Literature DB >> 30555773

Using machine learning to identify health outcomes from electronic health record data.

Jenna Wong1, Mara Murray Horwitz1, Li Zhou2,3, Sengwee Toh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Electronic health records (EHRs) contain valuable data for identifying health outcomes, but these data also present numerous challenges when creating computable phenotyping algorithms. Machine learning methods could help with some of these challenges. In this review, we discuss four common scenarios that researchers may find helpful for thinking critically about when and for what tasks machine learning may be used to identify health outcomes from EHR data. RECENT
FINDINGS: We first consider the conditions in which machine learning may be especially useful with respect to two dimensions of a health outcome: 1) the characteristics of its diagnostic criteria, and 2) the format in which its diagnostic data are usually stored within EHR systems. In the first dimension, we propose that for health outcomes with diagnostic criteria involving many clinical factors, vague definitions, or subjective interpretations, machine learning may be useful for modeling the complex diagnostic decision-making process from a vector of clinical inputs to identify individuals with the health outcome. In the second dimension, we propose that for health outcomes where diagnostic information is largely stored in unstructured formats such as free text or images, machine learning may be useful for extracting and structuring this information as part of a natural language processing system or an image recognition task. We then consider these two dimensions jointly to define four common scenarios of health outcomes. For each scenario, we discuss the potential uses for machine learning - first assuming accurate and complete EHR data and then relaxing these assumptions to accommodate the limitations of real-world EHR systems. We illustrate these four scenarios using concrete examples and describe how recent studies have used machine learning to identify these health outcomes from EHR data.
SUMMARY: Machine learning has great potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of health outcome identification from EHR systems, especially under certain conditions. To promote the use of machine learning in EHR-based phenotyping tasks, future work should prioritize efforts to increase the transportability of machine learning algorithms for use in multi-site settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort identification; electronic health records; health outcomes; machine learning; phenotyping

Year:  2018        PMID: 30555773      PMCID: PMC6289196          DOI: 10.1007/s40471-018-0165-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep


  48 in total

1.  Variability in the interpretation of chest radiographs for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children.

Authors:  Mark I Neuman; Edward Y Lee; Sarah Bixby; Stephanie Diperna; Jeffrey Hellinger; Richard Markowitz; Sabah Servaes; Michael C Monuteaux; Samir S Shah
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications.

Authors:  Guergana K Savova; James J Masanz; Philip V Ogren; Jiaping Zheng; Sunghwan Sohn; Karin C Kipper-Schuler; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology.

Authors:  John D Loeser; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Electronic medical records for discovery research in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Katherine P Liao; Tianxi Cai; Vivian Gainer; Sergey Goryachev; Qing Zeng-treitler; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Peter Szolovits; Susanne Churchill; Shawn Murphy; Isaac Kohane; Elizabeth W Karlson; Robert M Plenge
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Michelle Petri; Ana-Maria Orbai; Graciela S Alarcón; Caroline Gordon; Joan T Merrill; Paul R Fortin; Ian N Bruce; David Isenberg; Daniel J Wallace; Ola Nived; Gunnar Sturfelt; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Sang-Cheol Bae; John G Hanly; Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero; Ann Clarke; Cynthia Aranow; Susan Manzi; Murray Urowitz; Dafna Gladman; Kenneth Kalunian; Melissa Costner; Victoria P Werth; Asad Zoma; Sasha Bernatsky; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Munther A Khamashta; Soren Jacobsen; Jill P Buyon; Peter Maddison; Mary Anne Dooley; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Ellen Ginzler; Thomas Stoll; Christine Peschken; Joseph L Jorizzo; Jeffrey P Callen; S Sam Lim; Barri J Fessler; Murat Inanc; Diane L Kamen; Anisur Rahman; Kristjan Steinsson; Andrew G Franks; Lisa Sigler; Suhail Hameed; Hong Fang; Ngoc Pham; Robin Brey; Michael H Weisman; Gerald McGwin; Laurence S Magder
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-08

6.  Finding falls in ambulatory care clinical documents using statistical text mining.

Authors:  James A McCart; Donald J Berndt; Jay Jarman; Dezon K Finch; Stephen L Luther
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Chapter 13: Mining electronic health records in the genomics era.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Clinical judgement and the medical profession.

Authors:  Gunver S Kienle; Helmut Kiene
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Debate: The slippery slope of surrogate outcomes.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000

Review 10.  Drug safety assessment in clinical trials: methodological challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Sonal Singh; Yoon K Loke
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of Use of Technologies to Facilitate Medical Chart Review.

Authors:  Loreen Straub; Joshua J Gagne; Judith C Maro; Michael D Nguyen; Nicolas Beaulieu; Jeffrey S Brown; Adee Kennedy; Margaret Johnson; Adam Wright; Li Zhou; Shirley V Wang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Applying Machine Learning in Distributed Data Networks for Pharmacoepidemiologic and Pharmacovigilance Studies: Opportunities, Challenges, and Considerations.

Authors:  Jenna Wong; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Peter R Rijnbeek; Rishi J Desai; Jenna M Reps; Sengwee Toh
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.228

3.  A high-throughput phenotyping algorithm is portable from adult to pediatric populations.

Authors:  Alon Geva; Molei Liu; Vidul A Panickan; Paul Avillach; Tianxi Cai; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment: Anticipating a New Level of Complexity.

Authors:  Hassane Alami; Pascale Lehoux; Yannick Auclair; Michèle de Guise; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; James Shaw; Denis Roy; Richard Fleet; Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed; Jean-Paul Fortin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  A Year of Papers Using Biomedical Texts: Findings from the Section on Natural Language Processing of the IMIA Yearbook.

Authors:  Natalia Grabar; Cyril Grouin
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Methods to Characterize Unstructured Patient-Reported Outcomes: Validation Study.

Authors:  Zhaohua Lu; Jin-Ah Sim; Jade X Wang; Christopher B Forrest; Kevin R Krull; Deokumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Justin N Baker; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 7.076

7.  Costs and mortality associated with HIV: a machine learning analysis of the French national health insurance database.

Authors:  Martin Prodel; Laurent Finkielsztejn; Laëtitia Roustand; Gaëlle Nachbaur; Lucie De Leotoing; Marie Genreau; Fabrice Bonnet; Jade Ghosn
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-11-29

8.  Electronic Medical Record-Based Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Risk of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events After Invasive Coronary Treatment: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Osung Kwon; Wonjun Na; Dong Hyun Yang; Young-Hak Kim; Heejun Kang; Tae Joon Jun; Jihoon Kweon; Gyung-Min Park; YongHyun Cho; Cinyoung Hur; Jungwoo Chae; Do-Yoon Kang; Pil Hyung Lee; Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Cheol Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-05-11

9.  Artificial Intelligence, Real-World Automation and the Safety of Medicines.

Authors:  Andrew Bate; Steve F Hobbiger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Machine Learning in Prediction of Bladder Cancer on Clinical Laboratory Data.

Authors:  I-Jung Tsai; Wen-Chi Shen; Chia-Ling Lee; Horng-Dar Wang; Ching-Yu Lin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.