| Literature DB >> 30555630 |
Irina Naletova1,2, Cristina Satriano1,2, Alessandra Curci2,3, Nicola Margiotta2,3, Giovanni Natile2,3, Giuseppe Arena1,2, Diego La Mendola2,4, Vincenzo Giuseppe Nicoletti2,5, Enrico Rizzarelli1,2.
Abstract
Copper homeostasis is generally investigated foEntities:
Keywords: SH-SY5Y cell line; anticancer drug; ionophores; metal homeostasis; oxidative stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 30555630 PMCID: PMC6284747 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Scheme 1Structures of phendione (A) and cuproindione (B) compounds.
Figure 1UV-visible curves of phendione (A, B) and cuproindione (C, D) treated with increasing equivalents (0.2- 1.2 range) of CuCl2 (A, C) or Cu(ClO4)2 (B, D).
Figure 2Species distribution computed for phendione (L) (A) and cuproindione (L’) (B) reproducing the conditions employed in the UV-visible experiments (charges are omitted for clarity); (C) UV-spectra of [Cu(cuproindione)2](ClO4)2·2H2O (solid red line) and a solution of cuproindione having a cuproindione/Cu2+ equal to 1:0.5 (dash black line). Titrate concentration= 6x10-5 M; titrant concentration= 1.8x10-3 M.
Cytotoxicity (as IC50 values, in 10-6 M) of phendione (L), cuproindione (L’), [CuCl(phendione)2]ClO4·3/2H2O (1), [Cu(phendione)3](ClO4)2×4H2O (2), [Cu(cuproindione)2] ClO4)2·2H2O (3) and cisplatin (4, [77])
| L | L’ | 1 | 2 | 3 | L+ BCS | L’+ BCS | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 ± 0.1 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 1.56 ± 0.02 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 2 |
Figure 3Viability of SH-SY5Y cells assessed by IC50 values (µM) following a 48-hrs treatment with phendione or cuproindione, either in the basal culture medium or after pre-incubation (3 hrs) with 50 µM BCS
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM over at least three independent experiments. (*=p ≤ 0.05 level vs phendione, §=p ≤ 0.05 level vs cuproindione; One-way Anova).
Figure 4Effect of phendione or cuproindione treatment on GSH redox state in SH-SY5Y cells treated with a phendione or cuproindione 3 × IC50 concentration for 90 minutes
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM from triplicate experiments and normalized with respect to the control (untreated) cells. (*p ≤ 0.05 level vs control; §p ≤ 0.05 level vs phendione; One-way Anova).
Figure 5Mitochondria polarization of the cells treated with a phendione or cuproindione 3 × IC50 concentration for 90 minutes
(A) fluorescence micrographs; (B) calculated ratios of JC-1 fluorescence emission at 595/530. Mitochondrial O2•− production of the cells treated with a phendione or cuproindione 3 × IC50 concentration for 30 minutes: (C) MitoSOX emission (ex 510, em 580). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM over three independent experiments with eight replicas for each condition (*= p ≤ 0.05 level vs control, § = p ≤ 0.05 level vs phendione; One-way Anova). Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 6Expression of p53 in SH-SY5Y cells after a 48-hr treatment with phendione and cuproindione IC50 concentration in the absence and in the presence of 50 µM BCS
Results are the mean ± SEM over at least three independent experiments. (*p ≤ 0.05 level vs control, §p ≤ 0.05 level vs phendione; One-way Anova).
Figure 7Expression of CTR1 (A), ATP7A (B) and CCS (C) in SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with a phendione (IC50 concentration), cuproindione (IC50 concentration) and BCS (50 µM) for 48 hrs. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM over at least three independent experiments. (*p ≤ 0.05 level with respect to control, One-way Anova).
Figure 8(A, B): Expression of Atox1 detected by polyclonal (A) or monoclonal (B) antibody in SH-SY5Y cells after 48 hrs of treatment. From the left to the right: control cells, cells treated with IC50 concentration of phendione or cuproindione or 50 µM BCS. (C, D): In vitro incubation of the Atox1 purified protein in the absence (C) or presence of H2O2 (D) for 20 hrs. From the left to the right: Atox1; Atox1 + Cu(II) (ratio 1:1); Atox1 + phendione (ratio 1:1); Atox1 + cuproindione (ratio 1:1); Atox1 + phendione + Cu(II) (ratio 1:1:1); Atox1 + cuproindione + Cu(II) (ratio 1:1:1).
Figure 9Confocal micrographs of untreated cells (A) and cells treated for 90 min with 4.4 mM phendione (B) or 2.2 mM cuproindione (C). After treatments cells were stained with copper sensor CS1 (green), Mitotracker Deep Red (red) and Hoechst33342 (blue). From the left to the right, merged channels for: copper + nuclei; mitochondria + nuclei; copper + mitochondria + nuclei. Scale bar= 30 µm.
Figure 10Expression of mitochondrial metallochaperones (A) Sco-1, (B) COX17 and (C) Sco-2 in SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with a phendione, cuproindione IC50 concentration and 50 µM BCS for 48 hrs. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM over at least three independent experiments. (*p ≤ 0.05 level vs control, One-way Anova).