OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) during radial artery catheterization in two populations with a contraindication to their use. BACKGROUND: Cardiac catheterization performed via the radial approach has become increasingly common worldwide, but adoption has been slow in the United States. One possible explanation is concern over radial artery vasospasm, which can complicate procedures. Spasmolytic drugs, typically intra-arterial CCBs, are used to prevent spasm, but their safety is not well established in high-risk populations, such as those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or systolic heart failure (HF), in which CCB may be contraindicated. METHODS: Consecutive STEMI and HF patients undergoing cardiac catheterization over a 1-year period were prospectively evaluated. All operators in our laboratory use the radial approach unless contraindicated. All patients received CCB immediately after sheath insertion. The primary outcome of interest was change in blood pressure immediately after CCB. Procedural outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included in the study (54 with STEMI and 129 with HF). There was a significant drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following verapamil administration (P<.001 for both), but no change in HR (P>.99). SBP decreased more than 20 mm Hg in 15.7% of patients, none of whom required initiation of vasopressors. In regression analysis, only baseline SBP correlated significantly with the change in blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI or HF can safely tolerate intra-arterial CCB during radial catheterization.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) during radial artery catheterization in two populations with a contraindication to their use. BACKGROUND: Cardiac catheterization performed via the radial approach has become increasingly common worldwide, but adoption has been slow in the United States. One possible explanation is concern over radial artery vasospasm, which can complicate procedures. Spasmolytic drugs, typically intra-arterial CCBs, are used to prevent spasm, but their safety is not well established in high-risk populations, such as those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or systolic heart failure (HF), in which CCB may be contraindicated. METHODS: Consecutive STEMI and HF patients undergoing cardiac catheterization over a 1-year period were prospectively evaluated. All operators in our laboratory use the radial approach unless contraindicated. All patients received CCB immediately after sheath insertion. The primary outcome of interest was change in blood pressure immediately after CCB. Procedural outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included in the study (54 with STEMI and 129 with HF). There was a significant drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following verapamil administration (P<.001 for both), but no change in HR (P>.99). SBP decreased more than 20 mm Hg in 15.7% of patients, none of whom required initiation of vasopressors. In regression analysis, only baseline SBP correlated significantly with the change in blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with STEMI or HF can safely tolerate intra-arterial CCB during radial catheterization.