Literature DB >> 30555536

Optimal duration and predictors of diagnostic utility of patient-activated ambulatory ECG monitoring.

Eugene S J Tan1, Swee-Chong Seow1, Pipin Kojodjojo1, Devinder Singh1, Wee Tiong Yeo1, Toon Wei Lim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied the optimal duration of ambulatory event monitors for symptomatic patients and the predictors of detected events.
METHODS: Patients with palpitations or dizziness received a patient-activated handheld event monitor which records 30 s single-lead ECG strips. Patients were monitored in an ambulatory setting for a range of 1-4 weeks and ECG strips interpreted by five independent electrophysiologists. Event pick-up rates and clinical covariates were analysed.
RESULTS: Of 335 consecutive adults (age 50±16 years, 58% female) with palpitations (94%) and dizziness (25%) monitored, 286 patients (85%) reported events, and clinically significant events were detected in 86 (26%) patients. Of these 86 patients, 26% had ≥2 significant events, and 73% had events detected in the first 3 days. No significant events were detected after 12 days. The most common ECG abnormalities detected were premature ventricular ectopy (38%), premature atrial ectopy (37%) and atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (34%). A history of AF (adjusted OR (AOR) 4.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 15.8), previous arrhythmia (AOR 2.8, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.9) and previous abnormal ambulatory monitoring (AOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 9.4) were associated with detection of clinically significant events. Patients older than 50 years were 82% more likely to have a clinically significant event (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.6).
CONCLUSION: Patient-activated ambulatory event monitoring for 7 days may be sufficient in the diagnosis of symptomatic patients as significant events first detected beyond 10 days were rare. Patients with a history of AF, arrhythmia or previous abnormal ambulatory monitoring may require even shorter monitoring periods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory event monitoring; ECG; Palpitations

Year:  2018        PMID: 30555536      PMCID: PMC6267449          DOI: 10.1136/heartasia-2018-011061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Asia        ISSN: 1759-1104


  21 in total

1.  Diagnostic yield of patient-activated loop recorders for detecting heart rhythm abnormalities in general practice: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Emmy Hoefman; Henk C P M van Weert; Johannes B Reitsma; Rudolph W Koster; Patrick J E Bindels
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads.

Authors:  M SOKOLOW; T P LYON
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1949-02       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Premature atrial contractions in the general population: frequency and risk factors.

Authors:  David Conen; Martin Adam; Frederic Roche; Jean-Claude Barthelemy; Denise Felber Dietrich; Medea Imboden; Nino Künzli; Arnold von Eckardstein; Stephan Regenass; Thorsten Hornemann; Thierry Rochat; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Nicole Probst-Hensch; David Carballo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy: a treatable condition.

Authors:  Glenn K Lee; Kyle W Klarich; Martha Grogan; Yong-Mei Cha
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02

5.  Diagnostic yield of automatic and patient-triggered ambulatory cardiac event recording in the evaluation of patients with palpitations, dizziness, or syncope.

Authors:  Nicola Balmelli; Barbara Naegeli; Osmund Bertel
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Excessive supraventricular ectopic activity and increased risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke.

Authors:  Zeynep Binici; Theodoros Intzilakis; Olav Wendelboe Nielsen; Lars Køber; Ahmad Sajadieh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Optimal duration of event recording for diagnosis of arrhythmias in patients with palpitations and light-headedness in the general practice.

Authors:  Emmy Hoefman; Henk C P M van Weert; Kimberly R Boer; Johannes Reitsma; Rudolph W Koster; Patrick J E Bindels
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring.

Authors:  Steven A Rothman; James C Laughlin; Jonathan Seltzer; Jasjit S Walia; Rakesh I Baman; Samer Y Siouffi; Robert M Sangrigoli; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03

9.  A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope.

Authors:  Soori Sivakumaran; Andrew D Krahn; George J Klein; Jane Finan; Raymond Yee; Suzanne Renner; Allan C Skanes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Prospective, multicentre validation of a simple, patient-operated electrocardiographic system for the detection of arrhythmias and electrocardiographic changes.

Authors:  Gerrit Kaleschke; Boris Hoffmann; Imke Drewitz; Gerhard Steinbeck; Michael Naebauer; Andreas Goette; Günter Breithardt; Paulus Kirchhof
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  1 in total

1.  Arrhythmia Detection is Improved by 14-Day Continuous Electrocardiography Patch Monitoring and CHA2DS2-VASc Score.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Cheng; Lung-Sheng Wu; Chia-Tung Wu; Chia-Pin Lin; Pao-Hsien Chu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.672

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.