Literature DB >> 30555017

Pneumatic compression device does not show effective thromboprophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty in a low incidence population.

Kang-Il Kim1, Dong-Kyoon Kim2, Sang-Jun Song3, Se-Jung Hong4, Dae-Kyung Bae3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Purpose of this study was to assess whether the intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) device would be an effective prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a low incidence population. HYPOTHESIS: The mechanical thromboprophylaxis could reduce the incidence of DVT compared to non-prophylaxis group and would have similar efficacy as the chemoprophylaxis following TKA in a low DVT incidence population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to June 2016, 1259 elective primary TKA with preoperative diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis in a single institute were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups: those who were managed with chemoprophylaxis (CPX group, 414 cases), with mechanical prophylaxis (IPC group, 425 cases), or without pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis (control group, 420 cases). All patients underwent preoperative ultrasonography and computed tomographic venography on postoperative day 6 to assess development of DVT. The incidence of overall, proximal, symptomatic DVT and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) were compared among the groups. Major and minor bleeding complications were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The incidence of overall DVT was 14.8% in control group, 6.3% in CPX group and 11.3% in IPC group respectively and CPX group showed significantly lower incidence than other two groups (p<0.001). The incidence of proximal DVT was 1.9% in control group, 0.7% in CPX group and 0.9% in IPC group respectively (p>0.05). The incidence of symptomatic DVT was 0.7% in control group, 0% in CPX group and 0.7% in IPC group respectively (p>0.05). There was no case of symptomatic PE diagnosed during hospital stay in all patients. DISCUSSION: Single use of IPC device could not reach significant level of DVT prophylaxis compared to control group and only chemoprophylaxis showed significantly reduce the incidence of overall DVT following TKA. Single use of IPC device does not show effective thromboprophylaxis in a low DVT incidence population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control study.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoprophylaxis; Deep vein thrombosis; Pneumatic compression; Thromboprophylaxis; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30555017     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  2 in total

1.  Effect of Comorbidity Burden on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abiram Bala; Kingsley Oladeji; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-26

2.  Asia-Pacific venous thromboembolism consensus in knee and hip arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery: Part 2. Mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  Chavarin Amarase; Aree Tanavalee; Viroj Larbpaiboonpong; Myung Chul Lee; Ross W Crawford; Masaaki Matsubara; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.