Human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 in human salivary carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: a potential therapeutic target.

BACKGROUND: To inhibit human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in salivary carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) and investigate the effects on tumor cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis. To assess the possibility of blocking HER2 to improve the malignant biological behavior of CXPA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER2 expression and amplification were examined using an immunofluorescence assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization in 2 CXPA cell lines (SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells). The effects on tumor cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, and HER2 downstream pathways were verified after the application of a HER2 inhibitor.
RESULTS: HER2 was overexpressed and amplified in SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cell lines. After blocking HER2, the tumor proliferation and cell cycle were significantly induced, and the apoptosis process was activated. Moreover, the downstream pathways PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK were significantly inhibited.
CONCLUSION: HER2 was overexpressed and amplified in CXPA cell lines and might thus play an important role in tumor development. Inhibiting HER2 may be a novel targeted therapy for poor biological behavior of CXPA.

Background

PA is the most common benign neoplasm of the salivary gland. Long-lasting or recurrent PA can undergo malignant transformation into CXPA.1 According to the previous study, CXPA compriseŝ4% of all salivary tumors and 12% of all salivary malignant tumors.2 On the basis of the statistics from our department, CXPA accounts for 8% of all salivary malignant tumors, representing the third most common salivary malignancy.3

HER2 is an epithelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by chromosome 17q12, which has been proven to be overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors.4,5 Previous studies have shown that HER2 is overexpressed in salivary malignant pleomorphic adenoma and is involved in multiple cellular pathways, including cell proliferation, adhesion, necrosis, and vascular growth and migration; it also plays an important role in changing the biological behavior of tumors.4 Previous studies have shown that HER2 overexpression or amplification is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with salivary invasive CXPA, which is associated with high histological grade and metastasis of CXPA.6 HER2-targeted therapy has potential application value for HER2-positive patients with CXPA.7 In that case, the effect of blocking HER2 on cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, and other biological behaviors of CXPA tumor cells warrants further study.

Lapatinib, which is a small-molecule inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of the HER2 protein, can combine with the ATP sites to prevent the phosphorylation and activation of tumor cells. Lapatinib has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer and is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients.8 Lapatinib combination therapy can significantly prolong disease progression time, improve drug response rate, and partially alleviate the symptoms of patients with trastuzumab resistance.9

In the present study, the HER2 inhibitor lapatinib was used to intervene with the tumor cells in vitro. Additionally, we evaluated whether the HER2 inhibitor could suppress the expression of HER2 in vitro and exert the inhibitory effect on the downstream signaling pathways of HER2 in CXPA cell lines, so as to improve the malignant biological behavior of the tumor.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

The human salivary gland CXPA cell lines SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 were kindly provided by Niigata University.10 The human fibroblast HS683 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. All cell lines were preserved by the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, the Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine. CXPA cells and fibroblasts were cultured with DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. The cells were digested by 0.25% trypsin with 0.02% EDTA.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

For immunofluorescence staining, cultured cells were rinsed three times with PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. After blocking in 1% BSA for 1 hour, the cells were incubated with the primary antibody in a moist, 4°C chamber overnight, washed, and then incubated for 30 minutes with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled secondary antibody in the dark (dilution 1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by staining with 5 µg/mL DAPI for 2 minutes at room temperature. The cells were washed and examined under a fluorescence microscope (E800; Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, USA) at 400× magnification.

FISH

FISH was performed on the slides of cells with a HER2 DNA Probe Kit (PathVysion, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.6 Two fluorescent-labeled DNA probes, HER2 spectrum orange and chromosome 17 enumeration control probe (CEP17) spectrum green, were included in the kit. The signal analysis was processed using an Olympus BX51 fluorescent microscope system. At least 20 tumor cell nuclei in a minimum of three different areas were counted to determine the HER2 numbers and CEP17 signals. The HER2/CEP17 ratios were consistently interpreted according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) recommendations.11 HER2 gene amplification was classified as positive when HER2/CEP17 ratio is ≥2 or HER2 copy number is ≥6.0, and negative when HER2/CEP17 ratio is <2 and HER2 copy number is <4.0. If the HER2/CEP17 ratio is <2 and HER2 copy number is 4.0–6.0, another 20 tumor cells were counted.

Western blotting analysis

The levels of HER2 (#2165; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), phosphorylated HER2 (p-HER2, #6942; Cell Signaling Technology), AKT (#4628; Cell Signaling Technology), p-AKT (#4060; Cell Signaling Technology), ERK (#4695; Cell Signaling Technology), and p-ERK (#4370; Cell Signaling Technology) were determined by Western blotting assays. The SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cell lines were washed with PBS after 1 hour of treatment with lapatinib (#S2111; Selleckchem, TX, USA) at 10−3, 10−2, 10−1, 1, and 10 µM concentration. The concentration of protein was determined by the routine process by using the protein lysate containing a phosphatase inhibitor. The available proteins were thermally denatured at 100°C for 10 minutes. The appropriate steps were followed as described in previous studies. The protein level was normalized to the internal control GAPDH (#SC-47724; Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Proliferation assay

The CCK8 (#CK04; Dojindo, Japan) colorimetric assay was used to screen for cell proliferation. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2×103 cells per well. A total of 10 µL of CCK8 solution was added to each well, and cell culture was continued for 2 hours at 37°C in dark. The absorbance was measured using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 450 nm. These measurements were carried out for 5 consecutive days. Normal human fibroblast cells were used as negative control. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Cell cycle analysis

Cells were collected and fixed in 75% ethanol, washed two times with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in 500 µL of PBS. Cell suspensions were incubated with RNase A (50 µg/mL) for 30 minutes at 37°C and sequentially stained with PI (50 µg/mL) for 1 hour and then analyzed by flow cytometry. Normal human fibroblast cells were used as negative control. Three independent experiments were performed.

Apoptosis detection

The Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells showing annexin V+/PI− staining were considered as early apoptotic cells, and those showing annexin V+/PI+ staining were considered as late apoptotic cells. After the staining, the cells were immediately analyzed using a BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer and the CellQuest software. Normal human fibroblast cells were used as negative control. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

All the statistical data were analyzed by the SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (San Diego, CA, USA). Quantitative data were presented as mean ± SD and were compared using Student’s t-test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the assays were performed at least three times independently.

Results

HER2 is expressed and amplified in CXPA cell lines

Immunofluorescence staining showed that the HER2 protein was present in both SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells, but not in fibroblast cells (Figure 1). FISH results showed that the HER2 gene was amplified in SM-AP1 cells with an average increasing gene copy number of 6.363 (Figure 2A), and in SM-AP4 cells with an average increasing gene copy number of 6.625 (Figure 2B). However, the HER2/CEP17 ratio was 1, indicating that no HER2 gene amplification occurred in the fibroblasts (Figure 2C).

Figure 1

The expression of the HER2 protein in SM-AP1, SM-AP4, and fibroblast cells.

Notes: The HER2 protein was expressed in SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells, but not in the fibroblasts. Magnification 400×.

Abbreviation: HER2, human epithelial growth factor receptor 2.

Figure 2

HER2 amplification was detected in SM-AP1 (A) and SM-AP4 (B) cells, but not in the fibroblasts (C).

Notes: Increased copy numbers (more than six) in cells are shown in A and B. HER2/CEP17 ratio =1 is shown in C. Magnification 1000×.

Abbreviation: HER2, human epithelial growth factor receptor 2.

Inhibitory effect of lapatinib on HER2 protein phosphorylation and its downstream pathway

After lapatinib treatment, HER2 protein expression in SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells was almost the same. However, the phosphorylation of HER2 was apparently suppressed. p-HER2 protein expression was inhibited by lapatinib in a dose-dependent manner. Higher lapatinib dose resulted in less expression of the p-HER2 protein (Figure 3A and B). We verified the inhibitory effect of lapatinib on the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways, which are downstream of HER2. In SM-AP1 cells, the expression of total AKT and p-AKT was inhibited by lapatinib in a dose-dependent manner, whereas lapatinib had little effect on the expression of total EKR, and p-ERK expression was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. In SM-AP4 cells, although the inhibitory effect of lapatinib on total AKT, p-AKT, and total ERK expression was not obvious, p-ERK was apparently suppressed, especially when the concentration of lapatinib was higher than 1 µM (Figure 3A and B).

Figure 3

The effect of lapatinib on HER2 expression and its downstream pathways in SM-AP1 (A) and SM-AP4 (B) cells.

Notes: (A) p-HER2, AKT, p-AKT, and p-ERK were inhibited by lapatinib in a dose-dependent manner in SM-AP1 cells. (B) p-HER2 was inhibited by lapatinib in a dose-dependent manner, and p-ERK was suppressed significantly when the concentration of lapatinib reached at 1 µM in SM-AP4 cells.

Abbreviations: HER2, human epithelial growth factor receptor 2; p-AKT, phosphorylated AKT; p-ERK, phosphorylated ERK; p-HER2, phosphorylated HER2.

Effects of lapatinib on cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis

CCK8 results showed that the activity and proliferation of SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells were decreased significantly after lapatinib treatment (P<0.001) (Figure 4A and B). Fibroblast cells were used as a control group. Lapatinib did not significantly affect the proliferation ability of fibroblasts (Figure 4C), because there was no HER2 amplification in fibroblasts (Figure 2C). The results of flow cytometry showed that the cell cycle of SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells was significantly inhibited and was blocked in the G1 phase (Table 1; Figure 5A–D). However, the cell cycle of fibroblasts was not suppressed by lapatinib (Figure 5E and F). The apoptosis of tumor cells was increased significantly after lapatinib treatment (Figure 6A–D, G). Conversely, the apoptosis of fibroblasts was not obviously affected by lapatinib (Figure 6E–G).

Figure 4

Lapatinib inhibits the activity and proliferation of SM-AP1 (A) and SM-AP4 (B) cells, but not those of normal fibroblasts (C).

Note: *Significant at P<0.001.

Abbreviation: CON, control group.

Table 1

Cell cycle analysis

Cell lines	Group	G1 (%)	P	S (%)	P	G2/M (%)	P
SM-AP1	Control	63.83±0.46	<0.001	24.37±0.99	<0.001	11.79±0.72	0.014
	Treated	77.20±0.14		14.35±0.17		8.46±0.11
SM-AP4	Control	52.68±1.44	<0.001	30.53±1.28	<0.001	16.80±0.52	<0.001
	Treated	82.75±0.53		9.62±0.25		7.62±0.28
Fibroblasts	Control	62.95±0.63	0.918	20.75±0.43	0.333	16.29±0.57	0.141
	Treated	63.03±0.97		22.76±2.17		14.81±1.28

Notes: Analysis of cell cycle in the control group and the lapatinib-treated group of SM-AP1, SM-AP4, and normal fibroblasts. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

Figure 5

The effect of lapatinib on cell cycle of SM-AP1 and SM-AP4 cells.

Note: (A and B) SM-AP1 cell cycle arrested in the G1 phase after lapatinib treatment; (C and D) SM-AP4 cell cycle arrested in the G1 phase after lapatinib treatment; (E and F) normal fibroblast cell cycle was not affected by lapatinib treatment.

Figure 6

Lapatinib promoted the apoptosis of SM-AP1 (A and B) and SM-AP4 cells (C and D), but not that of normal fibroblasts (E and F). The percentage of apoptotic cells was increased in SM-AP1 cells, whereas the percentage of early apoptotic cells was increased in SM-AP4 cells (G). The apoptosis of fibroblasts was not affected by lapatinib (G).

Note: *Significant at P<0.001.

Discussion

The HER2 protein, a receptor tyrosine kinase, belongs to the EGFR family. HER2 can phosphorylate tyrosine residues of itself or its substrate. Phosphorylated tyrosine residues can in turn activate the HER2 protein, which then lead to the activation of downstream signal molecules and subsequently cause a series of signaling cascade in cells. HER2 plays an important role in mediating various cell signal transduction pathways involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, adhesion, angiogenesis, metastasis, and other physiological processes, which are crucial for the advancement of the malignant phenotype.5

In breast cancer, HER2 is an important prognostic factor. HER2 overexpression and amplification are an important factor to be considered in the selection of targeted therapy.12,13 It has been reported that the targeting therapeutic antibody herceptin could downregulate protein expression by targeting HER2 and thus reduce the activation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways.14,15

The PI3K/AKT pathway exists widely in cells, and it is a signal transduction pathway involved in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, cell survival, adhesion, migration, and apoptosis. Studies have demonstrated that HER2 is overexpressed and amplified in breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer, and cervical cancer. Zhou et al demonstrated that the phosphorylation level of AKT increased from normal breast epithelium, atypical hyperplasia to malignant transformation and carcinomatous infiltration.16 Anti-HER2 antibodies can inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells by blocking the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway.

The MAPK/ERK pathway is an important signal transduction system mediating extracellular signal to intracellular response, which can be activated by phosphorylation by a variety of growth factors and cytokines. ERK is a core signal molecule that regulates cell growth and development; it is located in the cytoplasm and can be transferred into the nucleus to regulate cell processes after activation. HER2 combines with ligands and leads to the dimerization reaction and the activation of protein tyrosine kinases, which bind to the SH2 and SH3 domains of Grb to recruit Sos, and then activate Ras and its downstream ERK to trigger the subsequent cellular biological responses.17

Lapatinib is an orally available, small-molecule, reversible inhibitor of both EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinases, and it has been approved for use in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of advanced HER2-amplified breast cancer.18,19 Additionally, it is reported that lapatinib has been used in the targeted chemotherapy for salivary ductal carcinoma with HER2 gene amplification.20 It is necessary to elucidate the role of HER2 in tumor development and the mechanism by which lapatinib exerts effects on CXPA. We evaluated the HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in CXPA cells and found that HER2 might play a role in the progression of CXPA. In the in vitro experiments, we verified the blocking effect of lapatinib on HER2 phosphorylation and the activation of its downstream pathway; this result was similar to the findings of a previous study on breast cancer.21 In breast cancer, lapatinib could significantly downregulate p-HER2, p-EKR, and p-AKT in a dose- and time-dependent manner but could not downregulate total HER2, AKT, and ERK in SK-BR3 cells.

We also observed the subsequent inhibitory effect of lapatinib on cell viability and proliferation and induction of tumor apoptosis in CXPA cell lines. Lapatinib prohibited the activation of MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT in the downstream of HER2 to inhibit cell proliferation. This finding suggested that the activated HER2 promoted the development and malignant transformation of CXPA by activating the downstream MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways. Phosphorylation of AKT can activate the NF-κB pathway, which plays an important role in tumorigenesis, tumor formation, proliferation, and apoptosis. We suggest that the indirect inhibition of NF-κB may also play an important role in inducing tumor cell apoptosis and inhibiting tumor proliferation.

A previous study has demonstrated gain in HER2 and EGFR gene copy number in CXPA.22 In that study, Nishijima et al concluded that HER2 overexpression and HER2 gene amplification were associated with CXPA extracapsular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and worse prognosis, but EGFR overexpression was not correlated with the aggressiveness of tumor. Interestingly, high polysomy of the EGFR gene tended to promote the invasive capacity of CXPA and was related to tumor metastasis and poor prognosis. There is a discrepancy between the prognostic impacts of EGFR overexpression and high polysomy of the EGFR gene, but the molecular basis underlying these phenomena is still unclear and needs to be revealed. It is known that EGFR activation could induce oncogenic effects. Compared with a single tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lapatinib can simultaneously inhibit HER2 and EGFR to control the tumor malignant phenotype; this indicated that lapatinib could be a potential therapeutic drug for the treatment of CXPA.

HER2 is expected to become a potential drug-targeting site and is worthy of follow-up experiments to investigate.

Conclusion

We found that the HER2 gene was amplified and the HER2 protein was overexpressed in CXPA cell lines. Thus, HER2 may play an important role in tumor development. HER2 plays an important role in mediating cell signal transduction pathways in cancer. We suggest that lapatinib is an effective inhibitor that is capable of suppressing cell proliferation and cell cycle and can induce cell apoptosis in CXPA cells with HER2 gene amplification. Inhibiting HER2 may be a novel targeted therapy for poor biological behavior of CXPA.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine (Shanghai, People’s Republic of China). The ethics approval (number 2013-68) is attached.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to the contents of the manuscript in its submitted form.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.