Yi Li1,2,3,4, Qiong Wu1, Yujia Wang1,2,3, Chengxin Weng5, Yuting He1, Mengyu Gao1, Guang Yang6, Li Li1, Fei Chen1, Yujun Shi1, Bruce P Amiot2, Scott L Nyberg2,3, Ji Bao1, Hong Bu1. 1. Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHFPC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China. 2. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Precision Medicine Key Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China. 5. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China. 6. Experimental Animal Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the spheroid reservoir bioartificial liver (SRBAL) with porcine hepatocyte organoids in a preclinical nonhuman primate model of acute liver failure (ALF). Methods: Thirty healthy rhesus monkeys were infused with α-amanitin and lipopolysaccharide and randomized into five groups (ALF alone control group; sham no-cell SRBAL treatment group; groups A, B and C with SRBAL treatment started at 12 h, 24 h and 36 h after induction of ALF, respectively). Animals were continuously treated with the SRBAL device for 6 h and followed for up to 336 h. Results: Survival of ALF monkeys improved with hepatocyte SRBAL treatment compared to control groups. Blood ammonia and total bilirubin were lower, and albumin levels were higher in all hepatocyte SRBAL treatment groups. No evidence of porcine endogenous retrovirus was identified in monkey liver or blood after SRBAL treatment. Titers of monkey antibody (IgG, IgM) did not rise after SRBAL treatment. In survival cases, the proportion of necrotic and apoptotic hepatocytes was lower in SRBAL-treated groups, with earlier liver regeneration leading to recovery. Cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β, IL-8, IFN-γ and IL-2 were ameliorated by the SRBAL treatment, while levels of M-CSF; HGF, EGF and VEGF; IL-1RA and MIF rose on priming, proliferation and the late phase of liver regeneration. Conclusions: The benefit of SRBAL therapy included preventive effects and therapeutic effects. SRBAL improved survival rate and prolonged median survival time in a nonhuman primate model of drug-induced ALF, and these benefits declined with a delay in the initiation of therapy. Improved survival and recovery of ALF monkeys was associated with a reduction in blood ammonia levels, inhibition of the pro-inflammatory response of ALF, and provided a microenvironment more suitable for regeneration of the injured liver.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the spheroid reservoir bioartificial liver (SRBAL) with porcine hepatocyte organoids in a preclinical nonhuman primate model of acute liver failure (ALF). Methods: Thirty healthy rhesus monkeys were infused with α-amanitin and lipopolysaccharide and randomized into five groups (ALF alone control group; sham no-cell SRBAL treatment group; groups A, B and C with SRBAL treatment started at 12 h, 24 h and 36 h after induction of ALF, respectively). Animals were continuously treated with the SRBAL device for 6 h and followed for up to 336 h. Results: Survival of ALF monkeys improved with hepatocyte SRBAL treatment compared to control groups. Blood ammonia and total bilirubin were lower, and albumin levels were higher in all hepatocyte SRBAL treatment groups. No evidence of porcine endogenous retrovirus was identified in monkey liver or blood after SRBAL treatment. Titers of monkey antibody (IgG, IgM) did not rise after SRBAL treatment. In survival cases, the proportion of necrotic and apoptotic hepatocytes was lower in SRBAL-treated groups, with earlier liver regeneration leading to recovery. Cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β, IL-8, IFN-γ and IL-2 were ameliorated by the SRBAL treatment, while levels of M-CSF; HGF, EGF and VEGF; IL-1RA and MIF rose on priming, proliferation and the late phase of liver regeneration. Conclusions: The benefit of SRBAL therapy included preventive effects and therapeutic effects. SRBAL improved survival rate and prolonged median survival time in a nonhuman primate model of drug-induced ALF, and these benefits declined with a delay in the initiation of therapy. Improved survival and recovery of ALF monkeys was associated with a reduction in blood ammonia levels, inhibition of the pro-inflammatory response of ALF, and provided a microenvironment more suitable for regeneration of the injured liver.
Acute liver failure (ALF) is defined by the acute presentation of coagulopathy, jaundice and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in the absence of pre-existing liver disease. ALF is associated with a high mortality rate exceeding 50% 1. Orthotopic liver transplantation is the only proven therapy for ALF, but its overall usage is limited by the need for major surgery, life-long immunosuppression, and the shortage of donor organs. The expanding gap between the number of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation and available donor livers has highlighted the strong need for alternative therapies, especially in the setting of ALF 2.New therapies, including cell transplantation, such as hepatocyte transplantation and stem cell transplantation, tissue engineered livers and liver support systems are currently under investigation. Among them, liver support systems including acellular artificial liver (AL) devices and cell-based bioartificial liver (BAL) devices have been developed with a promising goal of supplementing liver function 3. Both options are intended to bridge patients with liver failure to transplantation or to allow the native liver time for spontaneously recover through regeneration.Molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS) is a widely used AL device. It was designed as a multi-circulation purification system with continuous detoxification of albumin-bound toxins. Many studies have demonstrated the ability of MARS to remove toxins, and thus ameliorate symptoms of HE. Other studies have suggested an improved survival rate during ALF; however, improved survival of MARS has not yet been demonstrated in a prospective randomized clinical trial 4, 5. Despite evidence of beneficial improvements, the lack of metabolic and synthetic activity by MARS limits its effectiveness and may expose the ALFpatients to a risk of thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy.In contrast, bioartificial liver (BAL) devices are composed of living cells that can perform the numerous functions of a normal liver 6. Our improved spheroid reservoir bioartificial liver (SRBAL) contains porcine hepatocyte-HUVEC spheroids, termed organoids, that conduct comprehensive metabolism, synthesis and effective detoxification 7. SRBAL makes use of a hollow fiber cartridge membrane to allow passage of toxins, proteins and other waste substances without exchange of larger blood components from the patient or hepatocytes from the SRBAL. In a previous preclinical study involving ALFpigs, SRBAL exhibited effective ammonia clearance associated with neuroprotection and a reduction in both intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain edema 8, 9. The possibility of xeno-zoonosis, such as porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) transmission, was not addressed in the prior study. Further investigation of SRBAL therapy in a primate species could better address the possibility of PERV transmission during exposure to porcine hepatocytes and provide supporting data to determine the therapeutic benefit of SRBAL therapy prior to its clinical application.We have established a nonhuman primate model of ALF using intraperitoneal administration of α-amanitin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in Macaca mulatta (rhesus) monkeys 10. In the current randomized prospective preclinical study, primary porcine hepatocytes were co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as the cell source for SRBAL. Our experimentation was designed to answer the following questions: 1. Does SRBAL treatment improve survival of ALFrhesus monkeys? 2. Are the levels of ammonia, bilirubin, liver enzymes and cytokines influenced by SRBAL and associated with improved outcome of ALF? 3. What is the therapeutic mechanism of SRBAL for ALF? Answers to these questions are needed to establish a mechanistic role for cell-based liver support therapy and to design future clinical trials of SRBAL.
Methods
All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Animal Experiment Center of Sichuan University (Approval No. 2016063A) and met institutional and national guidelines. All animals were cared for in accordance with the requirements of the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act and amendments thereof.
Animals
Male Bama miniature pigs aged 3 months (8-10 kg) were purchased from the Animal Experiment Center of Sichuan University (Chengdu, China). High protein diet (40%) and water were given for 7 days before hepatocytes isolation.Male rhesus monkeys aged 5-7 years (10-20 kg) were purchased from Safe and Secure Experimental Animal Breeding Base (Chengdu, China). Standard laboratory chow and water were given ad libitum. All animals were housed in singular standard cages in an air-conditioned room (21-25 ℃), with a 12 h light/dark cycle.
Hepatocyte-HUVEC organoids formation
Hepatocytes were isolated from male Bama miniature pigs using a modified three-step collagenase perfusion method as described elsewhere 11. The digested liver tissue was then gently split to allow cell dispersion and the collected cell suspension was filtered through four layers of gauze. Hepatocytes were washed three times with ice-cold wash media and centrifuged at 4 ℃ for 10 min at 50 ×g.HUVECs were kindly provided by State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University. Cells were cultured in high glucoseDulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% FBS.In co-culture conditions, porcine hepatocytes (5×106/mL) and HUVECs (5×104/mL) were mixed in 1000 mL of serum-free medium (SFM) 12 immediately before inoculation into four spheroid generation chambers. Spheroid chambers were incubated at 37 ℃ in a humidified atmosphere, supplied with 5% carbon dioxide gas mixture, and rocked continuously at 0.12 Hz for 24 h 12.
SRBAL treatment of ALF monkeys
Thirty rhesus monkeys were divided into five groups: 1) Group A (n=6), SRBAL treatment was initiated 12 h after administration of toxin; 2) Group B (n=6), SRBAL treatment was initiated 24 h after administration of toxin; 3) Group C (n=6), SRBAL treatment was initiated 36 h after administration of toxin; 4) Group D (n=6), sham no-cell SRBAL treatment without hepatocytes was initiated 12 h after administration of toxin; 5) Group E (n=6), ALF-alone group, animals received standard intensive care alone after administration of toxin.ALF was induced in the rhesus monkeys with intraperitoneal administration of 0.1 mg/kg α-amanitin (Sigma-Aldrich, CA, USA) and 1.0 μg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma-Aldrich) as described elsewhere 10. Animals were then allowed to move and eat freely in cages.During treatment, animals in all groups were anesthetized with intramuscular administration of Zoletil 50 (10 mg/kg body weight, Virbac, France) and sedation was maintained with propofol (6 mg/kg/h, QingyuanJiabo, Guangdong, China). Rhesus monkeys in groups A-D underwent placement of a central venous catheter (16 G, Puyi, Shanghai, China) in the femoral vein as blood outflow and a catheter (20 G) in the peripheral vein as blood inflow. The bioreactor of SRBAL device was inoculated with hepatocyte-HUVEC organoids. The animals were connected to the SRBAL as shown in Figure and treated for 6 h. Animals were recovered and then received standard care for one week to allow healing of incisions and to confirm health status.
PERV RNA and DNA detection
Total RNA was prepared from porcine hepatocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from the monkeys in all groups with Trizol (Invitrogen) and was reverse transcribed to cDNA using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). RT-PCR was carried out using SsoFast Eva Green Supermix Kit (Bio-Rad) according to the instructions.Total DNA was extracted from porcine hepatocytes and PBMCs from the monkeys with E.Z.N.A.® DNA Extraction Kit (Omega, CA, USA) and amplified using Taq PCR Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) in accordance with the manual. The products were loaded on 2% agarose gel and visualized by GoldView nucleic acid staining solution.DNA was further prepared using the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) Supermix (Bio-Rad) for generation and amplification of sample droplets according to the manufacturer's protocol, then read by a digital droplet (dd)PCR system (QX200, Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The signals from different samples were counted and redistributed according to Poisson's algorithm.
Parameters
After ALF induction, all monkeys were monitored every 12 h for the first 48 h and every 24 h for the remainder of the study. During the 6 h treatment, animals were monitored every hour (Figure ). Vital signs were recorded by cardiogram monitoring. Blood samples were collected for subsequent analyses. Serum biochemistry was assayed using a chemistry analyzer AU5800 series (Beckman Coulter). Ammonia concentrations were quantified by a blood ammonia assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing, China). S-100 β proteins have emerged as a biomarker of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and neuropathological conditions including encephaledema and increased ICP 13, 14. Thus, elevated S-100 β levels were measured using an ELISA kit (Ruikesi, Chengdu, China). Rhesus IgG and IgM levels were detected using ELISA kits (Ruikesi). All the kits were analyzed with a MQX 200 microplate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., VT, US). Cytokines were assessed using a Luminex 100 instrument with xPONENT 3.1 software using Monkey Cytokine Magnetic 29-Plex Panel (Invitrogen, CA, US).
Histology
Liver tissues were collected for histochemistry and immunohistochemistry to determine the effects of SRBAL treatment on liver necrosis, apoptosis, phagocytosis and regeneration. Liver tissue was obtained by needle biopsies from ALF monkeys at multiple time points: before drug infusion, 48 h after drug infusion, 48 h after sham treatment and at 48 h, 168 h and 336 h after SRBAL treatments. Liver tissue was fixed in 10% formalin and then embedded in paraffin. All specimens were analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, active caspase-3 staining (cleaved caspase-3 antibody, Affinity Biologicals, Ancaster, Canada), CD68 staining (anti-CD68 antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Ki-67 staining (anti-Ki-67 antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's t test. Survival time was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier, and significance was tested with the log-rank test. A level of p < 0.05 was accepted as significant. All data were analyzed with SPSS software version 17.0.
Results
Hepatocyte organoids formation
Porcine hepatocytes from one donor mini pig were harvested (Figure ) and co-cultured with the HUVECs in the rocker system to form hepatic organoids (Figure ). The average initial total cell yield of fresh suspension from all pigs reached (2.56±0.41) ×1010 cells. Cell viability of hepatic organoids was greater than 98% (Figure ). Over 94% of organoids were >50 μm diameter after 24 h culture (Figure ). All the organoids were used for one SRBAL treatment. Organoids preserved higher levels of liver-specific genes including alb, hnf4, g6pc and cyp3a7 (Figure ). Average rates of oxygen consumption (184.3±1.9 μmol/min), albumin production (1944.6±84.5 ng/h), and urea synthesis (63.3±0.6 mg/h) were determined after 30 min of equilibration in the SRBAL reservoir, indicating high viability and active functionality of hepatocyte organoids prior to treatment (Figure ).
Survival
None of the animals in the ALF control group survived beyond 68 h. The median survival time (MST) of the ALF control group was 60.5 h, whereas the MST of the sham SRBAL group was 90 h. In contrast, animals in the SRBAL treatment groups survived longer. The MST was significantly prolonged in the 12 h SRBAL group (336 h, p < 0.0001). The MSTs of the 24 h SRBAL and 36 h SRBAL groups were 248 h and 131.5 h (p < 0.0001) respectively, both shorter than that of the 12 h SRBAL group (p < 0.0001) (Figure ). This result also proved that earlier treatment had a better outcome.
Immunoreactivity evaluation
The levels of IgM in rhesus blood were increased 3-4-fold 24 h after administration of α-amanitin and LPS but declined to normal level by the end of the experiment (336 h) (Figure ). The levels of IgG in rhesus blood did not increase significantly (Figure ).Agarose gel electrophoresis revealed no PERV DNA in PBMCs of monkeys exposed to pig hepatocytes by SRBAL treatment (Figure ). The ddPCR assay did not detect copy numbers of PERV in PBMCs and liver tissue of monkeys (Figure ). Quantitative assessment in RT-PCR showed no PERV mRNA in monkey PBMCs in all groups at 12 h after initiation of treatment (Figure ).
Treatment efficacy
Animal survival was influenced by the timing of SRBAL therapy after induction of ALF. All six rhesus monkeys in the 12 h SRBAL group were eating and drinking within 3 days after SRBAL treatment; these group A animals moved freely within 7 days and all survived to 14 days. Fifty percent (3 of 6) of group B monkeys and 17% (1 of 6) of group C monkeys survived to 14 days. All ten animals who survived to 14 days remained healthy at 1 year. In contrast, none of the control animals in sham group or ALF group survived to 14 days.As summarized in Figure , all animals showed marked increases in PT, ALT, AST, TB and ammonia, and a significant decrease in ALB level 12 h after α-amanitin and LPS administration. The ammonia levels of animals in the ALF and sham treatment groups increased significantly and reached 850.0±28.1 μM and 740.0±21.2 μM at 48 h after drug administration, respectively. In the treatment group, the ammonia levels decreased to 114.8±9.6 μM in group A, 556.2±25.5 μM in group B and 738.8±13.0 μM in group C at 48 h after drug administration.The TB levels in the ALF and sham groups increased significantly and reached 46.9±1.8 μM and 42.2±1.3 μM at 48 h after drug administration. Meanwhile, the TB levels decreased to 2.8±0.6 μM in group A, 23.4±2.4 μM in group B and 32.9±1.1 μM in group C at 48 h after drug administration.The albumin levels were 26.5±2.3 g/L and 30.7±1.6 g/L in the ALF and sham groups, respectively. In contrast, the levels of albumin were 41.9±2.2 g/L in group A, 36.3±2.6 g/L in group B, and 29.6±2.0 g/L in group C at 48 h after drug administration.The S-100 β levels in the ALF and sham groups increased significantly and reached 27.1±5.0 ng/mL and 16.4±6.0 ng/mL at 48 h after drug administration. However, the S-100 β levels decreased to 5.5±1.6 ng/mL in group A, 15.4±2.8 ng/mL in group B and 14.3±1.2 ng/mL in group C at 48 h after drug administration.Other laboratory parameters were improved during (Table ) and after the treatment (Figure and Figure ) with significance.
ALF liver histology
All liver tissue from study monkeys appeared normal before drug infusion. Extensive parenchymal hemorrhagic necrosis and steatosis was observed at 48 h after toxin infusion in ALF control group animals. The livers were still extensively necrotic with obvious bleeding across the entire lobule after sham treatment with a no-cell device. The necrosis was notably alleviated by SRBAL treatment with hepatocyte organoids in group A at 48 h. Vacuoles appeared in the pale cytoplasm, and cytoplasmic borders were indistinct in groups B and C. These lesions were gradually reversed at 168 h and 336 h after drug administration in surviving animals (Figure ).Active caspase-3 staining for hepatocyte apoptosis was scarcely observed in healthy liver. Apoptosis was intense in ALF and sham groups at 48 h after drug infusion, according to numerous positive cells. In experimental groups, the caspase-3 expression levels were lower after the SRBAL treatment at the same time point. Positive staining for caspase-3 can still be occasionally observed in some inflammatory cells after the repair at 168 h and 336 h (Figure ).CD68 is a useful marker for the macrophage lineage. CD68 staining showed the Kupffer cells (KCs) lined the walls of the sinusoids in the liver. CD68-positive cells were intensively recruited and activated after the ALF induction. The SRBAL treatment alleviated the overwhelming recruitment of CD68-positive cells. In experimental groups, the levels of CD68-positive cells were lower after the treatments at 48 h after drug infusion. After the vigorous process of phagocytosis, the dead cells were cleared, and numbers of KCs dropped back to normal (Figure ).Staining of the regenerative marker Ki-67 was rare in normal livers and a small number of proliferating hepatocytes were observed in ALF and sham groups. The SRBAL treatments with hepatocyte organoids increased significantly the percentage of proliferating cells in group A at 48 h after drug administration. The proliferation completed before 168 h. Most of the proliferated cells were located in the area that had normal hepatocyte morphology in groups B and C at 48 h. There were still hepatocytes proliferating at 168 h and 336 h in groups B and C after drug administration (Figure ).
Cascade of inflammatory cytokines
Strong inflammatory responses were observed, as evidenced by significant increases in the levels of TNF-α and secondary pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β, IL-8, IFN-γ and IL-2. This suggested intense activation of KCs during the development of ALF. Serum levels of these inflammatory cytokines decreased after SRBAL treatment. However, IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, did not show a significant increase during SRBAL treatment, demonstrating that the survival benefit did not depend on establishing a counter-regulatory homeostasis to prevent overwhelming inflammation (Figure and Figure ).Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a cytokine that is the primary regulator of macrophage survival, proliferation and differentiation. Although significant increases of M-CSF were observed in all groups after ALF induction, higher levels of M-CSF were detected in SRBAL treatment groups, especially in group A. This demonstrated that the lower levels of M-CSF were associated with the higher deaths, compared with those in the survival cases (Figure and Figure ).There were later peaks in growth factors including HGF, EGF and VEGF. According to histological evaluation, proliferation and recovery had started at 48 h. HGF and EGF promoted hepatocyte proliferation, while VEGF stimulated angiogenesis, through binding their receptors on the surface of hepatocyte and endothelial cells respectively (Figure and Figure ).IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) can inhibit the activities of IL-1β 15, while macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) plays an important role in the regulation of macrophage function 16. Up-regulated expressions of IL-1RA and MIF were observed in groups A, B and C (Figure and Figure ). This result suggested these cytokines have a role in mitigating the inflammatory response.
Discussion
Human hepatocytes are the preferred source of cells for a BAL, but they are currently an impractical source due to limitations in both quantity and availability. Immortalized humanhepatoblastoma cell lines like C3A or HepG2 can produce proteins; however, they demonstrate poor metabolism and ammonia clearance 17, 18. Immortalized C3A cells have been tested in the extracorporeal liver assist device (ELAD); however, no randomized control trials have shown survival benefit to date and meta-analysis results are inconclusive 19. Human-induced hepatocytes (hiHep) have potentials for metabolic detoxification, but they need further testing to minimize safety concerns and to reduce costs to meet clinical use 20. Shi et al. have used hiHep derived from human fetal fibroblasts in a BAL support system in a D-gal-induced model 21. The hiHep-based BAL treatment could attenuate liver damage, resolve inflammation and enhance liver regeneration; however, it is cumbersome and time-consuming to prepare adequate and high-quality cells for emergent patient demands. Freshly isolated primary porcine hepatocytes have more complete metabolic profiles compared to cells lines, especially ureagenesis, glycogenesis and drug metabolism via the cytochrome P450 system. In addition, cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions are known to be crucial in maintaining specific functions of hepatic cells 22. A spheroid culture rocker system, the unique system we exploited to form hepatocyte-HUVEC organoids; can improve the viability and metabolic functions of hepatocytes 12. Before treatment, after putting the hepatocyte organoids into the reservoir, oxygen consumption, albumin production and urea synthesis were evaluated to meet the minimum criteria. The organoid functionality was stable for at least 36 h and still kept high viability and active function after the treatments (Figure ).Our data suggest that the survival time of ALF monkeys was increased significantly by SRBAL treatment initiated at 12 h compared to the two control groups (no device treatment or no cell treatment). The benefits of SRBAL therapy included preventive effects and therapeutic effects, and these benefits declined with a delay in the initiation of therapy. And, the sham group without cells prolonged the survival time of animals due to dialysis of the blood by 25 g/L albumin solution across a permeable membrane to remove albumin-bound toxins. SRBAL possessed notable potentials for metabolic detoxification by reducing serum levels of ammonia, bilirubin and cytokines. However, the benefit of SRBAL treatment was more than a reduction in the toxic effect of drug infusion, otherwise the MST of the sham group should be prolonged obviously because of the early initial treatment time. SRBAL for the treatment of liver disease is relevant from three perspectives: firstly, by reducing the toxic effects of toxins and metabolites; secondly, by inhibiting inflammatory reactions; and thirdly, by providing a microenvironment that is suitable for improving regeneration.The primary reason for the improved survival of ALF animals after SRBAL treatment is thought to be the prevention of progressive HE 8. Ammonia is widely considered as the major pathogenic contributor to cerebral edema and dysfunction 23. However, the correlation between HE and ammonia concentration is not always consistent 24. In this study, we pooled all the observations obtained at different time-points and in all experimental groups and found that ammonia concentration correlated with S-100 β level, the neuropathological biomarker (Pearson R2 = 0.59, P < 0.0001). In fact, LPS plays a crucial role in the progression of HE in patients with liver disease: it can increase brain water significantly without destroying the anatomical integrity of the BBB 25. It is quite common that patients with liver disease show tendency to translocation of gut microbiota, which is strongly associated with mortality 26. In response to LPS, KCs in the liver can be activated through Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) to produce significant amounts of TNF-α. The elevation of TNF-α can self-reinforce to sustain its concentration and activity in the microenvironment and secondarily upregulate secretion of cytokines including IL-6, IFN-γ and IL-1β, pro-inflammatory cytokines that heavily exacerbate astrocyte swelling and increase ICP 27. They can also damage endothelial cells and increase vascular permeability, leading to significantly enhanced ammonia concentration, which has toxic effects in the central nervous system. Additionally, cytokines like TNF-α may also reduce levels of branch chain amino acids and increase the peripheral type benzodiazepine receptors in the cortex and striatum 28. The level of S-100 β was correlated with those of IL-6 (Pearson R2 = 0.77, P < 0.0001) and TNF-α (Pearson R2 = 0.71, P < 0.0001) as well (Figure ). A multiple linear regression model with the dependent variables of ammonia, IL-6 and TNF-α concentration can be established as follows:to predict the S-100 β levels and emergence of HE.KCs, the specialized macrophages located in the liver, mediate hepatic innate immune defense and promote hepatocyte proliferation after liver injury. Their numbers are regulated during disease progression by the stimulation of M-CSF. According to previous studies, serum M-CSF is an important response to liver injury: M-CSF level increases after partial hepatectomy and acetaminophen-induced ALF. Low serum level of M-CSF is associated with increased patient mortality 29. In our study, serum M-CSF was increased significantly compared with baseline of healthy monkeys. Lower serum M-CSF was associated with progression of ALF and subsequent death, whereas an increase in serum M-CSF level appeared in those livers that regenerated (Figure ). However, the numbers of KCs in the liver were much less in the survival cases; this may be because the increased M-CSF had some effects on activing macrophages in the circulation to proliferate but inhibited migration of mature cells of the immune system into tissue. Serum M-CSF can also be used as a novel prognostic biomarker for α-amanitin/LPS-induced ALF. Administration of M-CSF may have some potential as a therapeutic intervention.The primary immunological barrier to the use of porcine hepatocytes for SRBAL is hyperacute rejection mediated by naturally occurring cytotoxic antibodies present in the serum of rhesus monkeys 30. The release of porcine antigens could reach the animals' circulation, stimulating the production of xenoreactive antibodies. Nyberg et al. reported that repetitive exposure of dogs to porcine antigens after BAL treatment resulted in strongly hepatotoxic IgG (150 kD) and IgM (900 kD) xenoantibodies. However, the severe response may be reduced with 65 kD membrane molecular weight cutoff, compared to 200 nm, 10 nm or 400 kD 31-33. We observed a 3- to 4-fold increase in IgM antibodies in the monkey blood 24 h after drug administration, but there was no further increase after treatment with SRBAL containing porcine hepatocytes. In fact, IgM level declined to normal, while IgG did not show an obvious increase the whole time. The IgM and IgG levels remained unchanged thereafter in the animals without immunosuppression. The reason may be that IgM was the first antibody to appear in response to initial exposure to the LPS, rather than from the xenogeneic hepatocytes. However, The IgM response was not strong enough to cause maturation of the antibody response and mediate a secondary immune response. Thus, IgG was not generated after antigenic stimulation.As a xenogeneic cell, primary porcine hepatocytes have other safety concerns, including a means of xeno-zoonosis. For example, PERV, first discovered in 1971 in PK15 cells 34, has been shown to infect the humanHEK293 cell line in vitro
35. However, the replication status and clinical consequences of cross-species PERV infectivity is still under debate. The biological safety of treatments based on porcine hepatocytes, such as SRBAL, must be investigated before clinical trials on patients. Nyberg et al. demonstrated that exposure to PERV during extracorporeal therapy is highly correlated with the pore size and composition of the semipermeable membrane used in the device 36. Therefore, we used well-established and sensitive detection methods, PCR, ddPCR and RT-PCR, to measure PERV DNA and mRNA in blood samples of monkeys treated with SRBAL. Our data suggests that no PERV virus crossed through the 65 kDa semipermeable membrane of the SRBAL device. In addition, negative PERV detection in tissues after 6 h treatment suggested a very low infection risk of PERV in the short duration of SRBAL treatment. Further research about whether PERV infection can be accumulated and be correlated to the treatment interval should be planned.In conclusion, our study suggests that SRBAL exhibits a remarkable capacity to support liver function by detoxification and suppression of inflammation, leading to liver regeneration and spontaneous recovery of rhesus monkeys with ALF. During the SRBAL treatment, no evidence regarding xenoantigens or PERV infection were observed, suggesting that SRBAL treatment is safe within the conditions of this one-time treatment. Whether a higher cell dose and longer or repeated SRBAL treatments can be safe and improve the survival benefit when starting the treatment later, such as in group B and C, remains to be investigated. Moreover, further research on next-generation models is needed to pave the way for clinical application of SRBAL in the future.Supplementary figures and tables.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Faouzi Saliba; Christophe Camus; François Durand; Philippe Mathurin; Alexia Letierce; Bertrand Delafosse; Karl Barange; Pierre François Perrigault; Magali Belnard; Philippe Ichaï; Didier Samuel Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jaime M Glorioso; Shennen A Mao; Brian Rodysill; Taufic Mounajjed; Walter K Kremers; Faysal Elgilani; Raymond D Hickey; Hakon Haugaa; Christopher F Rose; Bruce Amiot; Scott L Nyberg Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Harvey S Chen; Dong Jin Joo; Mohammed Shaheen; Yi Li; Yujia Wang; Jian Yang; Clara T Nicolas; Kelly Predmore; Bruce Amiot; Gregory Michalak; Taofic Mounajjed; Jeff Fidler; Walter K Kremers; Scott L Nyberg Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sherzad Balata; Steven W M Olde Damink; Karen Ferguson; Ian Marshall; Peter C Hayes; Nicolaas E p Deutz; Roger Williams; Joanna Wardlaw; Rajiv Jalan Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Colleen M Brophy; Jennifer L Luebke-Wheeler; Bruce P Amiot; Harris Khan; Rory P Remmel; Piero Rinaldo; Scott L Nyberg Journal: Hepatology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Benjamin M Stutchfield; Daniel J Antoine; Alison C Mackinnon; Deborah J Gow; Calum C Bain; Catherine A Hawley; Michael J Hughes; Benjamin Francis; Davina Wojtacha; Tak Y Man; James W Dear; Luke R Devey; Alan M Mowat; Jeffrey W Pollard; B Kevin Park; Stephen J Jenkins; Kenneth J Simpson; David A Hume; Stephen J Wigmore; Stuart J Forbes Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Yi Li; Harvey S Chen; Mohammed Shaheen; Dong Jin Joo; Bruce P Amiot; Piero Rinaldo; Scott L Nyberg Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Victor Dong; Maxime Gosselin; Nishita Jagarlamudi; Beverley Kok; Mark G Swain; Jasmohan S Bajaj; Juan G Abraldes; Vladimir Marquez; R Todd Stravitz; Aldo J Montano-Loza; Manuela Merli; Phil Wong; Amanda Brisebois; Puneeta Tandon; Julia Wendon; Scott L Nyberg; François M Carrier; Michael R Lucey; Florence Wong; Jordan J Feld; Constantine J Karvellas; Christopher F Rose; Julien Bissonnette Journal: Can Liver J Date: 2019-12-10
Authors: Joshua Hefler; Braulio A Marfil-Garza; Rena L Pawlick; Darren H Freed; Constantine J Karvellas; David L Bigam; A M James Shapiro Journal: PeerJ Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 2.984