Herbert Riechelmann; Hwan-Jung Roh; Luke Rudmik; Raymond Sacks; Rodney J Schlosser; Brent A Senior; Raj Sindwani; James A Stankiewicz; Michael Stewart; Bruce K Tan; Elina Toskala; Richard Voegels; De Yun Wang; Erik K Weitzel; Sarah Wise; Bradford A Woodworth; Peter-John Wormald; Erin D Wright; Bing Zhou; David W Kennedy Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: B Schulz; M Beeres; B Bodelle; R Bauer; F Al-Butmeh; A Thalhammer; T J Vogl; J M Kerl Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gavin Setzen; Berrylin J Ferguson; Joseph K Han; John S Rhee; Rebecca S Cornelius; Stuart J Froum; Grant S Gillman; Steven M Houser; Paul R Krakovitz; Ashkan Monfared; James N Palmer; Kristina W Rosbe; Michael Setzen; Milesh M Patel Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Wytske J Fokkens; Valerie J Lund; Joachim Mullol; Claus Bachert; Isam Alobid; Fuad Baroody; Noam Cohen; Anders Cervin; Richard Douglas; Philippe Gevaert; Christos Georgalas; Herman Goossens; Richard Harvey; Peter Hellings; Claire Hopkins; Nick Jones; Guy Joos; Livije Kalogjera; Bob Kern; Marek Kowalski; David Price; Herbert Riechelmann; Rodney Schlosser; Brent Senior; Mike Thomas; Elina Toskala; Richard Voegels; De Yun Wang; Peter John Wormald Journal: Rhinology Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.681