Literature DB >> 30554536

Central aortic pressure improves prediction of cardiovascular events compared to peripheral blood pressure in short-term follow-up of a hypertensive cohort.

Junli Zuo1,2, Guili Chang1, Isabella Tan3, Mark Butlin3, Shao-Li Chu1, Alberto Avolio3.   

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess indices of a comprehensive panel of central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness for prediction of cardiovascular events in a hypertensive cohort.
Methods: Noninvasive measurements of central aortic blood pressure, brachial pressure, wave reflection augmentation index, pressure amplification, pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) were obtained in 675 hypertensive patients (age 61 ± 9 years, 425 males) for a mean follow-up period 25 ± 4 months. The primary endpoints were defined as cardiovascular disease (CVD) events or death from CVD.
Results: After adjusting for confounding factors, central systolic (cSBP) and pulse pressure (cPP) showed higher hazard ratios (HR/10 mmHg) for cardiovascular events (CV) compared to peripheral pressure indices (pSBP, pPP) at age >60 years (cSBP: HR = 1.18, pSBP: HR = 1.17, p = 0.034; cPP: HR = 1.28, pPP: HR = 1.2, p = 0.019). Each SD increase in IMT and in central augmented pressure (cAP) entailed a 1.4 times higher risk of increased total events in elderly patients (age >60 years). For males, each SD increase in cAP was associated with 1.36 times higher risk of increased total events. For females, each SD increase in cAIx and cAP was associated with 0.4 and 0.5 times lower risk of increased total and major CV, respectively. This sex difference is most likely due to lack of age-related increase of cAIx in females after age >60 years compared to males.Conclusions: Central pressure improved prediction of CVD compared to peripheral pressure during a relatively short-term follow up of approximately 2 years at age >60 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central aortic pressure; brachial pressure; cardiovascular events; hypertension; target organ damage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30554536     DOI: 10.1080/10641963.2018.1557682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Risk of Target Organ Damage in Different Phenotypes of Arterial Stiffness and Central Aortic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Yaya Bai; Qian Wang; Di Cheng; Yueliang Hu; Huijuan Chao; Alberto Avolio; Biwen Tang; Junli Zuo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-14

2.  Central rather than brachial pressures are stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes: A longitudinal prospective study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Linlin Jiang; Xin Wang; Zuo Chen; Linfeng Zhang; Zugui Zhang; Congyi Zheng; Yuting Kang; Zengwu Wang; Huiqing Cao; Xiaoxia Wang; Tian Fang; Xiaoyan Han; Zhe Li; Ye Tian; Lihang Dong; Fengyu Sun; Fucai Yuan; Xin Zhou; Yunyang Zhu; Yi He; Qingping Xi; Ruihai Yang; Jun Yang; Yong Ren; Maiqi Dan; Yiyue Wang; Daming Yu; Ru Ju; Dongshuang Guo; Dahua Tan; Zhiguo Zheng; Jingjing Zheng; Yang Xu; Dongsheng Wang; Tao Chen; Meihui Su; Yongde Zhang; Zhanhang Sun; Chen Dai
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Patient preferences for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices: Wrist-type or arm-type?

Authors:  Wei-Wei Zeng; Sze Wa Chan; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.